Oncological and Functional Results of Antegrade Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer

European Urology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 554-563

  Carini, Marco ^a   Masieri, Lorenzo ^a   Minervini, Andrea ^a   Lapini, Alberto ^a   Serni, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Antegrade prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ONCOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PENILE ERECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 38749145590     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Walsh P.C., and Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128 (1982) 492-497
2. Touijer K., and Guillonneau B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of surgical quality. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 625-632
3. Stolzenburg J.U., Rabenalt R., Do M., et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174 (2005) 1271-1275
4. Partin A.W., Kattan M.W., Subong E.N., et al. Combination of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA 277 (1997) 1445-1451
5. Serni S., Masieri L., Lapini A., et al. A low incidence of positive surgical margins in prostate cancer at high risk of extracapsular extension after a modified anterograde radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 93 (2003) 279-283
6. Campbell E.W. Total prostatectomy with preliminary ligation of the vascular pedicles. J Urol 81 (1959) 464-467
7. Mittemeyer B.T., and Cox H.D. Modified radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 12 (1978) 313-320
8. Costantini A., Selli C., Carini M., et al. Nerve sparing retropubic prostatectomy: technical modifications. J Urol 143 (1990) 177A (abstract no. V22)
9. Curto F., Benijts J., Pansadoro A., et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 344-352
10. Han M., Partin A.W., Zahurak M., Piantadosi S., Epstein J.I., and Walsh P.C. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169 (2003) 517-523
11. Emerson R.E., Koch M.O., Jones T.D., Daggy J.K., Juliar B.E., and Cheng L. The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence. J Clin Pathol 58 (2005) 1028-1032
12. Swindle P., Eastham J.A., Ohori M., et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174 (2005) 903-907
13. Wieder J.A., and Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160 (1998) 299-315
14. Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F., et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 167 (2002) 528-534
15. Chun F.K.-H., Graefen M., Zacharias M., et al. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long term recurrence free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. Word J Urol 24 (2006) 273-280
16. Guillonneau B., EL-Fettouh H., Baumert H., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at the Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169 (2003) 1261-1266
17. Petros J.A., and Catalona W.J. Antegrade approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with difficult apical dissection. J Urol 145 (1991) 994-997
18. Heidenreich A., Varga Z., and Von Knobloch R. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of limph node metastasis. J Urol 167 (2002) 1681-1686
19. Rohel K.A., Han M., Ramos G.C., Antenor J.A.V., and Catalona W.J. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3478 consecutive patients: long term results. J Urol 172 (2004) 910-914
20. Stamey T.A., Mc Neal J.E., Yemoto C.M., Sigal B.M., and Johnstone I.M. Biological determinants of cancer progression in man with prostate cancer. JAMA 281 (1999) 1395-1400
21. Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Ricker D., and Burnett A.L. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urol 55 (2000) 58-61
22. Kundu S.D., Rohel K.A., Eggener S., Antenor J.A.V., Han M., and Catalona W.J. Potency, continence and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172 (2004) 2227-2231
23. Stanford J.L., Feng Z., Hamilton A.S., et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283 (2000) 354-360
24. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S., et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51 (2007) 648-658
25. Guazzoni G., Cestari A., Naspro R., et al. Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 98-104
26. Carini M., Masieri L., Minervini A., and Serni S. Re: Giorgio Guazzoni, Andrea Cestari, Richard Naspro, et al. Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 98-104 Eur Urol 2007;51:858-9
27. Maffezzini M., Seveso M., Taverna G., et al. Evaluation of complications and results in a contemporary series of 300 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies with the anatomic approach at a single institution. Urology 61 (2003) 982-986
28. Augustin H., Hammerer P., Graefen M., et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol 43 (2003) 113-118
29. Kursh E.D., and Bodner D.R. Alternative of nerve-sparing when performing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 32 (1988) 205-209