Age-related differences in the visual processes implied in perception and action: Distance and location parameters

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 107-124

  Rival, Christina ^a,c   Olivier, Isabelle ^a   Ceyte, Hadrien ^a   Bard, Chantal ^b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Development; Duncker illusion; Pointing task; Visual pathways

Indexed keywords

AGING; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

AGING; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0742306714     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams R.A. Landgraf J.Z. Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization Perception & Psychophysics 47 1990 349-359
2. Aglioti S. DeSouza J.F.X. Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand Current Biology 5 1995 679-685
3. Bard C. Hay L. Timing and accuracy of visually directed movement in children: Control of direction and amplitude components Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50 1990 102-118
4. Bayer C.A. An explanation of developmental differences in the successive trials effect of the Poggendorff illusion Psychological Science 26 1972 85-86
5. Bridgeman B. Lewis S. Heit G. Nagle M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 1979 692-700
6. Bridgeman B. Peery S. Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space Perception & Psychophysics 59 1997 456-469
7. Brown J.V. Sepehr M.M. Ettlinger G. Skreczek W. The accuracy of aimed movement to visual targets during development: The role of visual information Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41 1986 443-460
8. Chieffi S. Allport D.A. Independent coding of target distance and direction in visuo-spatial working memory Psychological Research 60 1997 244-250
9. Corlett J.T. Dickinson J. The effect of distance and location cues on linear arm positioning by children Journal of Psychology 113 1983 47-51
10. Donkelaar P.V. Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions Experimental Brain Research 125 1999 517-520
11. Franz V.H. Gegenfurtner K.R. Bülthoff H.H. Fahle M. Grasping visual illusion: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action Psychological Science 11 2000 20-25
12. Gentilucci M. Benuzzi F. Bertolani L. Gangitano M. Visual illusions and the control of children arm movements Neuropsychologia 39 2001 132-139
13. Gentilucci M. Chieffi S. Daprati E. Saetti M.C. Toni I. Visual illusion and action Neuropsychologia 34 1996 369-376
14. Goodale M.A. Jakobson L.S. Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements Neuropsychologia 32 1994 1159-1178
15. Haffenden A.M. Goodale M.A. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1998 122-136
16. Haffenden A.M. Goodale M.A. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Non illusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp Current Biology 11 2001 177-181
17. Hanisch C. Konczak J. Dohle C. The effect of Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children Experimental Brain Research 137 2001 237-245
18. Hatze H. The use of optimally regularized Fourier series for estimating higher-order derivatives of noisy biomechanical data Journal of Biomechanics 14 1981 13-18
19. Hay L. Developmental changes in eye-hand coordination behaviours: Programming versus feedback control In Bard C. Fleury M. Hay L. (Eds.), Development of eye-hand coordination across the life span 1990 217-244 Univ. of South Carolina Press Columbia, SC
20. Kuhtz-Buschbeck J.P. Stolze H. Johnk K. Boczek-Funcke A. Illert M. Development of prehension movements in children: A kinematic study Experimental Brain Research 122 1998 424-432
21. Mack A. Heur F. Frendrich R. Villardi K. Chambers D. Induced motion and oculomotor capture Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 1985 329-345
22. Milner A.D. Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995 Oxford Univ. Press New York
23. Paré M. Dugas C. Developmental changes in prehension during childhood Experimental Brain Research 125 1999 239-247
24. Pavani F. Boscabli I. Benvenutti F. Rabuffetti M. Farnè A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research 127 1999 95-101
25. Piaget J. Les mécanismes perceptifs 1961 Presses Universitaires de France Paris
26. Porac C. Coren S. Life-span age trends in the perception of the Müller-Lyer: Additional evidence for the existence of two illusions Canadian Journal of Psychology 35 1981 58-62
27. Predebon J. Age trends in the Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions British Journal of Developmental Psychology 3 1985 99-103
28. Servos P. Carnahan H. Fedwick J. The visuomotor system resists the horizontal-vertical illusion Journal of Motor Behavior 32 2000 400-404
29. Von Hofsten C. Predictive reaching for moving objects by human infants Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30 1980 369-382
30. Von Hofsten C. Rosander K. The development of smooth pursuit tracking in young infants Vision Research 37 1997 1799-1810
31. Walters A. A genetic study of geometrical-optical illusions Genetic Monographs 25 1942 101-255
32. Wapner S. Werner H. Perceptual development: An investigation within the framework of sensory-tonic field 1957 Clark Univ. Press Worcester, MA
33. Weintraub D.J. Ebbinghaus illusion: Context, contour and age influence the judged size of a circle admist circles Journal of Experimental Psychology 5 1979 353-364
34. Zanuttini L. Figural and semantic factors in change in the Ebbinghaus illusion across four age groups of children Perceptual and Motor Skills 82 1996 15-19