A wide variety of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR appearances of breast cancer: Pathologic correlation study

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 286-292

  Onishi, Masayuki ^a   Furukawa, Akira ^a   Takahashi, Masashi ^a   Murata, Kiyoshi ^a  

^a SHIGA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Diagnosis; Dynamic MRI; MRI; Pathology; Variation

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; DYNAMIC MODELS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOLOGY; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST CANCER; DYNAMIC MRI; HISTOPATHOLOGY; TUMOR-RIM-ENHANCEMENT;

TUMORS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROSIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURGERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DRUG UPTAKE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE INTENSIFIER; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMARY GLAND; MASTECTOMY; MICROVASCULATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 38749135847     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Orel S.G., Schrall M.D., LiVolsi V.A., and Troupin R.H. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190 (1994) 485-493
2. Weinreb J.C., and Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 196 (1994) 593-610
3. Rubens D., Totterman S., Chacko A.K., et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157 (1991) 267-270
4. Kerslake R.W., Carleton P.J., Fox J.N., et al. Dynamic gradient echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast MRI of the breast. Clin Radiol 50 (1995) 440-454
5. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Lee M.J., et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: Features and positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 171-178
6. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., and Klaschik S. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
7. Sherif H., Mahfouz A.E., Oellinger H., et al. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Radiology 205 (1997) 209-213
8. Kinkel K., Helbich T.H., Essserman L.J., et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 35-43
9. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., and Orel S.G. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 219 (2001) 484-494
10. Schnall M.D., and Ikeda D.M. Lesion Diagnosis Working Group report. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999) 982-990
11. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G., et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202 (1997) 833-841
12. Baum F., Fischer U., Vosshenrich R., and Grabbe E. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12 (2002) 1087-1092
13. Weidner N., Semple J.P., Welch W.R., and Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324 (1991) 1-8
14. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 200 (1996) 639-649
15. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 (1997) 421-430
16. Buckley D.L., Drew P.J., Mussurakis S., Monson J.R., and Horsman A. Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 7 (1997) 461-464
17. Mussurakis S., Buckley D.L., and Horsman A. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors. Br J Radiol 70 (1997) 446-451
18. Weind K.L., Maier C.F., Rutt B.K., and Moussa M. Invasive carcinomas and fibroadenomas of the breast: comparison of microvessel distributions-implications for imaging modalities. Radiology 208 (1998) 477-483
19. Matsubayashi R., Matsuo Y., Edakuni G., Satoh T., Tokunaga O., and Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 217 (2000) 841-848
20. Isomoto I., Koshiishi T., Okimoto T., Okada H., Uetani M., and Hayashi K. Gradually enhancing breast cancer on dynamic MRI. Nippon Acta Radiologica 60 (2000) 514-519 [in Japanese]
21. Kawashima M., Tamaki Y., Nonaka T., et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR 129 (2002) 179-183
22. Daniel B.L., Yen Y.F., Glover G.H., et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology 209 (1998) 499-508
23. Shiraishi A., Suzuki M., Nozu S., Suzuki H., Kurosumi M., and Katayama H. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent and enhancement patterns using 3D-dynamic MR imaging: correlation with intraductal component. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 59 (1999) 122-130 [in Japanese]
24. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Siegelman E.S., et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR 169 (1997) 409-415
25. Kuhl C.K., Bieling H.B., Lutterbey G., Sommer T., Keller E., and Schild H.H. Standardization and acceleration of quantitative analysis of dynamic MR mammographies via parametric images and automatized ROI definition. Rofo Forschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 164 (1996) 475-482 [in German]
26. Frouge C., Guinebretiere J.M., Contesso G., Di Paola R., and Blery M. Correlation between contrast enhancement in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast and tumor angiogenesis. Invest Radiol 29 (1994) 1043-1049
27. Hulka C.A., Smith B.L., Sgroi D.C., et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 197 (1995) 33-38
28. Sardanelli F., Fausto A., Iozzelli A., Rescinito G., and Calabrese M. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging effect of changing the region of interest on early enhancement using 2D and 3D techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 (2004) 642-646
29. Stoutjesdijk M.J., Futtterer J.J., Boetes C., van Die L.E., Jager G., and Barentsz J.O. Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 40 (2005) 355-362