Centered but not caught in the middle: Stepchildren's perceptions of dialectical contradictions in the communication of co-parents

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-55

  Braithwaite, Dawn O ^a   Toller, Paige W ^a,b   Daas, Karen L ^a,c   Durham, Wesley T ^a,d   Jones, Adam C ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA   (United States)

^e MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Relational Dialectics; Stepchildren; Stepfamilies

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349146535     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880701799337     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Afifi, T. D. (2003). "Feeling caught" in stepfamilies: Managing boundary turbulence through appropriate privacy coordination rules. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 729-756.
2. Afifi, T., & McManus, T. (2006). Investigating privacy boundaries: Communication in post-divorce families. In K. Floyd & M. T. Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 171-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Afifi, T. D., & Schrodt, P. (2003). "Feeling caught" as a mediator of adolescents' and young adults' avoidance and satisfaction with their parents in divorced and non-divorced households. Communication Monographs, 70, 142-173.
4. Ahrons, C. R. (1981). The continuing co-parental relationship between divorced spouses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 413-429.
5. Amato, P. R. (1994). The implications of research findings on children in stepfamilies. In A. Booth & J. Dunn (Eds.), Stepfamilies: Who benefits? Who does not? (pp. 81-87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Baxter, L. A. (2004). Distinguished scholar article: Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1-22.
7. Baxter, L. A. (2006). Relational dialectics theory: Multivocal dialogues of family communication. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 130-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Baxter, L. A. (in press). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Baxter, L. A., & Babbie, E. R. (2004). The basics of communication research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10. Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2008). Relational dialectics theory: Discursive things that go bump in the night. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 349-361). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Bryant, L. (2006). Types of communication triads perceived by young-adult stepchildren in established stepfamilies. Communication Studies, 57, 381-400.
12. Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., Bryant, L., & Wagner, A. (2004). Stepchildren's perceptions of the contradictions in communication with stepparents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 447-467.
13. Baxter, L. A., Braithwaite, D. O., & Nicholson, J. (1999). Turning points in the development of blended family relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 291-313.
14. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
15. Blow, K., & Daniel, G. (2002). Frozen narratives? Post-divorce processes and contact disputes. Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 85-103.
16. Bochner, A. P. (1985). Perspectives on inquiry: Representation, conversation, and reflection. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 27-58). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Braithwaite, D. O., & Baxter, L. A. (2006). You're my parent but you're not": Dialectical tensions in stepchildren's perceptions about communicating with the nonresidential parent. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 30-48.
18. Braithwaite, D. O., Baxter, L. A., & Harper, A. (1998). The role of rituals in the management of dialectical tension of "old" and "new" in blended families. Communication Studies, 48, 101-120.
19. Braithwaite, D. O., McBride, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2003). Parent teams and the everyday interactions of co-parenting children in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 16, 93-111.
20. Braithwaite, D. O., Olson, L., Golish, T., Soukup, C., & Turman, P. (2001). "Becoming a family": Developmental processes represented in blended family discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 221-247.
21. Braithwaite, D. O., Schrodt, P., & Baxter, L. A. (2006). Communication in stepfamily relationships: Understudied and misunderstood. In K. Floyd & M. T. Morman (Eds.), Widening the family circle: New research on family communication (pp. 153-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Burrell, N. A. (1995). Communication patterns in stepfamilies: Redefining family roles, themes, and conflict styles. In M. Fitzpatrick & A. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 290-309). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Buzzanell, P. M., & Burrell, N. A. (1997). Family and workplace conflict: Examining metaphorical conflict schemas and expressions across context and sex. Human Communication Research, 24, 109-146.
24. Cissna, K. N. (2000). Applied communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 169-173.
25. Cissna, K. N., Cox, D. E., & Bochner, A. P. (1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 57, 44-61.
26. Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288-1307.
27. Coleman, M. A., Fine, M. A., Ganong, L. G., Downs, K. M., & Pauk, N. (2001). When you're not the Brady Bunch: Identifying perceived conflicts and resolution strategies in stepfamilies. Personal Relationships, 8, 55-73.
28. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Dudley, J. R. (1991). Increasing our understanding of divorced fathers who have infrequent contact with their children. Family Relations, 40, 279-285.
31. Dunn, J., & Booth, A. (1994). Stepfamilies: An overview. In A. Booth & J. Dunn (Eds.), Stepfamilies: Who benefits? Who does not? (pp. 217-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Dunn, J., Davies, L. C., O'Connor, T. G., & Sturgess, W. (2001). Family lives and friendships: The perspectives of children in step-, single-parent, and nonstep families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 272-287.
33. Eadie, W. F. (2000). Changing boundaries, changing expectations, changing results. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 174-177.
34. Fine, M. A., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (1998). Consistency in perceptions of the step-parent role among step-parents, parents, and stepchildren. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 811-829.
35. Fine, M. A., Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (1999). A social constructionist multi-method approach to understanding the stepparent role. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Coping with divorce, single-parenthood, and remarriage: A risk and resiliency perspective (pp. 273-294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (1994). Remarried family relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Golish, T. D. (2003). Stepfamily communication strengths: Understanding the ties that bind. Human Communication Research, 29, 41-80.
38. Golish, T. D., & Caughlin, J. (2002). I'd rather not talk about it: Adolescents' and young adults' use of topic avoidance in stepfamilies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 78-106.
39. Hedges, A. (1985). Group interviewing. In R. Walker (Ed.), Applied qualitative research (pp. 71-91). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Malchiodi, C. A. (1998). Understanding children's drawings. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Masheter, C. (1994). Dialogues between ex-spouses: Evidence of dialectic relationship development. In R. Conville (Ed.), Uses of structure in communication studies (pp. 83-101). New York: Praeger.
45. McGoldrick, M., & Carter, E. A. (1989). Forming a remarried family. In E. A. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The family cycle: A framework for family therapy (pp. 399-429). New York: Gardner.
46. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Morgan, D. L. (1992). Designing focus group research. In M. Stewart (Ed.), Tools for primary care research (pp. 177-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
49. Mullett, E. K., & Stolberg, A. (1999). The development of the Co-parenting Behaviors Questionnaire: An instrument for children of divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 31, 115-137.
50. Papemow, P. L. (1993). Becoming a stepfamily: Patterns of development in remarried families. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Rawlins, W K. (1983). Negotiating close friendships: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communication Research, 9, 255-266.
52. Rawlins, W. K. (1989). Metaphorical views of interaction in families of origin and future families. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 17, 52-71.
53. Schrodt, P. (2006). The Stepparent Relationship Index: Development, validation, and associations with stepchildren's perceptions of stepparent communication competence and closeness. Personal Relationships, 13, 167-182.
54. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
55. Stone, G., & McKenry, P. (1998). Nonresidential father involvement: A test of a mid-range theory. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 313-336.
56. Toller, P. W. (2005). Negotiation of dialectical contradictions by parents who have experienced the death of a child. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 46-66.
57. Whitchurch, G. G., & Webb, L. M. (1995). Applied family communication research: Casting a light upon the demon. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 239-247.
58. Whiteside, M. E. (1998). The parental alliance following divorce: An overview. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 3-24.
59. Yerby, J. (1989). A conceptual framework for analyzing family metaphors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 17, 42-51.