Darwinian creativity in the classroom?

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 375-379

  Beghetto, Ronald A ^a   Plucker, Jonathan A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749129126     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410701753333     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 1, 73-79.
2. Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: "All roads lead to creativity" or "You can't get there from here"? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316-332). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in scientific discovery. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
4. Cohen, L. M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169-183.
5. Joseph, D. (2004). The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist, 39, 235-242.
6. MaKinster, J. G., Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Why can't I find Newton's Third Law? Case studies of students' use of the Web as a science resource. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 11, 155-172.
7. Mumford, M. D. (2007). Debates about the "general" picture: Cognition and creative achievement. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 367-374.
8. Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.
9. Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & Masciotra, D. (2002). From thing to sign and "natural object": Toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27, 327-356.
10. Roth, W.-M., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Students' talk about rotational motion within and across contexts, and implications for future learning. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 151-179.
11. Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21-30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (Eds.) (1997). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Simonton, D. K. (2005). Darwin as straw man: Dasgupta's (2004) evaluation of creativity as a Darwinian process. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 299-208.
15. Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative process in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonie improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344.
16. Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L., (Eds.). (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75-101.
18. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5-24.
19. Weisberg, R. W., & Hass, R. (2007). We are all partly right: Comment on Simonton. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 345-360.