Are threat status and invasion success two sides of the same coin?

Ecography

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 124-130

  Jeschke, Jonathan M ^a,b   Strayer, David L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CONSERVATION STATUS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FISH; GLOBAL CHANGE; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; LIFE HISTORY;

AVES;

EID: 39549107644     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05343.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press.
2. Bishop, M. J. Peterson, C. H. 2006. When r-selection may not predict introduced-species proliferation: predation of a normative oyster Ecol. Appl. 16 : 718 730.
3. Blackburn, T. M. Cassey, P. 2004. Are introduced and re-introduced species comparable? A case study of birds Anim. Conserv. 7 : 427 433.
4. Bodmer, R. E. et al. 1997. Hunting and the likelihood of extinction of Amazonian mammals Conserv. Biol. 11 : 460 466.
5. Cardillo, M. et al. 2005. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species Science 309 : 1239 1241.
6. Cardillo, M. et al. 2006. Latent extinction risk and the future battlegrounds of mammal conservation Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103 : 4157 4161.
7. Davis, H. G. 2005. r-selected traits in an invasive population Evol. Ecol. 19 : 255 274.
8. Doherty, P. F. Jr et al. 2003. Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 5858 5862.
9. Duyck, P.-F. et al. 2007. Can more K-selected species be better invaders? A case study of fruit flies in La Reunion Divers. Distrib. 13 : 535 543.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
11. Ferguson, S. H. Higdon, J. W. 2006. How seals divide up the world: environment, life history, and conservation Oecologia 150 : 318 329.
12. Fisher, D. O. Owens, I. P. F. 2004. The comparative method in conservation biology Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 391 398.
13. Foufopoulos, J. Ives, A. R. 1999. Reptile extinctions on land-bridge islands: life-history attributes and vulnerability to extinction Am. Nat. 153 : 1 25.
14. Garland, T. Jr Ives, A. R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods Am. Nat. 155 : 346 364.
15. Garland, T. Jr et al. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation Syst. Biol. 42 : 265 292.
16. Garland, T. Jr et al. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values Am. Zool. 39 : 374 388.
17. Garland, T. Jr et al. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology J. Exp. Biol. 208 : 3015 3035.
18. Gurevitch, J. Hedges, L. V. 2001. Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments Scheiner, S. M. Gurevitch, J. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Univ. Press 347 369.
19. IUCN 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. - .
20. Jeschke, J. M. Strayer, D. L. 2005. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 7198 7202.
21. Jeschke, J. M. Strayer, D. L. 2006. Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America Global Change Biol. 12 : 1608 1619.
22. Jeschke, J. M. et al. in press. Population dynamics: r-strategists / K-strategists. - In: Jørgensen, S. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier.
23. Jones, K. E. et al. 2003. Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats Am. Nat. 161 : 601 614.
24. Keane, A. et al. 2005. Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes) Biol. Conserv. 126 : 216 233.
25. Koh, L. P. et al. 2004. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies Conserv. Biol. 18 : 1571 1578.
26. Kokko, H. Brooks, R. 2003. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction Ann. Zool. Fenn. 40 : 207 219.
27. Kolar, C. S. Lodge, D. M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 199 204.
28. Kotiaho, J. S. et al. 2005. Predicting the risk of extinction from shared ecological characteristics Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 1963 1967.
29. Lockwood, J. L. 1999. Using taxonomy to predict success among introduced avifauna: relative importance of transport and establishment Conserv. Biol. 13 : 560 567.
30. Lockwood, J. L. et al. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 223 228.
31. Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 : 133 137.
32. Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. 2004. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 1.05. - .
33. McKinney, M. L. 1997. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 : 495 516.
34. McMahon, R. F. 2002. Evolutionary and physiological adaptations of aquatic invasive animals: r selection versus resistance Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59 : 1235 1244.
35. Midford, P. E. et al. 2005. PDAP package of mesquite, version 1.06. - .
36. Morrow, E. H. Fricke, C. 2004. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals Proc. R. Soc. B 271 : 2395 2401.
37. Moyle, P. B. Marchetti, M. P. 2006. Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as a model BioScience 56 : 515 524.
38. Musick, J. A. 1999. Ecology and conservation of long-lived marine animals Am. Fish. Symp. 23 : 1 10.
39. Olden, J. D. et al. 2006. Life-history strategies predict fish invasions and extirpations in the Colorado River Basin Ecol. Monogr. 76 : 25 40.
40. Payne, J. L. Finnegan, S. 2007. The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 10506 10511.
41. Pianka, E. R. 1970. On r- and K-selection Am. Nat. 104 : 592 597.
42. Prinzing, A. et al. 2002. Does sexual selection influence population trends in European birds? Evol. Ecol. Res. 4 : 49 60.
43. Purvis, A. et al. 2000. Extinction BioEssays 22 : 1123 1133.
44. Rejmánek, M. Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77 : 1655 1661.
45. Reynolds, J. D. 2003. Life histories and extinction risk Blackburn, T. M. Gaston, K. J. Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell 195 217.
46. Reynolds, J. D. et al. 2005. Life history and ecological correlates of extinction risk in European freshwater fishes Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62 : 854 862.
47. Reznick, D. et al. 2002. r- and K-selection revisited: the role of population regulation in life-history evolution Ecology 83 : 1509 1520.
48. Sæther, B.-E. 1987. The influence of body weight on the covariation between reproductive traits in European birds Oikos 48 : 79 88.
49. Van Valkenburgh, B. et al. 2004. Cope's rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American canids Science 306 : 101 104.
50. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. Belknap.