Determinants of change in quality of life from 1 to 6 months following acute stroke

Cerebrovascular Diseases

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 67-73

  Rønning, Ole Morten ^a   Stavem, Knut ^a  

^a AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Acute stroke; Health related quality of life; SF 36; Stroke unit

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; STROKE; STROKE UNIT; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; NORWAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 39549122193     PISSN: 10159770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000111524     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Jørgensen HS, Kammersgaard LP, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Larsen K, Hubbe P, Olsen TS: Treatment and rehabilitation on a stroke unit improves 5-year survival: a community-based study. Stroke 1999;30:930-933.
2. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen T: Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. I. Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995;76:399-405.
3. Carandang R, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Kannel WB, Wolf PA: Trends in incidence, lifetime risk, severity, and 30-day mortality of stroke over the past 50 years. JAMA 2006;296:2939-2946.
4. Warlow CP, Dennis MS, van Gijn J: Stroke. A Practical Guide to Management. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, 2001.
5. Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Goldstein LB, Bonito A, Witter DM, Enarson C, Mtachar D: Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke 1997;28:740-745.
6. Wilkinson PR, Wolfe CDA, Warburton FG, Rudd AG, Howard RS, Ross-Russel RW, Beech R: Longer term quality of life and outcome in stroke patients: is the Barthel index alone an adequate measure of outcome? Qual Health Care 1997;6:125-130.
7. Wade DT, Collins C: The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64-67.
8. Schuling J, Greidanus J, Meyboom-de Jong B: Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact Profile. Disabil Rehabil 1993;15:19-23.
9. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ: Predicting disability in stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996;25:479-489.
10. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M: The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable with older adults? Age Ageing 1995;24:120-125.
11. Muller-Nordhorn J, Nolte CH, Rossnagel K, Jungehulsing GJ, Reich A, Roll S, Villringer A, Willich SN: The use of the 12-item short-form health status instrument in a longitudinal study of patients with stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Neuroepidemiology 2005;24:196-202.
12. Pickard AS, Johnsen JA, Feeney DH: Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005;14:207-219.
13. Van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ: Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:480-484.
14. Official Statistics of Norway. Oslo, Statistics Norway, 1994.
15. WHO Special Report: Stroke - 1989: recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Stroke 1989;20:1407-1431.
16. Scandinavian Stroke Study Group: Multicenter trial of hemodilution in acute ischemic stroke: background and study protocol. Stroke 1985;16:885-890.
17. Rønning OM, Guldvog B: Stroke units vs. general medical wards. II. Neurological deficits and ADL: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1998;29:586-590.
18. Rønning OM, Guldvog B: Stroke units vs. general medical wards. I. Twelve and eighteen months survival: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1998;29:58-62.
19. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
20. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. A User's Manual. Boston, Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1994.
21. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R: Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:1812-1816.
22. Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BNC: Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 1994;23:182-184.
23. Loge JH, Kaasa S: Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:250-258.
24. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Med J 1965;14:61-65.
25. Suenkeler IH, Nowak M, Misselwitz B, Kugler C, Schreiber W, Oertel WH, Back T: Time course of health-related quality of life as determined 3, 6 and 12 months after stroke: relationship to neurological deficit, disability and depression. J Neurol 2002;249:1160-1167.
26. Hopman WM, Verner J: Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2003;34:801-805.
27. Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, Wai-Kwong T, Mok V, Kai-Sing W: Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1177-1182.
28. Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke 2005;36:803-808.
29. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. New York, Wiley & Sons Inc, 1989.
30. Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen SR: Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift? Qual Life Res 2005;14:611-627.
31. Tu Y, Gilthorpe MS: Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation. Stat Med 2007;26:443-457.
32. Schwartz CE, Bode R, Repucci N, Becker J, Sprangers MA, Fayers PM: The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1533-1550.
33. Van Loon AJ, Tijhuis M, Picavet HS, Surtees PG, Ormel J: Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13;105-110.
34. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJM, Van den Boos GAM, Kromhout D: Non-response bias in a study of cardiovascular diseases, functional status and self-rated health among elderly men. Age Ageing 1998;27:35-40.
35. Carod Jartal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, Varela de Seijas E: Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995-3000.
36. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, Nieminen P, Sotaniemi KA, Myllyla VV: Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infarction. Arch Phys Med 2000;81:1541-1546.
37. Mc Cullagh E, Brigstocke G, Donaldson N, Kalra L: Determinants of caregiving burden and quality of life in caregivers of stroke patients. Stroke 2005;36:2181-2186.
38. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L: Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993;306:1437-1444.
39. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE: The Swedish SF-36 health survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1349-1358.
40. Vickers AJ, Altman DG: Statistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow-up measurements. BMJ 2001;323:1123-1124.