Renal perfusion: Comparison of saturation-recovery TurboFLASH measurements at 1.5T with saturation-recovery TurboFLASH and time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique (TREAT) at 3.0T

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1413-1419

  Michaely, Henrik J ^a,b   Nael, Kambiz ^b   Schoenberg, Stefan O ^a   Finn, J Paul ^b   Oesingmann, Niels ^c   Lodemann, Klaus Peter ^d   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Ruehm, Stefan G ^b  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^d Bracco Altana Pharma   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Comparison study; Echo sharing; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Renal perfusion; Time resolved angiography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY PERFUSION; MALE; MAXIMAL SIGNAL INTENSITY; MAXIMAL UPSLOPE; MEAN TRANSIT TIME; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNIQUE; TIME RESOLVED ECHO SHARED ANGIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUE; TIME TO PEAK; TURBOFLASH;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL CIRCULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845334218     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20776     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vallee JP, Lazeyras F, Khan HG, Terrier F. Absolute renal blood flow quantification by dynamic MRI and Gd-DTPA. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1245-1252.
2. Montet X, Ivancevic MK, Belenger J, et al. Noninvasive measurement of absolute renal perfusion by contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:584-592.
3. Schoenberg SO, Aumann S, Just A, et al. Quantification of renal perfusion abnormalities using an intravascular contrast agent (part 2): results in animals and humans with renal artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:288-298.
4. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Oesingmann N, et al. Renal artery stenosis: functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements - feasibility study. Radiology 2006;238:586-596.
5. Gandy SJ, Sudarshan TA, Sheppard DG, Allan LC, McLeay TB, Houston JG. Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: a functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:461-466.
6. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351.
7. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, Requardt M, Kauczor HU, Bock M. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005;40:40-48.
8. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
9. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, et al. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetlc MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:531-539.
10. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Modeling of data. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 1992, p 521-529.
11. Thompson HK, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964;14:502-515.
12. Romero JC, Lerman LO. Novel noninvasive techniques for studying renal function in man. Semin Nephrol 2000;20:456-462.
13. Krier JD, Ritman EL, Bajzer Z, Romero JC, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular filtration, and tubular function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2001;281:F630-F638.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170.
15. Schmitt F, Grosu D, Mohr C, et al. 3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths. Radiologe 2004;44:31-47.
16. Van Hoe L, De Jaegere T, Bosmans H, Bogaert J, Oyen R, Marchal G. Time-resolved MR angiography of the upper abdomen: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 1999;9:418-421.
17. Krause UJ, Pabst T, Kostler H, Helbig C, Kenn W, Hahn D. Time-resolved MR angiography of the renal artery: morphology and perfusion. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002;174:1170-1174.
18. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing- independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 1999;211:667-679.
19. Finn JP, Baskaran V, Carr JC, et al. Thorax: low-dose contrastenhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with subsecond temporal resolution - initial results. Radiology 2002;224:896-904.
20. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, Lee P, Raghavan M, Kramer EL. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:289-294.