Geometric structure and chunking in reproduction of motion sequences

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Agam, Yigal ^a,d   Sekuler, Rober ^b,c  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chunking; Imitation; Serial recall; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 38349128455     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.1.11     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agam, Y., Bullock, D., & Sekuler, R. (2005). Imitating unfamiliar sequences of connected linear motions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 2832-2843.
2. Agam, Y., Galperin, H., Gold, B. J., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Learning to imitate novel motion sequences [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(5):1, 1-17, http://journalofvision.org/7/5/1/, doi:10.1167/7.5.1.
3. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
4. Avons, S. E.,(1998). Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 285-308.
5. Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1980). Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception. Psychological Review, 87, 435-469.
6. Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1981). Cues reduce direction uncertainty and enhance motion detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 119-128.
7. Barenholtz, E., Cohen, E., Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2003). Detection of change in shape: An advantage for concavities. Cognition, 89, 1-9.
8. Bertamini, M. (2001). The importance of being convex: An advantage for convexity when judging position. Perception, 30, 1295-1310.
9. Bex, P. J., Simmers, A. J., & Dakin, S. C. (2001). Snakes and ladders: The role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration. Vision Research, 41, 3775-3782.
10. Bei, P. J., Simmers, A. J., & Dakin, S. C. (2003). Grouping local directional signals into moving contours. Vision Research, 43, 2141-2153.
11. Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., & Saidpour, A. (1989). Parts of visual objects: An experimental test of the minima rule. Perception, 18, 817-826.
12. Brown, J. F., & Voth, A. C. (1937). The path of seen movement as a function of the vector field. American Journal of Psychology, 49, 543-563.
13. Caelli, T. M., & Dodwell, P. C. (1980). On the contours of apparent motion: A new perspective on visual space-time. Biological Cybernetics, 39, 27-35.
14. Crowder, R. G. (1970). The role of one's own voice in immediate memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 157-178.
15. Drewnowski, A. (1980). Attributes and priorities in short-term recall: A new model of memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 208-250.
16. Drewnowski, A., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1980). The role of auditory features in memory span for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 319-332.
17. Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2005). Information along contours and object boundaries. Psychological Review, 112, 243-252.
18. Feldman, J. (2001). Bayesian contour integration. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1171-1182.
19. Gobet, F., Lane, P. C., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C., Jones, G., Oliver, I., et al. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 236-243.
20. Haberlandt, K., Lawrence, H., Krohn, T., Bower, K., & Thomas, J. G. (2005). Pauses and durations exhibit a serial position effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 152-158.
21. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
22. Hoffman, D. D., & Singh, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78.
23. Jancke, D. (2000). Orientation formed by a spot's trajectory: A two-dimensional population approach in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, RC86.
24. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
25. Madigan, S. (1980). The serial position curve in immediate serial recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 335-338.
26. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
27. Olsson, H., & Poom, L. (2005). Visual memory needs categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 8776-8780.
28. Postle, B. R., Idzikowski, C., Sala, S.D., Logie, R. H., & Baddeley, A. D. (2006). The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 100-120.
29. Resnikoff. H. L. (1985). The illusion of reality: Topics in information science. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Richards, W., Davhon, B., & Whittington, D. (1986). Encoding contour shape by curvature extrema. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 3, 1483-1491.
31. Schwan, S., & Garsoffky, B. (in press). Understanding events: From perception to action. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action. Oxford University Press.
32. Sekuler, A. B., Sekuler, R., & Sekuler, E. B. (1990). How the visual system detects changes in the direction of moving targets. Perception, 19, 181-195.
33. Sekuler, R., Siddiqui, A., Goyal, N., & Rajan, R. (2003). Reproduction of seen actions: Stimulus-selective learning. Perception, 32, 839-854.
34. Shannon, C. (1948), A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
35. Shipley, T., & Maguire, M. (in press). Geometric information for event segmentation. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks. (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action. Oxford University Press.
36. Shipley, T. F., Maguire, M. J., & Brumberg, J. (2004). Segmentation of event paths [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8):562, 562a, http://jornalofvision.org/4/8/562/, doi:10.1167/4.8.562.
37. Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751-54.
38. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274.
39. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 603-623.
40. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
41. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92-114.
42. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.