The effect of context on Semantic similarity measurement

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4806 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 1274-1284

  Keßler, Carsten ^a   Raubal, Martin ^b   Janowicz, Krzysztof ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; CONTEXT SENSITIVE GRAMMARS; LOGIC PROGRAMMING; WEB SERVICES;

ONTOLOGY SPECIFYING GEOSPATIAL FEATURES; SIM-DL THEORY;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 38349054466     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76890-6_55     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Gärdenfors, P.: How to make the semantic web more semantic. In: Varzi, A.C., Vieu, L. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), pp. 17-34. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)
2. Medin, D., Goldstone, R., Gentner, D.: Respects for similarity. Psychological Review 100(2), 254-278 (1993)
3. Rodriguez, A., Egenhofer, M.: Comparing geospatial entity classes: an asymmetric and context-dependent similarity measure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(3), 229-256 (2004)
4. Albertoni, R., Martino, M.D.: Semantic similarity of ontology instances tailored on the application context. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 1020-1038. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
5. Janowicz, K.: SIM-DL: Towards a semantic similarity measurement theory for the description logic ACCNR, in geographic information retrieval. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1681-1692. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
6. Goldstone, R., Son, J.: Similarity. In: Holyoak, K., Morrison, R. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 13-36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
7. Donnelly, M., Bittner, T.: Spatial relations between classes of individuals. In: Cohn, A., Mark, D. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 182-199. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
8. Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman, N. (ed.) Problems and projects, pp. 437-447. Bobbs-Merrill, New York (1972)
9. Keßler, C.: Similarity measurement in context. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D., Roth-Berghofer, T., Vieu, L. (eds.) Sixth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4635, pp. 277-290. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
10. Rissland, E.: Ai and similarity. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 39-49 (2006)
11. Stroulia, E., Wang, Y.: Structural and semantic matching for assessing web-service similarity. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14, 407-437
12. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84(4), 327-352 (1977)
13. Raubal, M.: Formalizing conceptual spaces. In: Varzi, A., Vieu, L. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 114, pp. 153-164. IOS Press, Amsterdam, NL (2004)
14. Schwering, A., Raubal, M.: Spatial relations for semantic similarity measurement. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 259-269. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces - The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
16. d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A dissimilarity measure for .4CC concept descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Dijon, France, pp. 1695-1699 (2006)
17. Borgida, A., Walsh, T., Hirsh, H.: Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2005), EUR, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, vol. 147 (2005)
18. Janowicz, K.: Similarity-based retrieval for geospatial semantic web services specified using the web service modeling language (wsml-core). In: Scharl, A., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) The Geospatial Web - How Geo-Browsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 are Shaping the Network Society, pp. 235-246. Springer, London (2007)
19. Janowicz, K., Keß 1er, C., Schwarz, M., Wilkes, M., Panov Espeter, M., Bäumer, B.: Algorithm, implementation and application of the sim-dl similarity server. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez-Tatsets, A. (eds.) Second International Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics (GeoS 2007), Mexico City, Mexico, Springer (forthcoming, 2007)
20. Lutz, M., Klien, E.: Ontology-based retrieval of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20(3), 233-260 (2006)
21. Bechhofer, S.: The dig description logic interface: Dig/1.1. In: DL2003 Workshop, Rome (2003)
22. Horrocks, I.: Implementation and optimization techniques. In: Baader, F. (ed.) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications, pp. 306-346. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)
23. Bazire, M., Brézillon, P.: Understanding context before using it. In: Dey, A.K., Kokinov, B., Leake, D.B., Turner, R. (eds.) CONTEXT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3554, pp. 29-40. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)