Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision (Journal of Neurophysiology (2008) 99, (915-930) DOI: 10.1152/jn.00921.2007);Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 915-930

  De Vrijer, M ^a,b   Medendorp, W P ^b,c   Van Gisbergen, J A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DARKNESS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX;

EID: 39149135861     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.z9k-8807-corr.2008     Document Type: Erratum

References (75)

1. Angelaki DE, Hess BJ. Self-motion-induced eye movements: effects on visual acuity and navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 966-976, 2005.
2. Aubert H. Eine scheinbare Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links. Virchows Arch 20: 381-393, 1861.
3. Batschelet E. Mathematics in Biology: Circular Statistics in Biology. London: Academic Press, 1981.
4. Bisdorff AR, Wolsley CJ, Anastasopoulos D, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA. The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Brain 119: 1523-1534, 1996.
5. Bortolami SB, Pierobon A, DiZio P, Lackner JR. Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt. Exp Brain Res 173: 364-373, 2006.
6. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436, 1997.
7. Brandt T, Bartenstein P, Janek A, Dieterich M. Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. Brain 121: 1749-1758, 1998.
8. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Buchle W. Motion habituation: inverted self-motion perception and optokinetic after-nystagmus. Exp Brain Res 21: 337-352, 1974.
9. Brandt T, Dieterich M. The vestibular cortex. Its locations, functions, and disorders. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 293-312, 1999.
10. Brandt T, Dieterich M, Danek A. Vestibular cortex lesions affect the perception of verticality. Ann Neurol 35: 403-412, 1994.
11. Bremmer F, Klam F, Duhamel JR, Ben Hamed S, Graf W. Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur J Neurosci 16: 1569-1586, 2002.
12. Bronstein AM. The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality. The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 324-333, 1999.
13. Carandini M. Measuring the brain's assumptions. Nat Neurosci 9: 468-470, 2006.
14. Curthoys IS. The role of ocular torsion in visual measures of vestibular function. Brain Res Bull 40: 399-403, 1996.
15. Dakin SC, Mareschal I, Bex PJ. Local and global limitations on direction integration assessed using equivalent noise analysis. Vision Res 45: 3027-3049, 2005.
16. Day BL, Fitzpatrick RC. The vestibular system. Curr Biol 15: R583-R586, 2005.
17. Dichgans J, Diener HC, Brandt T. Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions. Acta Otolaryngol 78: 391-398, 1974.
18. Eggert T. Der Einfluss orientierter Texturen auf die subjektive visuelle Vertikale und seine systemtheoretische Analyse (PhD thesis). Munich, Germany: Munich Technical Univ., 1998.
19. Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A. Psychophysical methods. In: Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research, edited by Windhorst U, Johansson H. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999, p. 1211-1241.
20. Fernandez C, Goldberg JM. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. J Neurophysiol 39: 970-984, 1976.
21. Fetsch CR, Wang S, Gu Y, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE. Spatial reference frames of visual, vestibular, and multimodal heading signals in the dorsal subdivision of the medial superior temporal area. J Neurosci 27: 700-712, 2007.
22. Freeman TC, Banks MS, Crowell JA. Extraretinal and retinal amplitude and phase errors during Filehne illusion and path perception. Percept Psychophys 62: 900-909, 2000.
23. Grüsser OJ, Pause M, Schreiter U. Localization and responses of neurones in the parieto-insular vestibular cortex of awake monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Physiol 430: 537-557, 1990.
24. Gu Y, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE. A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nat Neurosci 10: 1038-1047, 2007.
25. Gu Y, Watkins PV, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC. Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area. J Neurosci 26: 73-85, 2006.
26. Henn V, Young LR, Finley C. Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields. Brain Res 71: 144-149, 1974.
27. Howard IP. Human Visual Orientation. New York: Wiley, 1982.
28. Ilg UJ, Schumann S, Thier P. Posterior parietal cortex neurons encode target motion in world-centered coordinates. Neuron 43: 145-151, 2004.
29. Inaba N, Shinomoto S, Yamane S, Takemura A, Kawano K. MST neurons code for visual motion in space independent of pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 97: 3473-3483, 2007.
30. Jaggi-Schwarz K, Hess BJ. Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical. Exp Brain Res 149: 340-350, 2003.
31. Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JA. Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. J Neurophysiol 91: 2205-2214, 2004.
32. Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JA. Canal and otolith contributions to visual orientation constancy during sinusoidal roll rotation. J Neurophysiol 95: 1936-1948, 2006.
33. Klein SA. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Percept Psychophys 63: 1421-1455, 2001.
34. Knill DC, Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27: 712-719, 2004.
35. Körding KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
36. Krauzlis RJ. Recasting the smooth pursuit eye movement system. J Neurophysiol 91: 591-603, 2004.
37. Krukowski AE, Pirog KA, Beutter BR, Brooks KR, Stone LS. Human discrimination of visual direction of motion with and without smooth pursuit eye movements. J Vis 3: 831-840, 2003.
38. Lappe M, Bremmer F, van den Berg AV. Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 329-336, 1999.
39. Laurens J, Droulez J. Bayesian processing of vestibular information. Biol Cybern 96: 389-404, 2007.
40. Lindner A, Haarmeier T, Erb M, Grodd W, Thier P. Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 1899-1912, 2006.
41. Lisberger SG, Morris EJ, Tychsen L. Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 10: 97-129, 1987.
42. Löffler G, Orbach HS. Anisotropy in judging the absolute direction of motion. Vision Res 41: 3677-3692, 2001.
43. Luyat M, Gentaz E, Corte TR, Guerraz M. Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect. Percept Psychophys 63: 541-554, 2001.
44. MacNeilage PR, Banks MS, Berger DR, Bulthoff HH. A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues. Exp Brain Res 179: 263-290, 2007.
45. Mast F, Jarchow T. Perceived body position and the visual horizontal. Brain Res Bull 40: 393-397, 1996.
46. Merfeld DM. Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520: 354-359, 1995.
47. Merfeld DM, Zupan L, Peterka RJ. Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature 398: 615-618, 1999.
48. Mittelstaedt H. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70: 272-281, 1983.
49. Mittelstaedt H. The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. Acta Psychol 63: 63-85, 1986.
50. Mittelstaedt H. The formation of the visual and postural vertical. In: Multisensory Control of Posture, edited by Mergner T, Hlavacka F. New York: Plenum Press, 1995, p. 147-155.
51. Mittelstaedt H. The role of the otoliths in perception of the vertical and in path integration. Ann NY Acad Sci 871: 334-344, 1999.
52. Müller JR, Philiastides MG, Newsome WT. Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 524-529, 2005.
53. Newsome WT, Paré EB. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 8: 2201-2211, 1988.
54. Newsome WT, Wurtz RH, Komatsu H. Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. J Neurophysiol 60: 604-620, 1988.
55. Niemeier M, Crawford JD, Tweed DB. Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception. Nature 422: 76-80, 2003.
56. Orban GA, Vogels R. The neuronal machinery involved in successive orientation discrimination. Prog Neurobiol 55: 117-147, 1998.
57. Page WK, Duffy CJ. Heading representation in MST: sensory interactions and population encoding. J Neurophysiol 89: 1994-2013, 2003.
58. Pavlou M, Wijnberg N, Faldon ME, Bronstein AM. Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. J Neurophysiol 90: 622-630, 2003.
59. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442, 1997.
60. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
61. Robinson DA. Vestibular and optokinetic symbiosis: an example of explaining by modelling. In: Control of Gaze by Brain Stem Neurons. Developments in Neuroscience, edited by Baker R, Berthoz A. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1977, p. 49-58.
62. Rosenhall U. Vestibular macular mapping in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 81: 339-351, 1972.
63. Rosenhall U. The vestibular sensory regions in man: a morphological study. Acta Univ Uppsala Suppl 191: 1-37, 1974.
64. Sauvan XM, Peterhans E. Orientation constancy in neurons of monkey visual cortex. Vis Cogn 6: 43-54, 1999.
65. Souman JL, Hooge IT, Wertheim AH. Vertical object motion during horizontal ocular pursuit: compensation for eye movements increases with presentation duration. Vision Res 45: 845-853, 2005.
66. Stocker AA, Simoncelli EP. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nat Neurosci 9: 578-585, 2006.
67. Van Beuzekom AD, Medendorp WP, Van Gisbergen JA. The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt. Vision Res 41: 3229-3242, 2001.
68. Van Beuzekom AD, Van Gisbergen JA. Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. J Neurophysiol 84: 11-27, 2000.
69. Vingerhoets RA, Van Gisbergen JA, Medendorp WP. Verticality perception during off-vertical axis rotation. J Neurophysiol 97: 3256-3268, 2007.
70. Wertheim A. Motion perception during self-motion. The Direct versus Inferential controversy revisited. Behav Brain Sci 17: 293-355, 1994.
71. Westheimer G. Meridional anisotropy in visual processing: implications for the neural site of the oblique effect. Vision Res 43: 2281-2289, 2003.
72. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 63: 1314-1329, 2001.
73. Yakusheva TA, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Blazquez PM, Dickman JD, Angelaki DE. Purkinje cells in posterior cerebellar vermis encode motion in an inertial reference frame. Neuron 54: 973-985, 2007.
74. Young LR, Oman CM, Dichgans JM. Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation. Aviat Space Environ Med 46: 264-268, 1975.
75. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, Darlot C. Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86: 209-230, 2002.