Performance effects of organizational learning in a transitional economy

Problems and Perspectives in Management

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 56-67

  Dimovski, Vlado ^a   Škerlavaj, Miha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Organizational learning; Organizational performance; Stakeholder theory; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 38649129486     PISSN: 17277051     EISSN: 18105467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Argyris, C., D.A. Schön. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. - Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
2. Bentler, P.M. Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. // Psychological Bulletin, 1990. - Vol. 107, No. 2. - pp. 238.
3. Bollen, K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. - New York: Wiley, 1989.
4. Cohen, W.M., D.A. Levinthal. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. // Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990. - Vol. 35, No. 1. - pp. 128-152.
5. Cyert, R.M., J.G. March. Behavioural Theory of the Firm. - Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1963.
6. Darr, E.D., L. Argote, D. Epple. The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises. // Management Science, 1995. - Vol. 41, No. 11. - pp. 1750 - 1762.
7. Diamantopoulos, A., J.A. Siguaw. Introducing LISREL. - London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
8. Dimovski, V. Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage, PhD Thesis. - Cleveland, 1994.
9. De Geus, A.P. Planning as Learning // Harvard Business Review, 1988. - Vol. 88, No. 2. - pp. 70 -74.
10. Easterby-Smith, M., M. Lyles. The Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. - London: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
11. Figueiredo, P.N. Learning Processes Features: How do They Influence Inter-firm Differences in Technological Capability - Accumulation Paths and Operational Performance Improvement? // International Journal of Technology Management, 2003. - Vol. 26, No. 7. - pp. 655 - 689.
12. Freeman, E.R. Strategic Management - A Stakeholder Approach. - London: Pitman, 1984.
13. Freeman, E.R. Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. // Business Ethics Quarterly, 1994. - No. 4. - pp. 409 - 422.
14. Gebring, D.W., J.C. Anderson. Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness-of-fit Indices for Structural Equation Models. - K. Bollen and J. S. Long (eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1993.
15. Huber, G.P. Organizational Learning: The Contributing Process and the Literatures. // Organization Science, 1991. - No. 2. - pp. 88-115.
16. Jones, G.R. Organizational Theory, 3rd edition. New York: Prentice Hall, 2000.
17. Jöreskog, K.G., D. Sörbrom. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modelling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1993.
18. Kaplan, R.S., D.P. Norton Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance. // Harvard Business Review, 1992. - No. 1/2. - pp. 71-79.
19. Kaplan, R.S., D.P. Norton. Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. // Harvard Business Review, 1993. - No. 9/10. - pp. 134-147.
20. Kaplan, R.S., D.P. Norton. Using the Balanced Scorecard as Strategic Management System. // Harvard Business Review, 1996. - No.1/2. - pp. 75-85.
21. Kaplan, R.S., D.P. Norton. The Balanced Scorecard. - Boston: Harvard Business School, 1996a.
22. Kogut, B. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. // Strategic Management Journal, 1988. - No. 9. - pp. 319-332.
23. Lam, S.S.K. Organizational Performance and Learning Styles in Hong Kong. // Journal of Social Psychology, 1998. - Vol. 138, No. 3. - pp. 401-403.
24. Lane, H.W., P.W. Beamish. Cross-cultural Cooperative behaviour in Joint ventures in LDCs. // Management International Review, 1990. - No. 30. - pp. 87-102.
25. Lyles, M. Learning among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms. // Management International Review, 1988. - No. 28. - pp. 85-98.
26. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. A Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. // International Journal of Technology Management, 1996. - Vol. 11, No. 7/8. - pp. 833-46.
27. Pisano, G.M., R.M.J. Bohmer, A.C. Edmondson. Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning: Evidence from the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. // Management Science, 2001. - Vol. 47, No. 6. - pp. 752-768.
28. Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. - London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
29. Senge, P.M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization. - New York: Currency Doubleday, 1990.
30. Shrivastava, P. A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems. // Journal of Management Studies, 1983. - No. 20. - pp. 1-28.
31. Simonin, B.L. The Importance of Collaborative Know-how: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization. // Academy of Management Journal, 1997. - Vol. 40, No. 5. - pp. 1150-1173.
32. Sloan, T. R., Hyland, P.W.B., Beckett, R.C. Learning as a Competitive Advantage: Innovative Training in the Australian Aerospace Industry. // International Journal of Technology Management, 2002. - Vol. 23, No. 4. - pp. 341-52.
33. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. - Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
34. Tsang, E.W.K. Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization - A Dichotomy between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research, Human Relations, 50, 1, pp. 73-89, 1997.
35. Wall, B. Measuring the Right Stuff: Identifying and Applying the Right Knowledge. // Knowledge Management Review, 1998. - Vol. 1, No. 4. - pp. 20-24.
36. Van Wiijk, R., F.A.J. Van Den Bosch, H.W. Volberda. Knowledge and Networks. // Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (eds): The Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. London: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.