Evaluation and QSAR modeling on multiple endpoints of estrogen activity based on different bioassays

Chemosphere

Volumn 70, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1889-1897

  Liu, Huanxiang ^a   Papa, Ester ^a   Gramatica, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Endocrine disruptor; Environmental estrogens; Estrogen activity index; In vitro assay; Principal component analysis (PCA); QSAR

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL ESTROGENS; ESTROGEN ACTIVITY INDEX; QSAR;

BIOASSAY;

ESTROGEN;

BIOASSAY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOASSAY; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MODELING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ESTROGEN ACTIVITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SCREENING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; CELL PROLIFERATION; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS; ESTROGENS; GENES, REPORTER; HUMANS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN;

EID: 38649111953     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.071     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen H.R., Andersson A.M., and Arnold S.F. Comparison of short-term estrogenicity tests for identification of hormone-disrupting chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 107 Suppl. 1 (1999) 89-108
2. Asikainen A., Ruuskanen J., and Tuppurainen K. Consensus kNN QSAR: A versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 6724-6729
3. Burden F.R. A chemically intuitive molecular index based on the eigenvalues of a modified adjacency matrix. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 16 (1997) 309-314
4. Coldham N.G., Dave M., Sivapathasundaram S., McDonnell D.P., Connor C., and Sauer M.J. Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 (1997) 734-742
5. Devillers J. QSAR modeling of large heterogeneous sets of molecules. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 12 (2001) 515-528
6. Devillers J., Marchand-Geneste N., Dore J.C., Porcher J.M., and Poroikov V. Endocrine disruption profile analysis of 11,416 chemicals from chemometrical tool. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007) 181-193
7. Eriksson L., Jaworska J., Worth A.P., Cronin M.T.D., McDowell R.M., and Gramatica P. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003) 1361-1375
8. Fang H., Tong W., and Perkins R. Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 (2000) 723-729
9. Gaido K.W., Leonard L.S., Lovell S., Gould J.C., Babai D., Portier C.J., and McDonnell D.P. Evaluation of chemicals with endocrine modulating activity in a yeast-based steroid hormone receptor gene transcription assay. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 143 (1997) 205-212
10. Gallegos Saliner A., Netzeva T.I., and Worth A. Prediction of estrogenicity: validation of a classification model. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 17 (2006) 195-223
11. Gramatica P. Principles of QSAR model validation: internal and external. QSAR & Comb. Sci. 26 (2007) 694-701
12. Gramatica P., Pozzi S., Consonni V., and Guardo A.D. Classification of environmental pollutants for global mobility potential. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13 (2002) 205-217
13. Gramatica P., and Di Guardo A.D. Screening of pesticides for environmental partitioning tendency. Chemosphere 47 (2002) 947-956
14. Gramatica P., Pilutti P., and Papa E. A tool for the assessment of VOC degradability by tropospheric oxidants starting from chemical structure. Atmos. Environ. 38 (2004) 6167-6175
15. Hong H., Tong W., Fang H., Shi L., Xie Q., Wu J., Perkins R., Walker J.D., Branham W., and Sheehan D.M. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts. Environ. Health Perspect. 110 (2002) 29-36
16. HyperChem, rel. 7.03 for Windows, 2002, Autodesk, Inc., Sausalito, CA, USA.
17. Kavlock, R.J., Daston, G.P., DeRosa, C., Fenner-Crisp, P., Gray, L.E., Kaattari, S., Lucier, G., Luster, M., Mac, M.J., Maczka, C., Miller, R., Moore, J., Rolland, R., Scott, G., Sheehan, D.M., Sinks, T., Tilson, H.A., 1996. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 104, 715--740.
18. Lill M.A., Vedani A., and Dobler M. Raptor: combining dual-shell representation, induced-fit simulation, and hydrophobicity scoring in receptor modeling: application toward the simulation of structurally diverse ligand sets. J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 6174-6186
19. Liu H.X., Papa E., and Gramatica P. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006) 1540-1548
20. Liu H.X., Papa E., and Gramatica P. In silico Screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 26 (2007) 135-144
21. Netzeva T., Dearden J., Edwards R., Worgan A.D.P., and Cronin M.T.D. QSAR analysis of the toxicity of aromatic compounds to Chlorella vulgaris in a novel short term assay. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004) 258-265
22. Nishihara T., Nishikawa J., Kanayama T., Dakeyama F., Saito K., Imagawa M., Takatori S., Kitagawa Y., Hori S., and Utsumi H. Estrogenic activities of 517 chemicals by yeast two-hybrid assay. J. Health Sci. 46 (2000) 282-298
23. Papa E., Villa F., and Gramatica P. Statistically validated QSARs and theoretical descriptors for the modelling of the aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (Fathead Minnow). J. Chem. Inf. Model 45 (2005) 1256-1266
24. Papa E., Battaini F., and Gramatica P. Ranking of aquatic toxicity of esters modelled by QSAR. Chemosphere 58 (2005) 559-570
25. SCAN - Software for Chemometric Analysis, rel. 1.1 for Windows, 1995, Minitab (USA).
26. Shi L., Fang H., Tong W., Wu J., Perkins R., Blair R.M., Branham W.S., Dial S.L., Moland C.L., and Sheehan D.M. QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001) 186-195
27. Todeschini R., and Gramatica P. 3D-modelling and prediction by WHIM descriptors. Part 5. Theory development and chemical meaning of the WHIM descriptors. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 16 (1997) 113-119
28. Todeschini, R., 2004. MOBY DIGS-software for multilinear regression analysis and variable subset selection by genetic algorithm, rel. version 1.0 beta for Windows, Talete srl, Milan, Italy.
29. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., Mauri, A., Pavan, M., 2006. DRAGON-Software for the calculation of molecular descriptors. Ver. 5.4 for Windows.
30. Tong W., Welsh W.J., Shi L., Fang H., and Perkins R. Structure-activity relationship approaches and applications. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 (2003) 1680-1695
31. Tropsha A., Gramatica P., and Gombar V.K. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003) 69-76
32. Vighi M., Gramatica P., Consolaro F., and Todeschini R. QSAR and chemometric approaches for setting water quality objectives for dangerous chemicals. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 49 (2001) 206-220
33. Waller C.L., Oprea T.I., Chae K., Park H.-K., Korach K.S., Laws S.C., Wiese T.E., Kelce W.R., and Gray Jr. L.E. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9 (1996) 1240-1248