An examination of the influence of involvement level of web site users on the perceived credibility of web sites

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4744 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 176-186

  Ferebee, Susan ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Credibility; Involvement; Web design

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; CREDIBILITY; WEB DESIGN;

WEBSITES;

EID: 38149043417     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (eds.): How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1999)
2. Caine, R.N., Caine, G.: Brain/mind learning (2003), (Retrieved February 2, 2003) from,http://cainelearning.com/brain
3. Celsi, R., Olson, J.: The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 210-224 (1988)
4. Cho, C.H.: How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 21(1), 33-50 (1999)
5. Collins, J.: Measuring credibility assessment targets in web-based information Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University, Florida (2004)
6. Dutta-Bergman, M.J.: The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication 54, 253-269 (2004)
7. Fogg, B.J.: Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 722-723. ACM Press, New York (2003)
8. Fogg, B.J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P., Treinen, M.: What makes a web site credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 61-68. ACM Press, New York (2001)
9. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R.: How do people evaluate a web site's credibility: Results from a large study. Consumer Web Watch Research. (2003), http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/ news/report3_credibilityresearch/stanfordPTL-abstract.htm
10. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is the Limit, pp. 80-87 (1999)
11. Hawkins, S.A., Hoch, S.J.: Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 212-225 (1992)
12. Houston, M.J., Rothschild, M.L.: Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. In: Jain, S.C. (ed.) Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, pp. 184-187. American Marketing Association, Chicago (1978)
13. Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 4(15), 635 (1951)
14. Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L.: Consumer trust in an internet store: A crosscultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5 (2) (1999)
15. Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K.: Cruising is believing? Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 75, 325-340 (1998)
16. McKnight, H.D., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13(3), 334-359 (2002)
17. Mittal, B.: A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement. Psychology and Marketing 12(7), 663-682 (1995)
18. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1915-1926 (1979)
19. Rieh, S. Y.: Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology 53(2), 145-161 (2002)
20. Schweiger, W.: Media credibility - experience or image?: A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication 15(1), 37-59 (2000)
21. Self, C.C.: Credibility. In: Salwen, M.B., Stacks, D.W. (eds.) An integrated approach to communication theory and research, pp. 421-441. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1996)
22. Sternthal, B., Phillips, L., Dholakia, R.: The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (fall), 285-314 (1978)
23. Trochim, W.: The research methods knowledge base. Cornell Custom Publishing, Cornell University, Ithaca (1999)
24. Wathan, GN., Burkell, J.: Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(2), 134-144 (2002)
25. Zaichkowsky, J.L.: Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12, 341-352 (1985)