Canal and otolith contributions to visual orientation constancy during sinusoidal roll rotation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1936-1948

  Kaptein, Ronald G ^a   Van Gisbergen, Jan A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HEAD TILTING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOLITH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SEMICIRCULAR CANAL; SENSOR; SIMULATION; SUPINE POSITION; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM; VISUAL ORIENTATION; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION; VESTIBULE; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; OTOLITHIC MEMBRANE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REFLEX, VESTIBULO-OCULAR; ROTATION; SEMICIRCULAR CANALS;

EID: 33645994481     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00856.2005     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anastasopoulos D and Bronstein AM. A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 67: 390-394, 1999.
2. Angelaki DE, McHenry MQ, Dickman JD, Newlands SD, and Hess BJM. Computation of intertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information. J Neurosci 19: 316-327, 1999.
3. Balliet R and Nakayama K. Egocentric orientation is influenced by trained voluntary cyclorotary eye movements. Nature 275: 214-216, 1978.
4. Bartl K, Schneider E, and Glasauer S. Dependence of the torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex on the direction of gravity. Ann NY Acad Sci 1039: 455-458, 2005.
5. Becker W, Nasios G, Raab S, and Jürgens R. Fusion of vestibular and podokinesthetic information during self-turning towards instructed targets. Exp Brain Res 144: 458-474, 2002.
6. Bischof N. Optic-vestibular orientation to the vertical. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vestibular System. Psychophysics, Applied Aspects and General Interpretations, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, vol. IV, pt. 2, p. 155-190.
7. Bos JE and Bles W. Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol Cybern 86: 191-207, 2002.
8. Carpenter RHS. Movements of the Eyes (2nd ed.). London: Pion, 1988.
9. Dichgans J, Held R, Young LR, and Brandt T. Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity. Science 178: 1217-1219, 1972.
10. Dichgans JM, Diener HC, and Brandt T. Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions. Acta Otolaryngol 78: 391-398, 1974.
11. Glasauer S. Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith. Ann NY Acad Sci 656: 847-849, 1992.
12. Glasauer S and Mittelstaedt H. Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity. Brain Res Rev 28: 185-193, 1998.
13. Held R, Dichgans J, and Bauer J. Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation. Vision Res 15: 357-365, 1975.
14. Jaekl PM, Jenkin MR, and Harris LR. Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements. Exp Brain Res 163: 388-399, 2005.
15. Jaggi-Schwarz K, and Hess BJM. Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical. Exp Brain Res 149: 340-350, 2003.
16. Jaggi-Schwarz K, Ortega M, and Hess BJM. Reciprocal error behaviour in estimated body position and subjective visual vertical. Exp Brain Res 150: 122-125, 2003.
17. Kaptein RG and Van Gisbergen JAM. Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. J Neurophysiol 91: 2205-2214, 2004.
18. Kaptein RG and Van Gisbergen JAM. Nature of the transition between two modes of external space perception in tilted subjects. J Neurophysiol 93: 3356-3369, 2005.
19. Keusch S, Hess BJ, and Jaggi-Schwarz K. Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical. Exp Brain Res 155: 283-290, 2004.
20. Klier EM, Angelaki DE, and Hess BJM. The roles of gravitation cues and efference copy signals in the rotational updating of memory saccades. J Neurophysiol 94: 468-478, 2005.
21. Mast FW. Does the world rock when the eyes roll? Allocentric orientation representation, ocular counterroll, and the subjective visual vertical. Swiss J Psychol 59: 89-101, 2000.
22. Mayne R. A systems concept of the vestibular organs. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vestibular System. Psychophysics, Applied Aspects and General Interpretations, edited by Kornhuber H. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, vol. IV, pt. 2, p. 493-580.
23. Merfeld DM. Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation. Acta Otolaryngol 520: 354-359, 1995.
24. Merfeld DM, Park S, C Gianna-Poulin FOB, and Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94: 186-198, 2005.
25. Merfeld DM, Young LR, Oman CM, and Shelhamer MJ. A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. J Vestib Res 3: 141-161, 1993.
26. Merfeld DM and Zupan LH. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. J Neurophysiol 87: 819-833, 2002.
27. Mergner T, Nasios G, Maurer C, and Becker W. Visual object location in space. Interaction of retinal, eye position, vestibular and neck proprioceptive information. Exp Brain Res 141: 33-51, 2001.
28. Mergner T, Siebold C, Schweigart G, and Becker W. Human perception of horizontal trunk and head rotation in space during vestibular and neck stimulation. Exp Brain Res 85: 389-404, 1991.
29. Mezey LE, Curthoys IS, Burgess AN, Goonetilleke SC, and MacDougall HG. Changes in oculor torsion position produced by a single visual line rotating around the line of sight - visual "entrainment" of ocular torsion. Vision Res 44: 397-406, 2004.
30. Mittelstaedt H. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70: 272-281, 1983.
31. Mittelstaedt H. The formation of the visual and postural vertical. In: Multisensory Control of Posture, edited by Mergner T and Hlavacka F. New York: Plenum Press, 1995, p. 147-155.
32. Paige GD and Tomko DL. Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. II. Visual-vestibular interactions and kinematic considerations. J Neurophysiol 65: 1183-1196, 1991.
33. Pavlou M, Wijnberg N, Faldon ME, and Bronstein AM. Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. J Neurophysiol 90: 622-630, 2003.
34. Sauvan XM and Peterhans E. Orientation constancy in neurons of monkey visual cortex. Vis Cogn 6: 43-54, 1999.
35. Schmid-Priscoveanu A, Straumann D, and Kori AA. Torsional vestibuloocular reflex during whole-body oscillation in the upright and the supine position. Exp Brain Res 134: 212-219, 2000.
36. Seidman SH, Telford L, and Paige GD. Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration. Exp Brain Res 119: 307-314, 1998.
37. Sills AW, Honrubia V, and Baloh RW. Is the adaptation model a valid description of the vestibulo-ocular reflex? Biol Cybern 30: 209-220, 1978.
38. Trousselard M, Barraud P, Nougier V, Raphel C, and Cian C. Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity. Cogn Brain Res 20: 355-362, 2004.
39. Udo de Haes HA, and Schöne H. Interaction between statolith organs and semicircular canals on apparent vertical and nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol 69: 25-31, 1970.
40. Van Beuzekom AD, Medendorp WP, and Van Gisbergen JAM. The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt. Vision Res 41: 3229-3242, 2001.
41. Van Pelt S, Van Gisbergen JAM, and Medendorp WP. Visuospatial memory computations during whole-body rotations in roll. J Neurophysiol 94: 1432-1442, 2005.
42. Wade SW and Curthoys IS. The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli. Vision Res 37: 1071-1078, 1997.
43. Wallach H. Perceiving a stable world when one moves. Annu Rev Psychol 38: 1-27, 1987.
44. Wertheim AH. Retinal and extraretinal information in movement perception: how to invert the Filehne illusion. Perception 16: 299-308, 1987.
45. Wurtz RH and Sommer MA. Identifying corollary discharges for movement in the primate brain. Prog Brain Res 144: 47-60, 2004.
46. Young LR. Perception of the body in space: mechanisms. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Sensory Processes. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1984, sect. 1, vol. III, pt. 2, p. 1023-1066.
47. Zupan LH, Merfeld DM, and Darlot C. Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements. Biol Cybern 86: 209-230, 2002.