Conceptual combination with PUNC

Artificial Intelligence Review

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 353-374

  Lynott, Dermot ^a   Tagalakis, Georgios ^a   Keane, Mark T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Conceptual combination; Diagnosticity; Familiarity; Informativeness; Noun noun compounds; Plausibility

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS;

CONCEPTUAL COMBINATION; DIAGNOSTICITY; INFORMATIVENESS; NOUN-NOUN COMPOUNDS; PLAUSIBILITY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 3843069774     PISSN: 02692821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:AIRE.0000036263.74312.50     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Blum, A. & Langley, P. (1997). Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning. Artificial Intelligence 97: 245-271.
2. Bock, J. B. and Clifton, C. Jr. (2000). The Role of Salience in Conceptual Combination. Memory and Cognition 28: 1378-1386.
3. Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to Coin Agent and Instrument Nouns. Cognition 12: 1-24.
4. Cohen, B. & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of Concepts. Cognitive Science 8: 27-58.
5. Costello, F. J. (2002). Investigating Creative Language: People's Choice of Words in the Production of Noun-Noun Compounds. In Gray, W. D. & Schunn, C. D. (eds.) Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 232-237. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Costello, F. J. & Keane, M. T. (1997). Polysemy in Conceptual Combination: Testing the Constraint Theory of Combination. In Shafto, M. G. & Langley, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 137-142. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Costello, F. J. & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient Creativity: Constraint-Guided Conceptual Combination. Cognitive Science 24: 299-349.
8. Costello, F. J. & Keane, M. T. (2001). Testing Two Theories of Conceptual Combination: Alignment versus Diagnosticity in the Comprehension and Production of Combined Concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 255-271.
9. Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Estes, Z. & Glucksberg, S. (2000). Interactive Property Attribution in Concept Combination. Memory and Cognition 28: 28-34.
11. Forbus, K. D., Ferguson, R. W. & Gentner, D. (1994). Incremental Structure Mapping. In Ram, A. & Eiselt, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 313-318. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Franks, B. (1995). Sense Generation; A 'Quasi-Classical' Approach to Concepts and Concepts Combination. Cognitive Science 19: 441-505.
13. Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-Based Combinations Versus Property-Based Combinations: A Test of the CARIN Theory and Dual-Process Theory of Conceptual Combination. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 365-389.
14. Gagné, C. L. & Shoben, E. J. (1997). Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier-Noun Combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 71-87.
15. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Giora, R. (1999). On the Priority of Salient Meanings: Studies of Literal and Figurative Language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919-929.
17. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
18. Keane, M. & Costello, F. (2001). Setting Limits on Analogy: Why Conceptual Combination is not Structural Alignment. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J. & Kokinov, B. (eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, 287-312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T. & Duff, S. R. S. (1994). Constraints on Analogical Mapping: A Comparison of Three Models. Cognitive Science 18: 387-438.
20. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An Exemplar-based Connectionist Model of Category Learning. Psychological Review 99: 1922-1944.
21. Lin, D. (1998). An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In Shavlik, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 296-304. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
22. Markman, A. B. & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25: 431-467.
23. McRae, K. & Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic Semantic Similarity Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24: 558-572.
24. Miller, G. A. (1994). Nouns in WordNet: A Lexical Inheritance System. International Journal of Lexicography 3: 245-264.
25. Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending Complex Concepts. Cognitive Science 12: 529-562.
26. Resnik, P. (1998). Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Bases Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11: 95-130.
27. Rosch, E. (1975). Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605.
28. Shoben, E. J. (1993). Non-Predicating Conceptual Combinations. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 29: 391-409.
29. Shoben, E. J. & Gagné, C. L. (1997). Thematic Relations and the Creation of Combined Concepts. In Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. & Vaid, J. (eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes, 31-50. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C. & Ahn, W. -K. (1998). Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence. Cognitive Science 22: 189-228.
31. Tagalakis, G. & Keane, M. T. (2003). Modelling the Understanding of Noun-Noun Compounds: The Role of Familiarity. In Schmalhofer, F., Young, R. M. & Katz, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference 2003, 319-324. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of Semantic and Associative Relatedness on Automatic Priming. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 440-458.
33. Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and Similarity in Conceptual Combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 434-453.
34. Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When Concepts Combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4: 167-183.
35. Wisniewski, E. J. & Love, B. C. (1998). Relations versus Properties in Conceptual Combination. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 177-202.