A dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1695-1699

  D'Amato, Claudia ^a   Fanizzi, Nicola ^a   Esposito, Floriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Description logics; Distances; Similarity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

DESCRIPTION LOGICS; ONTOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; STANDARD REPRESENTATIONS;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 33751051776     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1141277.1141677     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. BAADER, F., CALVANESE, D., MCGUINNESS, D., NARDI, D., AND PATEL-SCHNEIDER, P., Eds. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. BACCHUS, F. Lp, a logic for representing and reasoning with statistical knowledge. Computational Intelligence 6 (1990), 209-231.
3. BOCK., H. Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
4. BORGIDA, A., WALSH, T., AND HIRSH, H. Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In Working Notes of the International Description Logics Workshop (Edinburgh, UK, 2005), CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
5. BRIGHT, M. W., HURSON, A. R., AND PAKZAD, S. H. Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases. ACM Transaction on Database Systems 19, 2 (1994), 212-253.
6. COHEN, W., AND HIRSH, H. Learning the CLASSIC description logic. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1994), P. Torasso, J. Doyle, and E. Sandewall, Eds., Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 121-133.
7. D'AMATO, C., FANIZZI, N., AND ESPOSITO, F. A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale (CILC05) (Rome, Italy, 2005), A. Pettorossi, Ed.
8. DONINI, F. M., LENZERINI, M., NARDI, D., AND SCHAERF, A. Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. Journal of Logic and Computation 4, 4 (1994), 423-452.
9. MANTAY, T. Commonality-based ABox retrieval. Tech. Rep. FBI-HH-M-291/2000, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Hamburg, Germany, 2000.
10. RESNIK, P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 (1999), 95-130.
11. RODRIGUEZ, A. Assessing semantic similarity between spatial entity classes. PhD thesis, University of Maine, 1997.
12. RODRÍGUEZ, M., AND EGENHOFER, M. Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 2 (2003), 442-456.
13. SCHMIDT-SCHAUSS, M., AND SMOLKA, G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence 48, 1 (1991), 1-26.
14. SHVAIKO, P., AND EUZENAT, J. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics IV (2005), 146-171.
15. TVERSKY, A. Features od similarity. Psycological Review 84, 4 (1997), 327-352.
16. WEINSTEIN, P., AND BIMINGHAM, P. Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. In Proceedings of 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, and Management (1999).