Quantification of renal perfusion and function on a voxel-by-voxel basis: A feasibility study

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 841-849

  Dujardin, M ^a,b   Sourbron, S ^a   Luypaert, R ^a   Verbeelen, D ^a   Stadnik, T ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Deconvolution; Perfusion; Quantification; Renal; T weighted

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; IMPULSE RESPONSE;

ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; DECONVOLUTION ANALYSIS; IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTIONS; PERFUSION; PERFUSION ABNORMALITIES; QUANTIFICATION; RENAL; T-WEIGHTED;

DECONVOLUTION;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; TRACER;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; DISTRIBUTION VOLUME; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY BLOOD FLOW; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY INFARCTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 26844539882     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20608     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hermoye L, Annet L, Lemmerling Ph, Peeters F, Jamar F, Gianello P, Van Huffel S, Van Beers BE. Calculation of the renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate from the renal impulse response obtained with MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1017-1025.
2. Schoenberg S, Aumann S, Just A, Bock M, Knopp M, Johansson L, Ahlstrom H. Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:288-298.
3. Aumann S, Schoenberg S, Just A, Briley-Saebo K, Bjornerud A, Bock M, Brix G. Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (part 1): results in a canine model. Magn Reson Med 2003;49: 276-287.
4. Pedersen M, Morkenborg J, Jensen FT, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H, Djurhuus JC, Frokiaer J. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004; p 879.
5. Dujardin M, Sourbron S, Van Schuerbeek P, Luypaert R, Osteaux M. Deconvolution-based MR imaging of renal perfusion and function using dynamic T1 contrast: a feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004; p 568.
6. Suto Y, Caner BE, Tamagawa Y, Matsuda T, Nakashima T, Matsushita T, Odori T, Ishii Y, Torizuka K. Assessment of magnetic resonance contrast enhancement with GD-DTPA: comparison with the uptake of Tc-99m-DTPA. Radiat Med 1989;7:209-213.
7. Prato FS, Wisenberg G, Marshall TP, Uksik P, Zabel P. Comparison of the biodistribution of gadolinium-153 DTPA and technetium 99m DTPA in rats. J Nucl Med 1988;29:1683-1687.
8. Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Henrik B, Larsson W, Sondergaard L, Ring Poul, Henriksen O. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:225-231.
9. Ivancevic MK, Zimine I, Lazeyras F, Foxall D, Vallee JP. FAST sequences optimization for contrast media pharmacokinetic quantification in tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:771-778.
10. Sourbron S, Luypaert R, Van Schuerbeek P, Dujardin M, Stadnik T, Osteaux M. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularisation parameter. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:209-213.
11. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193: 637-641.
12. Hierholzer K, Fromm M. Funktionen der nieren. In: Schmidt RF, Thews G, editors. Physiologie des Menschen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1997; p 737-776.
13. Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Lee TY. A CT method to measure hemodynamics in brain tumors: validation and application of cerebral blood flow maps. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:462-470.
14. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
15. Sourbron S, Luypaert R, Van Schuerbeek P, Dujardin M, Stadnik T. Choice of the regularization parameter for perfusion quantification with MRI. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:3307-3324.
16. Wu O, Ostergaard L, Benner T, Rosen B, Weisskoff R, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
17. Nazarpoor M. The inflow effect of signal intensity on T1-weighted images using inversion recovery (IR) sequence for measuring perfusion with MRI. MAGMA 2004;16:527.
18. Ivancevic M, Zimine I, Montet X, Hyacinthe J, Lazeyras F, Foxall D, Vallee J. Correction of the inflow effects on fast GRE MR sequence for perfusion imaging. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2003: p 149.
19. Junqueira LC, Carneiro J, Kelley RO. Functionele histologie. Utrecht: Bunge; 1993; 480 p.
20. Silbernagl S, Despopoulos A. Sesam-atlas van de Fysiologie. Baarn: Bosch & Keuning, 1999; 114 p.
21. Wolf GL, Hoop B, Cannillo JA, Rogowska JA, Halpern EF. Measurement of renal transit of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine with echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:365-372.