Do shark declines create fear-released systems?

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 191-201

  Frid, Alejandro ^a,b   Baker, Gregory G ^a   Dill, Lawrence M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b RR1 I27 ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CLUPEOID; DIETARY SHIFT; GADOID; MODELING; MORTALITY; PINNIPED; POPULATION DECLINE; PREDATION RISK; SHARK; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TROPHIC CASCADE;

CHONDRICHTHYES; CLUPEA PALLASI; CLUPEIDAE; POLLACHIUS; SOMNIOSUS PACIFICUS; THERAGRA CHALCOGRAMMA;

EID: 38649098130     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16134.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities Am. Nat. 146 : 112 134.
2. Alonzo, S. H. et al. 2003. Ecological games in space and time: the distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill and penguins Ecology 84 : 1598 1607.
3. Anholt, B. R. Werner, E. E. 1995. Interactions between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior Ecology 76 : 2230 2234.
4. Baum, J. K. et al. 2003. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic Science 299 : 389 392.
5. Berger, J. et al. 2001. A mammalian predator-prey imbalance: grizzly bears and wolf extinction affect avian neotropical migrants. Ecol. Appl. 11 : 947 960.
6. Bowen, W. D. et al. 2001. Foraging effort, food intake, and lactation performance depend on maternal mass in a small phocid seal. Funct. Ecol. 15 : 325 332.
7. Brown, J. S. Kotler, B. P. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol. Lett. 7 : 999 1014.
8. Byrnes, J. et al. 2006. Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 9 : 61 71.
9. Clark, C. W. 1994. Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle. Behav. Ecol. 5 : 159 170.
10. Clark, C. W. Mangel, M. 2000. Dynamic state variable models in ecology. Oxford Univ. Press.
11. Clarke, S. C. et al. 2006. Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. Ecol. Lett. 9 : 1115 1126.
12. Davis, R. W. et al. 1985. Swimming metabolism of yearling and adult harbor seals Phoca vitulina Physiol. Zool. 58 : 590 596.
13. Fortin, D. et al. 2005. Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park Ecology 86 : 1320 1330.
14. Frid, A. et al. 2006. Do resource declines increase predation rates on North Pacific harbor seals? A behavior-based plausibility model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 312 : 265 275.
15. Frid, A. et al. 2007a. Inferring prey perception of relative danger in large-scale marine systems. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9 : 635 649.
16. Frid, A., Heithaus, M. Dill, L. 2007b. Dangerous dive cycles and the proverbial ostrich Oikos 116 : 893 902.
17. Heithaus, M. R. 2001. Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation Oikos 92 : 542 554.
18. Heithaus, M. R. Dill, L. M. 2002. Food availability and predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use Ecology 83 : 480 491.
19. Heithaus, M. R. Frid, A. 2003. Optimal diving under the risk of predation. J. Theor. Biol. 223 : 79 92.
20. Heithaus, M. R. Dill, L. M. 2006. Does tiger shark risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales? Oikos 114 : 257 264.
21. Heithaus, M. R. et al. 2007. State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem J. Anim. Ecol. 76 : 837 844.
22. Hilborn, R. Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton Univ. Press.
23. Hulbert, L. et al. 2006. Depth and movement behaviour of the Pacific sleeper shark in the northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Fish Biol. 69 : 406 425.
24. Iverson, S. J. et al. 1997. Fatty acid signatures reveal fine scale structure of foraging distribution of harbor seals and their prey in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 151 : 255 271.
25. Johannes, R. E. 1998. The case for data-less marine resource management: examples from tropical nearshore finfisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13 : 243 246.
26. Johnson, C. et al. 2007. Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274 : 341 346.
27. Kitchell, J. F. et al. 2002. The role of sharks and longline fisheries in a pelagic ecosystem of the central Pacific Ecosystems 5 : 202 216.
28. Kramer, D. L. 1988. The behavioral ecology of air breathing by aquatic animals. Can. J. Zool. 66 : 89 94.
29. Lima, S. L. Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation. Can. J. Zool. 68 : 619 640.
30. Luttbeg, B. et al. 2003. Prey state and experimental design affect relative size of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects Ecology 84 : 1140 1150.
31. Matkin, C. O. et al. 2003. Photographic and acoustic monitoring of killer whales in Prince William Sound and Kenai Fjords - Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Restoration Project 030012 Final Rep.
32. McNamara, J. M. Houston, A. I. 1987. Starvation and predation as factors limiting population size Ecology 68 : 1515 1519.
33. Mitchell, W. A. Lima, S. L. 2002. Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey Oikos 99 : 249 259.
34. Myers, R. A. et al. 2007. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean Science 315 : 1846 1850.
35. Paul, A. J. et al. 1998. Fall and spring somatic energy content for Alaskan Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi Valenciennes 1847) relative to age, size and sex. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 223 : 133 142.
36. Rosen, D. A. S. et al. 2000. Effect of ration size and meal frequency on assimilation and digestive efficiency in yearling Steller sea lions, Eumetopias jubatus Aquat. Mamm. 26.1 : 76 82.
37. Saulitis, E. et al. 2000. Foraging strategies of sympatric killer whale (Orcinus orca) populations in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 16 : 94 109.
38. Scheffer, M. et al. 2005. Cascading effects of overfishing marine systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 579 581.
39. Schmidt, K. 2006. Non-additivity among multiple cues of predation risk: a behaviorally-driven trophic cascade between owls and songbirds Oikos 113 : 82 90.
40. Schmitz, O. 2003. Top predator control of plant biodiversity and productivity in an old-field ecosystem. Ecol. Lett. 6 : 156 163.
41. Schmitz, O. J. et al. 2004. Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol. Lett. 7 : 153 163.
42. Shepherd, T. Myers, R. A. 2005. Direct and indirect fishery effects on small coastal elasmobranchs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecol. Lett. 8 : 1095 1104.
43. Sigler, M. F. et al. 2006. Diet of Pacific sleeper shark, a potential Steller sea lion predator, in the northeast Pacific Ocean. J. Fish Biol. 69 : 392 405.
44. Sinclair, A. R. E. Arcese, P. 1995. Population consequences of predation-sensitive foraging: the Serengeti wildebeest Ecology 76 : 882 891.
45. Thomas, G. L. Thorne, R. E. 2001. Night -time predation by Steller sea lions Nature 411 : 1013.
46. Thomas, G. L. Thorne, R. E. 2003. Acoustical-optical assessment of Pacific herring and their predator assemblage in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Aquat. Living Resour. 6 : 247 253.
47. Thorne, R. E. 2004. Biological monitoring of herring and pollock in Prince William Sound. - Annu. Prog. Rep. Oil Spill Recovery Inst., Contract no. 03-10-23, Prince William Sound Science Center.
48. Trumble, S. J. et al. 2003. Digestive constraints on an aquatic carnivore: effects of feeding frequency and prey consumption on harbor seals. J. Comp. Physiol. B 173 : 501 509.
49. Vollenweider, J. J. 2004. Variability in Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) prey quality in southeastern Alaska. Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks.
50. Walters, C. J. et al. 2000. Representing density dependent consequences of life history strategies in aquatic ecosystems: ECOSIM II Ecosystems 3 : 70 83.
51. Werner, E. E. Peacor, S. D. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities Ecology 84 : 1083 1100.
52. Williams, T. M. et al. 2000. Sink or swim: strategies for cost-efficient diving by marine mammals Science 288 : 133 136.
53. Wirsing, A. J. et al. 2007a. Living on the edge: dugongs prefer to forage in microhabitats that allow escape from rather than avoidance of predators. Anim. Behav. 74 : 93 101.
54. Wirsing, A. J. et al. 2007b. Can you dig it? Use of excavation, a risky foraging tactic, by dugongs is sensitive to predation danger. - Anim. Behav. In press.