Working with K-12 schools: Insights for scientists

BioScience

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 870-875

  McKeown, Rosalyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum development; In service teacher training; K 12 schools; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141793699     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0870:WWKSIF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. [AAAS] American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. (www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.htm)
2. [ASCD] Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 1979. Learning - A Matter of Style, Part I. Alexandria (VA): ASCD. Video-cassette.
3. Blosser PE. 1985. Improving Science Education. Information Bulletin No. 3. Columbus (OH): ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. ERIC Identifier no. ED 266931.
4. Bredderman T. 1983. Effects o f activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A qualitative analysis. Review of Educational Research 53 (Winter): 499-518.
5. Costigan AT. 2002. Teaching the culture of high slakes testing: Listening to new teachers. Action in Teacher Education 23: 28-34.
6. Dunn R, Griggs SA. 1995. Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and counseling adolescents. Westport (CT): Praeger.
7. Ebeling DG. 2000. Adapting your teaching to any learning style. Phi Delta Kappan 82 (November): 247-248.
8. Ebenezer JV, Haggerty SM. 1999. Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Merrill/Prentice Hall.
9. Gabel D. 2003. Enhancing the conceptual understanding of science. Educational Horizons 81 (Winter): 70-76.
10. Guild PB, Garger S. 1985. Marching to Different Drummers. Alexandria (VA): Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Jaeger RM. 1991. Legislative perspectives on statewide testing: Goals, hopes, and desires. Phi Delta Kappan 73 (November): 239-242.
12. Leaver BL. 1997. Teaching the Whole Class. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin Press.
13. Loschert K. 2000. Raising the ante for students, teachers, and schools. In ASCD Infobrief 23. High-Stakes Tests. (21 July 2003; www.ascd.org/cms/objectlib/ascdframeset/index.cfm?publication=http://www.ascd. org/publications/infobrief/issue23.html)
14. [NGS] National Geographic Society. 1994. Geography for Life: National Geography Standards. Geography Education Standards Project. Washington (DC): National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration.
15. [NRC] National Research Council. 1995. National Science Education Standards. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
16. Samples B, Hammond B, McCarthy B. 1985. 4MAT and Science: Toward Wholeness in Science Education. Barrington (IL): Excel.
17. Schulte PL. 1996. A definition of constructivism. Science Scope 20 (November-December): 25-27.
18. Shepard LA. 1991. Will national tests improve student learning? Phi Delta Kappan 73 (November): 232-238.
19. Stake RE. 1991. The teacher, standardized testing, and prospects of revolution. Phi Delta Kappan 73 (November): 243-247.
20. Trowbridge LW, Bybee RW. 1990. Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher. 5th ed. Columbus (OH): Merrill.
21. [USDE] US Department of Education. 2002. Education resource organizations directory. (21 July 2003; http://bcol02.ed.gov/Programs/EROD/org_list_by_territory.cfm)
22. Voke H. 2002. What do we know about sanctions and rewards? In ASCD Infobrief 31. High-Stakes Accountability Strategies. (21 July 2003; www.ascd.org/readingroom/infobrief/issue31.html)
23. Yager RE. 1991. The constructivist learning model. Science Teacher 58 (September): 52-57.