The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1028-1032

  Emerson, R E ^b   Koch, M O ^b   Jones, T D ^b   Daggy, J K ^b   Juliar, B E ^b   Cheng, L ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; ORGAN WEIGHT; PERINEURIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 26244435283     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.025882     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cheng L, Darson MF, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86:1775-82.
2. Kupelian P, Katcher J, Levin H, et al. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 1996;48:249-60.
3. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Prostate specific antigen outcome based on the extent of extracapsular extension and margin status in patients with seminal vesicle negative prostate carcinoma of Gleason score < or = 7. Cancer 2000;88:2110-15.
4. Weider JA, Soloway MS. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;160:299-315.
5. Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1995;154:1818-24.
6. Paulson DF, Walther PJ. Is grade or stage of primary importance in determining the outcome after radical prostatectomy for disease clinically confined to the prostate? Br J Urol 1989;63:301-5.
7. Watson RB, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 1996;48:80-90.
8. Paulson DF. Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease. J Urol 1994;152:1826-30.
9. van den Ouden D, Bentvelsen FM, Boeve ER, et al. Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression. Br J Urol 1993;72:489-94.
10. Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML, et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 1,143 patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2254-63.
11. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997;50:733-9.
12. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Seay TM, et al. Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status. Cancer 1998;82:902-8.
13. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993;71:3582-93.
14. Epstein JI. Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Clin North Am 1996;23:651-63.
15. Cheng L, Slezak J, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2862-8.
16. Eichelberger LE, Koch MO, Daggy JK, et al. Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:386-91.
17. McNeal JE, Villers AA, Redwine EA, et al. Capsular penetration in prostate cancer: significance for natural history and treatment. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:240-7.
18. Jones EC. Resection margin status in radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens: relationship to type of operation, tumor size, tumor grade and local tumor extension. J Urol 1990;144:89-93.
19. Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Partin AW, et al. Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of follow up. J Urol 1993;149:1478-81.
20. Han M, Pound CR, Potter SR, et al. Isolated local recurrence is rare after radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancer and positive surgical margins: therapeutic implications. J Urol 2001;165:864-6.
21. Poulos CK, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens. Cancer 2004;101:527-32.
22. Poulos CK, Koch MO, Eble JN, et al. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence. Cancer 2004;101:1563-8.
23. Hong H, Koch MO, Foster RS, et al. Anatomic distribution of periprostatic adipose tissue: a mapping study of 100 radical prostatectomy specimens. Cancer 2003;97:1639-43.
24. Cheng L, Koch MO, Daggy JK, et al. The combined percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2911-17.
25. Emerson RE, Koch MO, Doggy J, et al. Closest distance between tumor and resection margin in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:224-9.
26. Ng JC, Koch MO, Daggy JK, et al. Perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prognostic significance. J Urol 2004;172:2249-51.
27. Humphrey PA, Vollmer RT. Intraglandular tumor extent and prognosis in prostatic carcinoma: application of a grid method to prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 1990;21:799-804.
28. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. Philadelphia: Raven and Lippincott, 1997.
29. Eichelberger LE, Cheng L. Does pT2b prostate carcinoma exist? Critical appraisal of the 2002 TNM classification of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:2573-6.
30. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histologic grading and clinical stage. J Urol 1974;111:58-64.
31. Babaian RJ, Troncoso P, Bhadkamkar VA, et al. Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2001;91:1414-22.
32. Koch MO, Foster RS, Bell B, et al. Characterization and predictors of prostate specific antigen progression rates after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2000;164:749-53.
33. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Prostate-specific antigen failure despite pathologically organ-confined and margin negative prostate cancer: the basis for an adjuvant therapy trial. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:1465-9.
34. Greene FL, Page DL, Flemming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
35. Epstein JI. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection: the significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:626-32.
36. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Potter SR, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: prognostic stratification based on pathologic parameters. Urology 2000;56:283-8.
37. Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Walsh PC. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicle: definition and relation of tumor volume, grade and margins of resection to prognosis. J Urol 1993;149:1040-5.
38. Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H, et al. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1995;153:1565-9.
39. Gorbonos A, Ohori M, Maru H, et al. Prognostic significance of the site of the positive margin (+SM) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. J Urol 2003;169:457.
40. Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, et al. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology 1999;54:682-8.