Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage

Dental Materials

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-11

  Irie, M ^a   Suzuki, K ^a   Watts, D C ^b  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Luting cement; Marginal adaptation; Mechanical property; One day storage

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; BACTERIA; BENDING STRENGTH; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); BONDING; CROSSLINKING; ELASTIC MODULI; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MONOMERS; POLISHING; POLYMERIZATION; RESINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHRINKAGE; STRESSES; SWELLING;

DENTIN CAVITIES; LUTING CEMENT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION; ONE-DAY STORAGE;

DENTAL CEMENT;

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG STORAGE; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PLIABILITY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH BRUSHING;

BICUSPID; COMPOMERS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DRUG STORAGE; ELASTICITY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; WATER;

EID: 0346055615     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00052-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Caughman W.F., Chan D.C.N., Rueggeberg F.A. Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent. 86:2001;101-106.
2. Caughman W.F., O'Connor R.P., Williams H.A., Rueggeberg F.A. Retention strengths of three cements using full crown preparations restored with amalgam. Am J Dent. 5:1992;61-63.
3. Caughman W.F., Caughman G.B., Shiflett R.A., Rueggeberg F.A., Schuster G.S. Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials. 12:1991;37-40.
4. Swift E.J. Jr., May K.N. Jr., Wilder A.D. Jr. Effect of polymerization mode on bond strengths of resin adhesive/cement systems. J Prosthodent. 7:1998;256-260.
5. Wilson A.D. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Int J Prosthodent. 3:1990;425-429.
6. Mitra S.B. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res. 70:1991;72-74.
7. Hammesfahr PD. Developments in resionomer systems. In: Hunt PR, editor. Glass ionomers: the next generation - Proceedings of the Second International Symposium in Glass Ionomers, Philadelphia; 1994. p. 47-55.
8. Irie M., Suzuki K. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 24:1999;272-278.
9. Irie M., Suzuki K. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomers and compomers: effect of polishing after 1-day storage. Oper Dent. 25:2000;488-496.
10. Davidson C.L., van Zeghbroeck L., Feilzer A.J. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res. 70:1991;880-882.
11. Frankenberger R., Sindel J., Krämer N., Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs. ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 24:1999;147-155.
12. Irie M., Suzuki K. Current luting cement: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 17:2001;347-353.
13. Davidson C.L., de Gee A.J., Feilzer A.J. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 63:1984;1396-1399.
14. Munksgaard E.C., Irie M., Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res. 64:1985;1409-1411.
15. Feilzer A.J., de Gee A.J., Davidson C.L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 66:1987;1636-1639.
16. Irie M., Suzuki K., Watts D.C. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effect of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength. Dent Mater. 18:2002;203-210.
17. Brännström M., Torstenson B., Nordenvall K.-J. The initial gap around large composite restorations in vitro: the effect of etching enamel walls. J Dent Res. 63:1984;681-684.
18. ISO/TR 11405: 1994(E). Dental Materials - guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure, 6.3 Gap measurement test for adhesion to dentin, 11-12.
19. Cattani-Lorente M.-A., Godin C., Meyer J.M. Early strength of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 9:1993;57-62.
20. Li Z.C., White S.N. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;597-609.
21. Conover W.J., Iman R.L. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Statist. 35:1981;124-129.
22. Craig R.G. Restorative dental materials. 10th ed Mosby-Year Book. 1997;56-103 Mosby, St Louis.
23. Watts D.C., Kisumbi B.K., Toworfe G.K. Dimensional changes of resin/ionomer restoratives in aqueous and neutral media. Dent Mater. 16:2000;89-96.
24. Feilzer A.J., Kakaboura A.L., de Gee A.J., Davidson C.L. The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 11:1995;186-190.
25. Diaz-Arnold A.M., Vargas M.A., Haselton D.R. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;135-141.
26. Miyasaka K., Nakabayashi N. Effect of Phenyl-P/HEMA acetone primer on wet bonding to EDTA-conditioned dentin. Dent Mater. 17:2001;499-503.