Put in last position something previously unmentioned: Word order effects on referential expectancy and reference comprehension

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 282-295

  Arnold, Jennifer E ^a   Lao, Shin Yi C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 39049173545     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960701536805     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, pp. 419-439.
2. Almor, A. (1999) Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The information load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106:4, pp. 748-765.
3. Altmann, G. T. M. and Kamide, Y. (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73:3, pp. 247-264.
4. Arnold, J. E. (1998) Reference form and discourse patterns (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, p. 2950.
5. Arnold, J. E. (2001) The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31, pp. 137-162.
6. Arnold, J. E. THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and deaccented noun phrases.
7. Arnold, J. E. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007) Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. The processing and acquisition of reference, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S. and Trueswell, J. C. (2007) Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, pp. 527-565.
9. Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S. and Trueswell, J. C. (2000) The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye tracking. Cognition, 76, pp. B13-B26.
10. Arnold, J. E., Hudson-Kam, C. and Tanenhaus, M. K. If you say "thee uh-" you're describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
11. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. and Fagnano, M. (2004) The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15:9, pp. 578-582.
12. Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Losongco, A. and Ginstrom, R. (2000) Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76, pp. 28-55.
13. Bock, J. K. and Irwin, D. F. (1980) Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, pp. 467-484.
14. Bock, K., Irwin, D. E. and Davidson, D. J. (2004) Putting first things first. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world, pp. 249-278. Psychology Press, New York
15. Chafe, W. L. (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL
16. Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K. and Eberhard, K. M. (2002) Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47:1, pp. 30-49.
17. Chambers, C. and Smyth, R. (1998) Structural parallelism and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, pp. 593-608.
18. Cloitre, M. and Bever, T. G. (1988) Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, pp. 293-322.
19. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K. and Chambers, C. G. (2002) Accent and reference resolution in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, pp. 292-314.
20. Foraker, S. and McElree, B. (2006) The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 357-383.
21. Foraker, S., Nusbaum, H. and Schoeneman, S. (2007) Re-accessing representations: Specificity of meaning for prominent and non-prominent concepts.
22. Garnham, A. (2001) Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora, Psychology Press Ltd, Hove, UK
23. Garrod, S. C. and Sanford, A. J. (1994) Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 675-698. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
24. Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J. and Beeman, M. (1989) Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, pp. 735-755.
25. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. and Gilliom, L. A. (1993) Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, pp. 311-347.
26. Gundel, J. K. (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. Studies in syntactic typology, pp. 209-239. Benjamins, Amsterdam
27. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. and Zacharski, R. (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions. Language, 69, pp. 274-307.
28. Haviland, S. E. and Clark, H. H. (1974) What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, pp. 512-521.
29. Hawkins, J. A. (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
30. Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P. G. and Hyönä, J. (2005) Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science, 16:4, pp. 260-264.
31. Kaiser, E. and Trueswell, J. C. (2004) The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94, pp. 113-147.
32. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M. and Haywood, S. L. (2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49:1, pp. 133-156.
33. Longhurst, E. (2006) ExBuilder
34. McDonald, J. and MacWhinney, B. (1995) The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, pp. 543-566.
35. Ross, J. R. (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax
36. Sanford, A. J. and Garrod, S. C. (1981) Understanding written language, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
37. Staub, A., Clifton Jr, C. and Frazier, L. (2006) Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, pp. 389-406.
38. Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A. and Kleinman, D. (1994) Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, pp. 519-548.
39. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J. and Sanford, A. J. (2000) The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, pp. 423-443.
40. Ward, G. and Birner, B. J. (2001) Discourse and information structure. Handbook of discourse analysis, pp. 119-137. Blackwell, Oxford
41. Wasow, T. (1997) End-weight from the speaker's perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, pp. 347-361.
42. Wasow, T. (2002) Postverbal behavior, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA