Host-parasite interactions in oligotrophic stream ecosystems: The roles of life-history strategy and ecological niche

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 997-1008

  Geist, Juergen ^a   Kuehn, Ralph ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biodiversity hotspot; Bivalve; Conservation prioritization; Freshwater; Salmonid

Indexed keywords

DNA; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIVALVE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RIVER; TROUT;

ANIMALS; BIVALVIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DNA; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RIVERS; TROUT; VARIATION (GENETICS);

BIVALVIA; INVERTEBRATA; MARGARITIFERA MARGARITIFERA; MOLLUSCA; PISCES; SALMO TRUTTA; SALMONIDAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 38849182725     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03636.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anders PJ, Ashley KI (2007) The clear-water paradox of aquatic ecosystem restoration. Fisheries, 32 (3), 125 128.
2. Araujo R, Ramos A (2000) Action Plan for Margaritifera margaritifera in Europe Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats. Strasbourg.
3. Bauer G (1987) Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 691 704.
4. Bauer G (1988) Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel in Central Europe. Biological Conservation, 45, 239 253.
5. Bauer G (1992) Variation in the lifespan and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 425 436.
6. Bauer G (1994) The adaptive value of offspring size among freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 933 944.
7. Bauer G (1997) Host relationships at reversed generation times: Margaritifera (Bivalvia) and salmonids. In : Vertical Food Web Interactions. Ecological Studies, 130 (eds Dettner et al pp. 69 79. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
8. Bernatchez L (2001) The evolutionary history of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) inferred from phylogeographic, nested clade, and mismatch analyses of mitochondrial DNA variation. Evolution, 55, 351 379.
9. Bernatchez L, Guyomard R, Bonhomme F (1992) DNA sequence variation of the mitochondrial control region among geographically and morphologically remote European brown trout Salmo trutta populations. Molecular Ecology, 1, 161 173.
10. Bouza C, Castro J, Martínez P et al 2007) Threatened freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in NW Spain: low and very structured genetic variation in southern peripheral populations assessed using microsatellite markers. Conservation Genetics, DOI.
11. Ciofi C, Bruford MW (1999) Genetic structure and gene flow among Komodo dragon populations inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Molecular Ecology, 8, 17 30. (2MOD programme available at: http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/∼mab/ software.html)
12. Cunjak RA, McGladdery SE (1991) The parasite-host relationship of glochidia (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae) on the gills of young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 353 358.
13. n microsatellites: a new class of genetic markers for Salmo trutta L. (brown trout). Heredity, 71, 488 496.
14. Estoup A, Rousset F, Michalakis Y, Cornuet J-M, Adriamanga M, Guyomard R (1998) Comparative analysis of microsatellite and allozyme markers: a case study investigating microgeographic differentiation in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Molecular Ecology, 7, 339 353.
15. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479 491.
16. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47 50.
17. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology, 10, 1500 1508.
18. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Geist J (2005) Conservation Genetics and Ecology of European Freshwater Pearl Mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). PhD Thesis, Technische Universität München, available online at: http://www.weihenstephan.de/ zpf/fisch/Mitarbeiter/Geist.htm.
20. Geist J, Auerswald K (2007) Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshwater Biology, 52, 2299 2316.
21. Geist J, Kuehn R (2005) Genetic diversity and differentiation of central European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) populations: implications for conservation and management. Molecular Ecology, 14, 425 239.
22. Geist J, Rottmann O, Schröder W, Kühn R (2003) Development of microsatellite markers for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 444 446.
23. Geist J, Porkka M, Kuehn R (2006) The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) streams. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 251 266.
24. Gleick PH (2003) Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science, 302, 1524 1528.
25. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). URL: http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/ fstat.html
26. Hamilton KE, Ferguson A, Taggart JB, Tomasson T, Walker A, Fahy E (1989) Post-glacial colonisation of brown trout, Salmo trutta L.: Ldh-5 as a phylogeographic marker locus. Journal of Fish Biology, 35, 651 664.
27. Hastie LC, Young MR (2003) Conservation of the freshwater pearl mussel 2. relationship with salmonids. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Conservation Techniques Series No. 3. English Nature, Peterborough.
28. Jungbluth JR, Coomans HE, Groh H (1985) Bibliographie der Flussperlmuschel Margaritifera margaritifera (Linn. 1785). Verslagenen Technische Gegevens No. 41; Institut voor Taxonomische Zoologie, Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
29. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) mega3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetic analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5, 150 163.
30. Marchordom A, Araujo R, Erpenbeck D, Ramos MA (2003) Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the endangered European Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 78, 235 252.
31. Miguel ES, Monserrat S, Fernández C et al 2004) Growth models and longevity of pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in Spain. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 1370 1379.
32. Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, Nurthen RK, Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2000) Relationships between population size and loss of genetic diversity: Comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conservation Genetics, 1, 33 43.
33. Mutvei H, Westermark T (2001) How environmental information can be obtained from naiad shells. In : Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of the freshwater mussels Unionoidea. Ecological Studies, 145 (eds Bauer G, Wächtler K), pp. 367 379. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
34. Muus BJ, Dahlström P (1981) Süßwasserfische Europas - Biologie, Fang, wirtschaftliche Bedeutung; BLV Bestimmungsbuch; 5. Aufl. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München.
35. Nicholson E, Possingham HP (2006) Objectives for multiple-species conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 20, 871 881.
36. O'Reilly PT, Hamilton LC, McConnell SK, Wright JM (1996) Rapid analysis of genetic variation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by PCR multiplexing of dinucleotide and tetranucleotide microsatellites. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 2292 2298.
37. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288 295.
38. Petit RJ, Mousadik EL, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology, 12, 844 855.
39. Poulin R, Marshall LJ, Spencer HG (2000) Metazoan parasite species richness and genetic variation among freshwater fish species: cause or consequence? International Journal of Parasitology, 30, 697 703.
40. Presa P, Guyomard R (1996) Conservation of microsatellites in three species of salmonids. Journal of Fish Biology, 49, 1326 1329.
41. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) genepop, Version 3.3: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 249.
42. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology, 17, 230 237.
43. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American fauna. Conservation Biology, 13, 1220 1222.
44. Sakamoto T, Okamoto N, Ikeda Y, Nakamura Y, Sato T (1994) Dinucleotide-repeat polymorphism in DNA of rainbow trout and its application in fisheries science. Journal of Fish Biology, 44, 1093 1096.
45. Skinner A, Young M, Hastie L (2003) Ecology of the freshwater pearl mussel. Conserving Natura 2000 Rivers Ecology Series no. 2 English Nature, Peterborough.
46. Stein BA, Flack SR (1997) Species Report Card: the State of U.S. Plants and Animals. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
47. Stein BA, Master LL, Morse LE (2002) Taxonomic bias and vulnerable species. Science, 297, 1807 1807.
48. Strayer DL (2006) Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25, 271 287.
49. Strayer DL, Downing JA, Haag WR et al 2004) Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America's most imperiled animals. Bioscience, 54, 429 439.
50. Suárez J, Bautista JM, Almodóvar A, Marchordom A (2001) Evolution of the mitochondrial control region in Palaearctic brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations: the biogeographical role of the Iberian peninsula. Heredity, 87, 198 206.
51. Vähä J-P, Erkinaro J, Niemelä E, Primmer CR (2007) Life-history and habitat features influence the within-river genetic structure of Atlantic salmon. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2638 2654.
52. Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 46, 1431 1446.
53. Young M, Williams J (1984a) The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel in Scotland. II. Laboratory Studies. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 100, 29 43.
54. Young MR, Williams JC (1984b) The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (Linn.) in Scotland. I. Field Studies. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 99, 405 422.
55. Young MR, Cosgrove PJ, Hastie LC (2001) The extent of, and causes for, the decline of a highly threatened naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera. In : Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoidea (eds Bauer G, Wächtler K). Ecological Studies, 145, pp. 337 357. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
56. Ziuganov V, Zotin A, Nezlin L, Tretiakov V (1994) The Freshwater Pearl mussels and their Relationships with Salmonid Fish. VNIRO, Russian Federal Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow.