Spatial relations for semantic similarity measurement

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3770 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 259-269

  Schwering, Angela ^a,b   Raubal, Martin ^b  

^a ORDNANCE SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE MEASUREMENT; GEOMETRY; INTEGRATION; INTEROPERABILITY; TOPOLOGY; VECTORS;

GEOSPATIAL CONCEPTS; SEMANTIC DISTANCES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SPACES-SETS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 33646745611     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11568346_28     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Gärdenfors, P., Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. 2000, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 317.
2. Lakoff, G., Cognitive Semantics, in Meaning and Mental Representations (Advances in Semiotics), U. Eco, M. Santambrogio, and P. Violi, Editors. 1988, Indiana University Press: Bloomington, Indianapolis, USA. p. 119-154.
3. Egenhofer, M.J. and R.D. Franzosa, Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1991. 5(2): p. 161-174.
4. Hernández, D., Relative Representation of Spatial Knowledge: The 2-C Case, in Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, D.M. Mark and A.U. Frank, Editors. 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 373-385.
5. Freksa, C., Using Information Orientation for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning, in Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, A.U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, Editors. 1992, Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg-New York. p. 162-178.
6. Egenhofer, M.J. and D.M. Mark, Naive Geography, in Spatial Information Theory - A Theoretical Basis for GIS, International Conference COSIT, A.U. Frank and W. Kuhn, Editors. 1995, Springer: Berlin-Heidelberg-New York. p. 1-15.
7. Egenhofer, M.J. and A.R. Shariff, Metric Details for Natural-Language Spatial Relations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1998. 16(4): p. 295-321.
8. Shariff, A.R., M.J. Egenhofer, and D.M. Mark, Natural-Language Spatial Relations Between Linear and Areal Objects: The Topology and Metric of English Language Terms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1998. 12(3): p. 215-246.
9. Suppes, P., et al., Foundations of Measurement - Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations. Vol. 2. 1989, San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press, Inc. 493.
10. Shepard, R.N., The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function. I. Psychometrika, 1962. 27(2): p. 125-140.
11. Nosofsky, R.M., Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 1992. 43: p. 25-53.
12. Krumhansl, C.L., Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data: The Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density. Psychological Review, 1978. 85(5): p. 445-463.
13. Johannesson, M., Modelling Asymmetric Similarity with Prominence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2000. 53: p. 121-139.
14. Tversky, A., Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, 1977. 84(4): p. 327-352.
15. Rodríguez, A. and M. Egenhofer, Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003. 15(2): p. 442-456.
16. Rodríguez, A. and M.J. Egenhofer, Comparing Geospatial Entity Classes: An Asymmetric and Context-Dependent Similarity Measure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2004. 18(3): p. 229-256.
17. Rada, R., et al., Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1989.19(1): p. 17-30.
18. Goldstone, R.L., Similarity, Interactive Activation, and Mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994. 20(1): p. 3-28.
19. Raubal, M., Formalizing Conceptual Spaces, in Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), A. Varzi and L. Vieu, Editors. 2004, IOS Press: Amsterdam, NL. p. 153-164.
20. Bortz, J., Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Vol. 5th. 1999, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
21. Schwering, A. Semantic Neighbourhoods for Spatial Relations (Extended Abstract), in Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience). 2004. Maryland, USA: Regents of the University of California.
22. OrdnanceSurvey, OS MasterMap™ real-world object catalogue. 2001, Ordnance Survey.
23. Malczewski, J., GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. 1999, New York: John Wiley. 392.
24. Johannesson, M., Geometric Models of Similarity. Lund University Cognitive Studies. Vol. 90. 2002, Lund, Sweden: Lund University. 171.
25. Rosch, E., Principles of Categorization, in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. Lloyd, Editors. 1978, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey, p. 27-48.
26. Devore, J. and R. Peck, Statistics - The Exploration and Analysis of Data. 4th ed. 2001, Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury. 713.
27. Goldstone, R.L. and A. Kersten, Concepts and Categorization, in Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, A.F. Healy and R.W. Proctor, Editors. 2003, Wiley: New Jersey, p. 599-621.
28. Schwering, A. and M. Raubal. Measuring Semantic Similarity between Geospatial Conceptual Regions, in 1st International Conference on GeoSpatial Semantics. 2005 forthcoming. Mexico City, Mexico: Springer.