Grappling with the literature of education research and practice

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 289-296

  Dolan, Erin L ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; LEARNING; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; STANDARD; TEACHING;

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; LEARNING; LITERATURE; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; TEACHING;

EID: 38349038428     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-09-0087     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Aikenhead, G. S., and Ryan, A. (1992). The development of a new instrument: views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Sci. Educ. 76, 477-491. http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aikenhead/#Articles (accessed 19 September 2007).
2. Anfara, V. A., Jr., Brown, K. M., and Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educ. Res. 31, 28-38.
3. Bodner, G. M., and Orgill, M. (2007). Theoretical Frameworks for Research in Chemistry/Science Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bower, J. M. (1996). Scientists and science education reform: myths, methods, and madness. National Academies of Science Resources for Involving Scientists in Education. http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg2a.htm (accessed 11 May 2007).
5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.) (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. Busch, A., and Tanner, K. D. (2006). Developing scientist educators: analysis of integrating K-12 pedagogy and partnership experiences into graduate science training. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA (April 3-6, 2006).
7. Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Williams, K. S., Allen, D. E., and Tanner, K. D. (2006). On hiring science faculty with education specialties for your science (not education) department. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 5, 297-305.
8. Colburn, A. (2003). The Lingo of Learning: 88 Terms Every Science Teacher Should Know. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Davis, S. H. (2007). Bridging the gap between research and practice: what's good, what's bad, and how can one be sure? Phi Delta Kappa 88, 568-578.
11. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
12. Dolan, E. L., Soots, B. E., Lemaux, P. G., Rhee, S. Y., and Reiser, L. (2004). Strategies for avoiding reinventing the precollege education and outreach wheel. Genetics 166, 1601-1609.
13. Drislane, R., and Parkinson, G. (2007). Online Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Athabasca University. http://bitbucket.icaap.org/ (accessed 28 August 2007).
14. Ercikan, K., and Roth, W.-M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educ. Res. 35, 14-23.
15. Feuer, M., Towne, L., and Shavelson, R. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educ. Res. 31, 4-14.
16. Firestone, W. (1987). Meaning in method: the rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educ. Res. 16, 16-21.
17. Grossman, J., and Mackenzie, F. J. (2005). The randomized controlled trial: gold standard, or merely standard? Perspect. Biol. Med. 48, 516-534.
18. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park, United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
19. Hammond, L., and Brandt, C. (2004). Science and cultural process: defining an anthropological approach to science education. Studies Sci. Educ. 40, 1-47. http://www.csus.edu/indiv/h/hammondl/anthscifinal4-19-04.htm (accessed 19 September 2007).
20. Kearsley, G. (1994-2007). Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database. http://tip.psychology.org/ (accessed 16 June 2007).
21. Kelly, A. E., and Yin, R. K. (2007). Strengthening structured abstracts for education research: the need for claim-based structured abstracts. Educ. Res. 36, 133-138.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
23. McKeown, R. (2003). Working with K-12 schools: insights for scientists. BioScience 53, 870-875.
24. Mosteller, F., Nave, B., and Miech, E. (2004). Why we need a structured abstract in education research. Educ. Res. 33, 29-34.
25. Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for "what works": a response to Slavin. Educ. Res. 33, 24-26.
26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Ravitch, D. (2007). EdSpeak: A Glossary of Education Terms, Phrases, Buzzwords, and Jargon. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28. Schultz, T. (1996). Science education through the eyes of a physicist. National Academies of Science Resources for Involving Scientists in Education. http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg2d.htm (accessed 11 May 2007).
29. Shavelson, R. J., and Towne, L. (eds.) (2002). Scientific Research in Education, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30. Slavin, R. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ. Res. 31, 15-21.
31. Spillane, S. A. (2004). Sharing strengths: educational partnerships that make a difference. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA (April 12-16, 2004).
32. St. Pierre, E. A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: epistemology and ethics. Adult Educ. Q. 56, 239-266.
33. Stephens, T. (2004). The geneticist and the biochemist. University of California Santa Cruz Review, Spring Issue. http://review.ucsc.edu/spring04/ twoversions.html (accessed 25 August 2007).
34. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognit. Sci. 12, 257-285.
35. Tanner, K. D. (2000). Evaluation of scientist-teacher partnerships: benefits to scientist participants. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA (April 30-May 3, 2000).
36. Tanner, K. D., Chatman, L., and Allen, D. (2003). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: science teaching and learning across the school-university divide: cultivating conversations through scientist-teacher partnerships. Cell Biol. Educ. 2, 195-201.
37. Toulmin, S. D. (2003) The Uses of Argument, updated edition, Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York: Cambridge University Press.