Experimental validation of perfumery ternary diagram® methodology

AIChE Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 310-320

  Gomes, Paula B ^a   Mata, Vera G ^a   Rodrigues, Alírio E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Fragrance; Headspace analysis; Odor threshold; Odor value; Perfume; Perfumery ternary diagram

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; PHASE DIAGRAMS;

HEADSPACE CONCENTRATIONS; LIQUID COMPOSITION; PERFUME MIXTURE;

TERNARY SYSTEMS;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; TERNARY SYSTEMS;

EID: 38149065910     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11353     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials: Preparation, Properties and Uses. New York: Wiley-VCH, 1997.
2. Calkin RR, Jellinek JS. Perfumery: Practice and Principles. New York: Wiley, 1994.
3. Baydar A, McGee T. Behavior of fragrances on skin. Cosmetics Toiletries Magazine. 1996;111:49-53.
4. Baydar A, McGee T, Purzycky KL. Skin odor value technology for fragrance performance optimization. Perfumer Flavorist. 1995;20:45-53.
5. Neuner-Jehle N, Etzweiler F. The measuring of odors. In: Muller PM, Lamparsky D, editors. Perfumes - Art, Science and Technology. London: Blackie Academic & Professional,1994:153-212.
6. Gygax H, Koch H. The measurement of odours. Chimia. 2001;55:401-405.
7. Stevens SS. On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev. 1957;64:153-181.
8. Sell C. Structure/odor correlations: the mechanism of olfaction and the design of novel fragrance ingredients. Perfumer Flavorist. 2000;25:67-73.
9. Devos M, Rouault J, Laffort P, editors. Standardized Olfactory Power Law Exponents. France: Editions Universitaires de Dijon, 2002.
10. Laffort P, Dravnieks A. Several models of suprathreshold quantitative olfactory interaction in humans applied to binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures. Chem Senses. 1982;7:153-174.
11. Cain WS, Schiet FT, Olsson MJ, deWijk RA. Comparison of models of odor interaction. Chem Senses. 1995;20:625-637.
12. Sell C. Scent through the looking glass. In: Kraft P, Swift KAD, editors. Perspectives in Flavor and Fragrance Research. Zurich: Wiley-VCH,2005:67-88.
13. Distel H, Hudson R. Judgement of odor intensity is influenced by subject's knowledge of the odor source. Chem Senses. 2001;26:247-251.
14. Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martínez-Gómez M, Schicker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R. Perception of everyday odors -correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses. 1999;24:191-199.
15. ASTM International.E544: standard recommended practices for referencing suprathreshold odor intensity. 1999, USA.
16. Smythe J, Lawless HT. Book review - standardized olfactory power law exponents. J Sensory Studies. 2003;18:177-179.
17. Schudel P. Odour, a fascinating phenomenon. Pure Appl Chem. 1990;62:1381-1383.
18. Mata VG, Gomes PB, Rodrigues AE. Perfumery ternary diagrams (PTD): a new concept applied to the optimization of perfume compositions. Flavour Fragrance J 2005;20:465-471.
19. Mata VG, Gomes PB, Rodrigues AE. Engineering perfumes. AIChE J 2005;51:2834-2852.
20. Mata VG, Gomes PB, Rodrigues AE. Effect of non-idealities in perfume mixtures using the perfumery ternary diagrams (PTD) concept. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:4435-4441.
21. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O'Connell JP. The Properties of Gases and Liquids. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
22. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM, Poling BE. The Properties of Gases and Liquids. New York: McGraw Hill, 1987.
23. Mata VG, Rodrigues AE. A new methodology for the definition of odor zones in perfumery ternary diagrams. AIChE J. 2006;52:2938-2948.
24. Appell L. Odorimetric methods. Am Perfume Cosmetics. 1969;84:41-46.
25. Behan JM, Perring KD. Perfume interactions with sodium dodecyl sulphate solutions. Int J Cosmetic Sci. 1987;9:261-268.
26. Dyson GM. The scientific basis of odour. Chem Ind. 1938;57:647-651.
27. Amoore AE. Molecular Basis of Odour. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1970.
28. Polak EH. Mutiple profile-multiple receptor site model for vertebrate olfaction. J Theor Biol. 1973;40:469-484.
29. Wright RH. Odor and molecular vibration: neural coding for olfactory information. J Theor Biol. 1977;64:473-502.
30. Buck L, Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell. 1991;65:171-187.
31. Turin L. A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory reception. Chem Senses. 1996;21:773-791.
32. Malnic B, Hirono J, Sato T, Buck LB. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell. 1999;96:713-723.
33. Van Gemert LJ, editor. Compilations of Odour Threshold Values in Air and Water. Netherlands: BACIS, 1999.
34. Leffingwell & Associates, www.leffingwell.com. 2004.
35. Zehentbauer GN, Eddy CL, Rodriguez PA, Pelfrey CS, Li J. Head-space sampling: a critical part in evaluating true gas phase concentrations. In: Deibler KD, Delwiche J, editors. Handbook of Flavor Characterization. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, 2004:285-294.
36. Weston CA, Albert RP, Speis DN, Williams L, Martin W. Screening environmental samples for volatile organics utilizing a static head-space sampler. Am Lab. 1992;24:30.
37. McNally ME, Grob RL. A review: current applications of static headspace and dynamic headspace analysis. Am Lab. 1985;17:20.
38. VDI3881. Olfactometry: Odour Threshold Determination. German Standard VDI 3881: Germany, 1980.
39. EN13725. Air Quality - Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry. European Standard EN 13725: European Community, 2003.
40. AWMA-EE-6.Guidelines for odor sampling and measurement by dynamic dilution olfactometry - draft. In: Sot So O, editor. Measurement. 2002, AWMA EE-6 EE-6 Odor Committee: United States of America.
41. ASTM-E679-91.Standard practices for determination of odor and taste thresholds by a forced-choice ascending concentration series method of limits. American Standard ASTM E679-91: Philadelphia, United States of America, 1991.
42. Constantinescu D, Wittig R, Gmehling J. Azeotropic and heats of mixing data for various binary systems with diethoxymethane. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2001;191:99-109.
43. Gmehling J, Wittig R, Lohmann J, Joh R. A Modified UNIFAC (Dortmund) Model. 4. Revision and Extension. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:1678-1688.
44. Teodorescu M, Wilken M, Wittig R, Gmehling J. Azeotropic and solid-liquid equilibria data for several binary organic systems containing one acetal compound. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2003;204:267-280.