Debates about the "general" picture: Cognition and creative achievement

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 367-374

  Mumford, Michael D ^a   Antes, Alison L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749130447     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410701753325     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.
2. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
3. Bejar, I. I., Chaffin, R., & Embretson, S. E. (1991). Cognitive and psychometric analysis of analogical problem solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
5. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506.
6. Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
7. Csikszentmihaly, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 312-338). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dean, J. W., Jr., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 368-396.
9. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: Heath.
10. Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99-116.
11. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Estes,W. K. (1991). Cognitive architectures from the standpoint of an experimental psychologist. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 1-28.
13. Estes, Z., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 144-156.
14. Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1908).
17. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
18. Gruber, H. E. (1996). The life space of a scientist: The visionary function and other aspects of Jean Piaget's thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 251-265.
19. Gruszka, A., & Necka, E. (2002). Priming and acceptance of close and remote associations by creative and less creative people. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 193-205.
20. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., Ligon, G. S., Hunsicker, C. M., & Mumford, M. D. (in press). Applying multiple knowledge structures in creative thought: Effects on idea generation and problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal.
21. Kaizer, C., & Shore, B. M. (1995). Strategy flexibility in more and less competent students on mathematical word problems. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 77-82.
22. Licuanan, B., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (in press). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Creativity Research Journal.
23. Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
24. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
25. Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-21.
26. Mumford, M. D. (Ed.). (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
27. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., ReiterPalmon, R. & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
28. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammario & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3-25). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
29. Mumford, M. D., & VanDoorn, J. R. (2001). The leadership of pragmatism: Reconsidering Franklin in the age of charisma. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 279-309.
30. O'Hara, K. P., & Payne, S. J. (1998). The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 34-70.
31. Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Russ, S. W. (2003). Creativity research: Whither thou goest.... Creativity Research Journal, 15, 143-145.
33. Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Contractual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 21-36.
34. Simonton, D. K. (1998). Masterpieces in music and literature: Historiometric inquiries. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 103-110.
35. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian?. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309-328.
36. Simonton, D. K. (this issue). The creative process in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants? Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344.
37. Tweney, R. D. (1992). Inventing the field: Michael Faraday and the creative 'engineering' of electromagnetic field theory. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive creativity in technology (pp. 31-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
39. Weisberg, R. W. (2003). Cases of innovation. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook of Innovation (pp. 204-247). Boston: Pergamon.
40. Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23-54.
41. Weisberg, R. W., & Hass, R. (this issue). We are all partly right: Comment on Simonton. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 345-360.