Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: Correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 70, Issue MAY, 1997, Pages 446-451

  Mussurakis, S ^a   Buckley, D L ^a   Horsman, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GRADING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0030916382     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227224     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, et al. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. JCAT 1986;10:199-204.
2. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995;196:593-610.
3. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493-501.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995;196,115-22.
5. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743-7.
6. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Clin Radiol 1995;50:440-54.
7. Stelling CB. Breast cancer staging with contrast material-enhanced MR imaging: should it change patient treatment? [editorial]. Radiology 1995;196:16-18.
8. McGuire WL, Clark GM. Prognostic factors and treatment decisions in axillary-node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1756-61.
9. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne H, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast Acta Oncol 1992;31:833-42.
10. Merchant TE, Obertop H, de Graaf PW. Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging in breast surgery treatment planning. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993;25:257-64.
11. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Bowsley SJ, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmaco-kinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma. Invest Radiol 1995;30:650-62.
12. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Drew PJ, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. Clin Radiol, In press.
13. Buckley DL, Kerslake RW, Blackband SJ, Horsman A. Quantitative analysis of multislice Gd-DTPA enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:646-51.
14. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. JCAT, In press.
15. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-6.
16. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, et al. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990;174;491-4.
17. Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL, Richman RH. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:563-8.
18. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Coady AM. et al. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Br J Radiol 1996;69:1009-16.
19. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991:336-51.
20. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast cancer by use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, In press.
21. Furman-Haran E, Margalit R, Grobgeld D, Degani H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:6247-51.
22. Jain RK. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res 1988;48:2641-58.
23. Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic micro-environment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res 1989;49:6449-65.
24. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis - correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1-8.
25. Horak ER, Leek R, Klenk, N, et al. Angiogenesis, assessed by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies, as indicator of node metastases and survival in breast cancer. Lancet 1992;340:1120-4.
26. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;197,387-95.
27. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Livolsi VA, Troupin RH, Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-93.