Grounded theory as a method for research in speech and language therapy

International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 95-109

  Skeat, J ^a   Perry, A ^b  

^a ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Grounded theory; Qualitative studies; Speech and language therapy

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GROUNDED THEORY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REVIEW; SPEECH THERAPY;

DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE THERAPY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPEECH THERAPY;

EID: 39449119834     PISSN: 13682822     EISSN: 14606984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13682820701437245     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. ANNELLS, M., 1996, Grounded theory method: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 379-393.
2. ANNELLS, M., 1997a, Grounded theory method, part I: Within the five moments of qualitative research. Nursing Inquiry, 4, 120-129.
3. ANNELLS, M.. 1997b, Grounded theory method, part II: Options for users of the method. Nursing Inquiry, 4, 176-180.
4. BARRY, S., 2002, Qualitative research: more than teaching an old dog new tricks? ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 4, 32-33.
5. BECKER, P., 1993, Common pitfalls of published grounded theory research. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 254-260.
6. BRINTON, B. and FUJIKI, M., 2003, Blending quantitative and qualitative methods in language research and intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 165-171.
7. BRUCE, C., PARKER, A. and RENFREW, L., 2006, 'Helping or something': perceptions of students with aphasia and tutors in further education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 137-154.
8. CHARMAZ, K., 2000, Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 509-535.
9. COYNE, I. T., 1997, Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630.
10. CUTCLIFFE, J. R., 2000, Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476-1484.
11. DAMICO, J. S. and SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. N., 2003, Qualitative research and speech-language pathology: a tutorial for the clinical realm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 131-143.
12. DAVID, R. and WHITEHOUSE, J., 1998, Modelling the consultation process in a secondary referral unit for children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 532-537.
13. DAVIDSON, B. and MCALLISTER, L., 2002, An introduction to qualitative research approaches. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 4, 28-31.
14. EASTWOOD, J., 1988, Qualitative research: an additional research methodology for speech pathology? British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 23, 171-184.
15. EZZY, 2002, Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation (Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin).
16. GLASER, B. G., 1978, Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press).
17. GLASER, B. G., 1992, Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis (Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press).
18. GLASER, B. G., 1998, Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions (Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press).
19. GLASER, B. G., 2001, The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description (Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press).
20. GLASER, B. G., 2002, Conceptualisation: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Volume 5, Issue 2, Article 4. Available at: http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/ fqs-texte/2-04/2-04glaser-e.pdf.
21. GLASER, B. G. and HOLTON, J., 2004, Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5.
22. GLASER, B. G. and STRAUSS, A., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (New York, NY: Aldine).
23. HALL, W. A. and CALLERY, P., 2001, Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating the reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 257-272.
24. HAYHOW, R. and STEWART, T., 2006, Introduction to qualitative research and its application to stuttering. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 475-493.
25. HEATH, H. and COWLEY, S., 2004, Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 141-150.
26. HENDERSON, S., 1998, The phenomenon of patient participation in their nursing care - a grounded theory study. Unpublished PhD, Curtin University of Technology, Adelaide.
27. HERSH, D., 2003, 'Weaning' clients from aphasia therapy: speech pathologists' strategies for discharge. Aphasiology, 17, 1007-1029.
28. LAWLER, J., 1998, Choosing a research question: matching questions with methodologies. In J. Higgs (ed.), Writing Qualitative Research (Five Docks, NSW: Hampden), pp. 69-80.
29. MARKHAM, C. and DEAN, T., 2006, Parents' and professionals' perceptions of quality of life in children with speech and language difficulty. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 189-212.
30. MCCANN, T. V. and CLARK, E., 2003a, Grounded theory in nursing research - Part 1: Methodology. Nurse Researcher, 11, 7-18.
31. MCCANN, T. V. and CLARK, E., 2003b, Grounded theory in nursing research - Part 2: Critique. Nurse Researcher, 11, 19-28.
32. MELIA, K. M., 1996, Rediscovering Glaser. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 368-378.
33. MELLION, L. R. and TOVIN, M. M., 2002, Grounded theory: a qualitative research methodology for physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 18, 109-120.
34. NETTLETON, J. and REILLY, O., 1998, Facilitating effective learning during clinical placement. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 250-254.
35. O'CONNELL, B., 2000, Enabling care: working through obscurity and uncertainty. A basic social process used in selected acute care settings. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 32-39.
36. PILLING, S. and SLATTERY, J., 2004, Management competencies: intrinsic or acquired? What competencies are required to move into speech pathology management and beyond? Australian Health Review, 27, 84-92.
37. RICE, P. L. and EZZY, D., 1999, Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus (South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press).
38. SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. N. and DAMICO, J. S., 2003, Contributions of qualitative research to the knowledge base of normal communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 144-154.
39. STANLEY, M. and CHEEK, J., 2003, Grounded theory: exploiting the potential for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 143-150.
40. STERN, P. N., 1994, Eroding grounded theory. In J. Morse (ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), pp. 212-223.
41. STRAUSS, A., 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
42. STRAUSS, A. and CORBIN, J., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
43. STRAUSS, A. and CORBIN, J., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
44. TETNOWSKI, J. A. and FRANKLIN, T. C., 2003, Qualitative research: implications for description and assessment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 155-164.
45. TRULSSON, U. and KLINGBERG, G., 2003, Living with a child with a severe orofacial handicap: experience from the perspectives of parents. European Journal of Oral Science, 111, 19-25.
46. UKRAINETZ, T. A. and FREQUEZ, E. F., 2003, 'What isn't language?': a qualitative study of the role of the school speech-language pathologist. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 284-298.
47. WILSON, H. S. and HUTCHINSON, S. A., 1996, Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45, 122-124.