The possibilities and limitations of gifted education in korea: A look at the ISEP science-gifted education center

Asia Pacific Education Review

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 450-463

  Han, Ki Soon ^a  

^a SolarLight Ltd   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Differentiated learning experience; Gifted education in Korea; Science gifted education center

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949127985     PISSN: 15981037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03026473     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barone, D. (2003). Turning the looking glass inside out: A gifted student in an at-risk setting. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 259-271.
2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Borland, J. H. (2004). Rethinking gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Colangelo, N., & Brwoer, P. (1987). Gifted youngsters and their siblings: Long-term impact of labeling on their academic and personal self-concepts. Roeper Review, 10, 101-103.
5. Coleman, L., Sanders, M., & Cross, T. (1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 105-111.
6. Coleman, L., & Cross, T. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
7. Cross, T., Coleman, L., & Stewart, R. (1993). The school-based social cognition of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of the giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 16, 37-40.
8. Cross, T., Stewart, R., & Coleman, L. (2003). Phenomenology and its implications for gifted studies research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 201-220.
9. Delcourt, M. (1994). Qualitative extension of the learning outcomes study. Research Monograph, 94-110.
10. Han, K. S. (2004). Why & how we apply PBL in science-gifted education? Paper presented at the 8th Asia-Pacific Conference on giftedness. Dajeon, Korea.
11. Hershey, M., & Oliver, E. (1988). The effects of the label gifted on students identified for gifted programs. Roeper Review, 11, 33-34.
12. Herzog, N. (2003). Impact of gifted programs from the students' perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 131-143.
13. Kerr, B., Colangelo, N., & Gaeth, J. (1988). Gifted adolescents' attitudes toward their giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 245-247.
14. Lee, S. Y., Cramond, B., & Lee, J. (2004). Korean teachers' attitudes toward academic brilliance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 42-53.
15. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Mendaglio, S. (2003). Qualitative case study in gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 163-183.
17. Neumeister, K., & Hebert, T. (2003). Underachievement versus selective achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 221-238.
18. Peine, M. (2003). Doing grounded theory research with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 184-200.
19. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. NY: Chicago University Press.
20. Silverman, L. (1994). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Ground theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Tomlinson, C. (2002). The parallel curriculum. Thousand Oak, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Feng, A. (2004). Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
24. Whitehead, A. (1967). The aims of education and other essays. New York: The Free Press.
25. Woods, P. (1996). Critical students: Breakthroughs in learning. In P. Woods (Ed.), Contemporary issues in teaching and learning. London: Routledge.