Interplay between physical and virtual settings for online interpersonal trust formation in knowledge-sharing practice

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 55-64

  Young, Mei Lien ^a   Tseng, Fan Chuan ^b  

^a NANHUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; KNOWLEDGE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; TEACHER; TRUST; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL FACILITATION; TRUST; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 39449110967     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0019     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Rempel JK, Holmes JG, Zanna MD. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1985; 49:95-112.
2. Goleman D. (1995) Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
3. Ridings CM, Gefen D, Arinze B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2002; 11:271-95.
4. Leimeister JM, Ebner W, Krcmar H. Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. Journal of Management Information Systems 2005; 21:101-35.
5. Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE. Is anybody out there? antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 1998; 14:29-64.
6. Mynatt ED, O'Day VL, Adler A, Ito M. Network communities: something old, something new, something borrowed. . . . Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1998; 7:123-56.
7. Baird IS, Thomas H. Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review 1985; 10:230-43.
8. Rheingold H. (1993) The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Harper Perennial.
9. Zheng J, Veinott E, Bos N, et al. (2002) Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. In: Terveen LG, Wixons DR, eds., Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2002. Minneapolis: ACM Press.
10. Hardey M. Life beyond the screen: embodiment and identity through the Internet. Sociological Review 2002; 55:570-85.
11. Brown JS, Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science 2001; 12:198-213.
12. Wasko MM, Faraj S. Why should I share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 2005; 29:35-57.
13. Clemmensen T. Community knowledge in an emerging online professional community: the case of Sigchi.dk. Knowledge & Process Management 2005; 12:43-52.
14. Rohde M, Reinecke L, Pape B, Janneck M. Community-building with Web-based systems: investigation a hybrid community of students. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 2004; 13:471-99.
15. Husserl ET. (1970) The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
16. Schutz A, Luckmann T. (1973) The structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
17. Bergum V. (1991) Being a phenomenological researcher. In: Morses JM, ed., Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Feng J, Lazar J, Preece J. Empathy and online interpersonal trust: a fragile relationship. Behaviour & Information Technology 2004; 23:97-106.
19. Sargeant A, Lee S. Donor trust and relationship commitment in the UK Charity Sector: the impact on behavior. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2004; 33:185-202.
20. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 1995; 20:709-34.
21. Rotter JB. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality 1967; 35:651-65.
22. Widen-Wulff G, Ginman M. Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital. Journal of Information Science 2004; 30:448-58.
23. Blau PM. (1964) Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
24. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998; 23:242-66.
25. Tiwana A, Balasubramaniam R. A design knowledge management system to support collaborative information product evolution. Decision Support Systems 2001; 31:241-62.
26. McDermott R. Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review 1999; 41:103-17.
27. Ruggles R. The state of notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review 1998; 40:80-9.
28. Pfeffer J, Sutton R. The smart-talk trap. Harvard Business Review 1999; 77:134-42.
29. Hendriks P. Why share knowledge? the influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge & Process Management 1999; 6:91-100.
30. Bos N, Olson J, Gergle D, et al. (2002) Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In: Terveen LG, Wixons DR, eds., Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2002. Minneapolis: ACM Press.
31. van den Hooff B, de Ridder J, Aukema E. (2004) Exploring the eagerness to share knowledge: the role of social capital and ICT in knowledge sharing. In: Huysman M, Wulfs V, eds., Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Wenger EC, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review 2000; 78:139-45.
33. Lee FS, Voge D, Limayem M. (2002) Virtual community informatics: what we know and what we need to know. In: Spragues RH, ed., Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Science.
34. Preece J. (2000) Online communities, designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: Wiley.
35. Williams, D. (2006) On and off the Net: scales for social capital in an online era. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/williams.html. Accessed August 19, 2006.
36. Walther JB. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 1994; 20:473-501.
37. Cochran-Smith M, Lytle SL. (1999) Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. In: Iran-Nejad A, Pearsons CD, eds., Review research in education 24. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38. Cousins JB, Ross JA. The reported nature and consequences of teachers' joint work in three exemplary schools. Elementary School Journal 1994; 94:441-65.
39. Newmann F. School-wide professional community. Issues in Restructuring Schools 1994; report no. 6; University of Wisconsin-Madison.
40. Imants J. Two basic mechanisms for organisational learning in schools. European Journal of Teacher Education 2003; 26:293-311.
41. Zahner J. Teachers explore knowledge management and e-learning as models for professional development. TechTrends 2002; 46:11-16.
42. McLaughlin MW. (2002) Sites and sources of teachers' learning. In: Sugure C, Days C, eds., Developing teachers and teaching practice: international research perspectives. London: Routledge/Falmer.
43. Vance V. (2004) The persistence of privacy in teacher professional development online. Available at: www.aare.edu.au/04pap/van04999.pdf. Accessed February 21, 2007.
44. Little JW. The persistence of privacy: autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record 1990; 91:509-36.
45. Van Manen M. (1990) Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: University of western Ontario Press.
46. White H. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry 1980; 7:5-27.
47. Mitchell ES. Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science 1986; 8:10-26.
48. Miles MB, Huberman MA. (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Kahneman D, Krueger AB. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2006; 20:3-24.
50. Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science 1993;16:1-8.
51. Sandelowski M. (1994) The proof is in the pottery: toward a poetic for qualitative inquiry. In: Morses JM, ed., Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. DeSanctis G, Gallupe B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 1987; 33:1589-1609.
53. Alavi M, Keen PGW. Business teams in an information age. The Information Society 1989; 6:179-95.
54. Johnson A. (1997) The forest and the trees. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
55. Pollio HR, Henley TB, Thompson CJ. (1997) The phenomenology of everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Leary MR. (1983) Understanding social anxiety: social, personality, and clinical perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57. Giorgi A. Concerning the possibility of phenomenological research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1983; 14:129-70.
58. Saetre JP. (1962) Being and nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.