Applied communication research in the 21st century

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 169-173

  Cissna, Kenneth N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350085     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880009365563     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Browning, L. D., & Beyer, J. M. (1998), The structuring of shared voluntary standards in the U.S. Semiconductor industry: Communicating to reach agreement. Communication Monographs, 65, 220-243.
2. Cissna, K. N. (1982). Editor's note: What is applied communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 10, i-iii.
3. Cissna, K. N. (Ed.). (1995). Applied communication in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Cissna, K. N., Cox, D. E., & Bochner, A. P. (1990). The dialectic of marital and parental relationships within the stepfamily. Communication Monographs, 57, 44-61.
5. Eadie, W. F. (1982, November). The case for applied communication research. Spectra, 18, pp. 1-2.
6. Eadie, W. F. (1990, November). Being applied: Communication research comes of age [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, pp. 1-6.
7. Eadie, W. F. (1991a). The agenda for applied communication research [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(1 & 2).
8. Eadie, W. F. (1991b). Editor's introduction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 1-2.
9. Eadie, W. F. (1994). On having an agenda. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 81-85.
10. Gordon, R. (1982, October). Practical theory. Spectra, 18, pp. 1-2.
11. Hickson, M. (1973). Applied communications research: A beginning point for social relevance. Journal of Applied Communications Research, 1, 1-5.
12. Hickson, M. (1983). Ethnomethodology: The promise of applied communication research? Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48, 182-195.
13. Miller, G. R., & Sunnafrank, M. J. (1984). Theoretical dimensions of applied communication research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 255-263.
14. O'Hair, D., & Kreps, G. L. (Eds.). (1990). Applied communication theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Petronio, S. (1999). "Translating scholarship into practice": An alternative metaphor. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 87-91.
16. Pettegrew, L. S. The importance of context in applied communication research. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 53, 331-338.
17. Phillips, G. M. (1981, September). Researchers as brethren. Spectra, 17, p. 2.
18. Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). Supportive communication and school outcomes for academically "at risk" and other low income middle school students. Communication Education, 47, 309-325.
19. Souza, T. J. (1999). Communication and alternative school student socialization. Communication Education, 48, 91-108.
20. Sunwolf, & Seibold, D. R. (1998). Jurors' intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication in jury decision making. Communication Monographs, 65, 282-307.
21. Tardy, R. W., & Hale, C. L. (1998). Getting "plugged in": A network analysis of health-information seeking among "stay-at-home moms." Communication Monographs, 65, 336-357.
22. Weitzel, A., & Geist, P. (1998). Parliamentary procedure in a community group: Communication and vigilant decision making. Communication Monographs, 65, 244-259.