Course evaluations: A tendency to respond “favourably” on scales?

Quality Assurance in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-18

  Darby, Jenny A ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Performance measures; Students; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749144448     PISSN: 09684883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09684880810848387     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bassin, W.M. (1974), “A note on the biases in students' evaluations of instructors'”, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 43, pp. 16-17.
2. Boland, M., Lehman, E. and Stroade, J. (2001), “A comparison of curriculum baccalaureate degree programs in agribusiness”, The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 225-35.
3. Bourque, L.B. and Fielder, E.P. (1995), How to Conduct Self-administered and Mail Surveys, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Coladarci, T. and Kornfield, I. (2007), “RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching”, Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 2-15.
5. Collins, J.W. (1996), “Intellectual motivation and its relationship to selected characteristics of collegiate business and liberal arts majors”, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 56 Nos 10-A, p. 3886.
6. Crumbley, L., Henry, B.K. and Kratchman, S.H. (2001), “Students' perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 197-207.
7. Darby, J.A. (2006), “The effects of the elective or required status of courses on student evaluations”, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 19-29.
8. Dawes, R.M. and Smith, T. (1985), “Attitude and opinion measurement”, in Lindsay, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, Random House, New York, NY, pp. 509-66.
9. Defusco, M.B. (1999), “An exploration of the relationship between class size and students' ratings of teaching quality at the University of Phoenix: do adult students make a difference?”, Dissertation Abstracts International section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 60 Nos 6-A, p. 1901.
10. De Vaus, D.A. (1991), Surveys in Social Research, 3rd ed., Unwin Hyman, London.
11. Florian, L. and Rouse, M. (2001), “Inclusive practice in English secondary schools: lessons learned”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 399-412.
12. Fowler, F.J. (2002), Survey Research Methods, Sage, London.
13. Garvar-Pinhas, A. and Schmelkin, L.P. (1989), “Administrators' and teachers' attitudes towards mainstreaming”, Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 10, pp. 38-43.
14. Grand, L.C. (2000), The Workplace Skills: Presentation Guide, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
15. Greenwald, A.G. and Gillmore, G.M. (1997), “Grading leniency is a removable contamination of student ratings”, American Psychologist, Vol. 52, pp. 1209-17.
16. Hayes, N. (2000), Doing Psychological Research, Open University Press, Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA.
17. Holcomb, J. (1998), Training Evaluation Made Easy: Making Your Training Worth Every Penny, Kogan Page, London.
18. Howe, K.R. and Welner, K.G. (2002), “School choice and the pressure to perform: déjà vu for children with disabilities?”, Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 212-21.
19. John, O.P. and Robbins, R.W. (1994), “Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 206-19.
20. Liaw, S.H. and Goh, K.L. (2003), “Evidence and control biases in student evaluations of teaching”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 37-43.
21. McGoldrick, K. and Schuhmann, P.W. (2002), “Instructor gender and student registration: an analysis of preferences”, Education Economics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 241-60.
22. Maynard, D.C., Bachiochi, P.D. and Luna, A.C. (2002), “An evaluation of industrial/organizational psychology teaching modules for use in introductory psychology”, Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 39-43.
23. Oppenheim, A.N. (1992), Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Pinter Publications, New York, NY,.
24. Perkins, D., Guerin, D. and Schleh, J. (1990), “Effects of grading standards information, assigned grade, and grade discrepancies on students' evaluations”, Psychological Reports, Vol. 66, pp. 635-42.
25. Rae, L. (2002), Assessing the Value of Your Training: The Evaluation Process From Training Needs to the Report to the Board, Gower Publishing Co., Aldershot.
26. Salas, E., Milham, L.M. and Bowers, C.A. (2003), “Training evaluation in the military: misconceptions, opportunities, and challenges”, Military Psychology, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 3-16.
27. Schmidt, H.G. and Moust, J.H.C. (2000), “Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: a review of research”, in Evensen, D.H. and Hmelo, E. (Eds), Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 19-51.
28. Schwarz, N., Knauper, B., Hippler, H.J., Noelle-Neumann, E. and Clark, F. (1991), “Rating scales: numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels”, Public Opinion Quarterley, Vol. 55, pp. 570-82.
29. Shaughnessy, J.J., Zechmeister, E.B. and Zechmeister, J.S. (2000), Research Methods in Psychology, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
30. VanderStoep, S.W., Fagerlin, A. and Feenstra, J.S. (2000), “What do students remember from Introductory Psychology?”, Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 89-92.
31. Ward, J., Center, Y. and Bochner, S. (1994), “A question of attitudes: integrating children with disabilities into regular classrooms?”, British Journal of Special Education, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 34-9.
32. Wachtel, K.H. (1998), “Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: a brief review”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 191-211.
33. Wells, L.E. and Marwell, G. (1976), Self Esteem: Its Conceptualisation and Measurement, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA.