Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 393-397

  Ortega, V L ^a   Pegoraro, L F ^a   Conti, P C R ^a   Do Valle, A L ^a   Bonfante, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Ceromer; Inlays; Luting resin cements; Tooth resistance

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; ENDODONTICS; MATERIALS; MICROSCOPE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH FRACTURE;

EID: 2342544660     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01239.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;65:149.
2. Khera SC, Carpenter CW, Vetter JD, Staley RN. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:139.
3. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:257.
4. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro MFL, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavities preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:419.
5. Ross IF. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. J Endodont. 1980;6:560.
6. Trope M, Langer I, Maltz D, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endodont Dent Traumatol. 1986;2:35.
7. Salis SG, Hood JAA, Stokes ANS, Kirk EEJ. Patterns of indirect-fracture in intact and restored human premolar teeth. Endodont Dent Traumatol. 1987;3:10.
8. Lambert RL, Robinson FB, Lindemuth JS. Coronal reinforcement with cross-splinted pin-amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:346.
9. Mondelli J, Ishikiriama A, Pereira JC. Cross-splinting a weakened tooth with a horizontal pin: a new method. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:442.
10. Bell JG, Smith MC, De Pont JJ. Cuspal failures of MOD restored teeth. Aust Dent J. 1982;27:283.
11. Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:421.
12. Wendt SL, Jr, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance of cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater. 1987;3:232.
13. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1540.
14. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Wieczkowski G, Williams DA, Jr. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with glass ionomer-composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:28.
15. Wendt SL, Jr. Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Am J Dent. 1991;4:10.
16. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage; a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:780.
17. Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endodont Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:49.
18. Costa LCS, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G. Influence of different metal restorations bonded with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:365.
19. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:167.
20. Mccullock AJ, Smith BGN. In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials. Br Dent J. 1986;61:405.
21. Donovan JE, Kahn RL. Restorative options for posterior teeth. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990;18:39.
22. Dérand T. Stress analysis of cement or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater. 1991;7:21.
23. White SN. Posterior restorations: change, challenge and controversy. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1996;24:14.
24. Razak AAA, Harrison A. The effect of filler content and processing variables on dimensional accuracy of experimental composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:353.
25. Zuellig-singer R, Krejci I, Lutz F. Effects of cement-curing modes on dentin bonding of inlays. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1842.
26. MacPherson LC, Smith BGN. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorations materials: an in vitro study. Br Dent J. 1995;178:341.
27. Eakle WS. Effect of thermal cycling on fracture strength and microleakage in teeth restored with a bonded composite resin. Dent Mater. 1986a;2:114.
28. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:619.
29. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlay. J Dent. 1993;21:39.
30. Oliveira FC, Denehy GE, Boyer DB. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;115:57.
31. Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res. 1986b;65:149.
32. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G, Jr, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:431.
33. Mondelli RFL, Barbosa WFS, Mondelli J, Franco EB, Carvalho RM. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage. Am J Dent. 1998;11:181.
34. Steele A, Johnson BR. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars. J Endodont. 1999;25:6.
35. Hansen EK. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mater. 1988;4:169.