Structural and semantic matching for assessing web-service similarity

International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 407-437

  Stroulia, Eleni ^a   Wang, Yiqiao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Web services; Web service discovery; Web service matching

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944435189     PISSN: 02188430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218843005001213     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. The DARPA Agent Markup Language, http://www.daml.org/.
2. X. Dong, A. Y. Halevy, J. Madhavan, E. Nemes and J. Zhang, Simlarity search for web services, in Proc. VLDB 2004, pp. 372-383.
3. X. Gao, J. Yang and M. P. Papazoglou, The capability matching of web services, in Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Symp. Multimedia Software Engineering, Newport Beach, CA, USA (IEEE Press, 11-13 December 2002), pp. 56-63.
4. R. Mandala, T. Takenobu and T. Hozumi, The use of WordNet in information retrieval, in Proc. COLING/ACL Workshop on Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems, Montreal (1998), pp. 31-37.
5. G. A. Miller, Nouns in WordNet: A lexical inheritance system, Int. J. Lexicography 3(4) (1990) 245-264.
6. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Felbaum, D. Gross and K. Miller, Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database, Int. J. Lexicography 3(4) (1990) 235-244.
7. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
8. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. R. Payne and K. P. Sycara, Semantic matching of web services capabilities, in Proc. First Int. Semantic Web Conference, Sardinia, Italy, 9-12 June (Springer Verlag, 2002), pp. 333-347.
9. S. Ponnekanti and A. Fox, Interoperability among independently evolving web services, in Proc. Middleware 2004, pp. 331-351.
10. J. Purtilo and J. M. Atlee, Module reuse by interface adaptation, Software Practice and Experience 21(6) (1991) 539-556.
11. R. Richardson and A. F. Smeaton, Using WordNet in a knowledge-based approach to information retrieval, Dublin City University School of Computer Applications Working Paper CA-0395.
12. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC- soap12-part0-20030624.
13. G. Salton and C. Buckley, Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval, Information Processing and Management: An Int. J. 24(5) (1988) 513-523.
14. G. Salton, A. Wong and C. S. Yang, A vector-space model for information retrieval, J. American Society for Information Science 18 (ACM Press, November 1975), pp. 13-620.
15. K. Sycara, S. Widoff, M. Klusch and J. Lu, LARKS: dynamic matchmaking among heterogeneous software agents in Cyberspace, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5 (2002) 173-203.
16. UDDI Technical Paper, http://www.uddi.org/pubs/ Iru_UDDI_Technical_White_Paper.pdf.
17. E. Voorhees, Using WordNet for Text Retrieval, in WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database 1998, ed. C. Fellbaum (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999), pp. 285-303.
18. Y. Wang and E. Stroulia, Flexible interface matching for web-service discovery, 4th Int. Conf. Web Information Systems Engineering, Roma, Italy (IEEE Press, 10-12 December 2003), pp. 147-156.
19. Y. Wang and E. Stroulia, Semantic structure matching for assessing web-service similarity, 1st Int. Conf. Service Oriented Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer 2003, 15-18 December 2003), pp. 194-207.
20. WordNet, http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/.
21. Web Services Description Language (WSDL), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
22. A. M. Zaremski and J. M. Wing, Signature matching: A tool for using software libraries, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 4(2) (April 1995) 146-170.
23. A. M. Zaremski and J. M. Wing, Specifications matching of software components, A CM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6(4) (October 1997) 333-369.