Instructor gender and student registration: An analysis of preferences

Education Economics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 241-260

  McGoldrick, Kimmarie ^a   Schuhmann, Peter W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STUDENT;

EID: 0036977804     PISSN: 09645292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09645290210127480     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Basow, S. A. (1995) Student evaluations of college professors: when gender matters, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, pp. 656-665.
2. Basow, S. A. & Silberg, N. T. Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, pp. 308-314.
3. Bennett, S. K. (1982) Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, pp. 170-179.
4. Feldman, K. (1993) College students' views of male and female college teachers: part II-evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers, Research in Higher Education, 34, pp. 151-211.
5. Ferber, M. A. & Huber, J. A. (1975) Sex of student and instructor: a study of student bias, American Journal of Sociology, 80, pp. 949-963.
6. Freeman, H. R. (1992) Effect of instructor gender and gender role on student willingness to take a psychology course, Teaching of Psychology, 19, pp. 93-95.
7. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. & Black, W. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edn. (Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall).
8. Kaschak, E. (1981) Another look at sex bias in students' evaluations of professors: d winners get the recognition that they have been given?, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, pp. 767-772.
9. Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P. & Dill, H. (1988) Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in students' ratings of instructors, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, pp. 342-344.
10. Lombardo, J. P. & Tocci, M. E. (1979) Attributions of positive and negative characteristics of instructors as a function of attractiveness and sex of instructor and sex of subject, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, pp. 491-494.
11. Reibstein, D., Bateson, J. G. & Boulding, W. (1987) Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings, Technical Working Paper (Report No. 87-102) (Cambridge, MA, Marketing Science Institute).
12. Schuhmann, P. & McGoldrick, K. (1999) A conjoint analysis of student registration decision making: implications for enrollment, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching.
13. Shukla, P. K. & Bruno, J. (1992) Use of conjoint analysis and marketing approaches in education surveys, Education, 112, pp. 451-458.
14. Tatro, C. N. (1995) Gender effects on student evaluations of faculty, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, pp. 169-173.
15. Tieman, C. R. & Rankin-Ullock, B. (1985) Student evaluations of teachers: an examination of the effect of sex and field study, Teaching Sociology, 12, pp. 177-191.