The effects of very slow rates of stimulus presentation on event-related potential estimates of hearing threshold

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 34-43

  Muller Gass, Alexandra ^a,b   Marcoux, Andŕ ^a   Jamshidi, Parastoo ^a   Campbell, Kenneth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potentials; Hearing threshold; ISI; N1; P2; Rate of stimulus presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BLINKING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 38149038578     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020701647934     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adler, G. & Adler, J. 1989. Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-ms latency range. Audiology, 28, 316-324.
2. Alcaini, M., Giard, M.H., Thévenet, M. & Pernier, J. 1994. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology, 31, 611-615.
3. Atienza, M., Cantero, J.L. & Gómez, C.M. 2001. The initial orienting response during human REM sleep as revealed by the N1 component of auditory event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol, 41, 131-141.
4. Barry, R.J., Clarke, A.R. & Johnstone, S.J. 2003. A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography. Clin Neurophysiol, 114, 171-183.
5. Barry, R.J., Cocker, K.I., Anderson, J.W., Gordon, E. & Rennie, C. 1992. Does the N100 evoked potential really habituate? Evidence from a paradigm appropriate to a clinical setting. Int J Psychophysiol, 13, 9-16.
6. Bastuji, H., García-Larrea, L., Frank, C. & Mauguière, F. 1995. Brain processing of stimulus deviance during slow-wave and paradoxical sleep: A study of human auditory evoked responses using the oddball paradigm. J Clin Neurophysiol, 12, 155-167.
7. Bourbon, W.T., Will, K.W., Gary, H.E. & Papanicolaou, A.C. 1987. Habituation of auditory event-related potentials: A comparison of self-initiated and automated stimulus trains. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 66, 160-166.
8. Budd, T.W., Barry, R.J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C. & Michie, P.T. 1998. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol, 31, 51-68.
9. Campbell, K.B. & Colrain, I.M. 2002. Event-related potential measures of the inhibition of information processing: II. The sleep onset period. Int J Psychophysiol, 46, 197-214.
10. Campbell, K.B. & de Lugt, D. 1995. Event-related potential measures of cognitive deficits following closed head-injury. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (eds.) Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 269-297.
11. Campbell, K.B., Michaud, D.S., Keith, S.E., Muller-Gass, A. & Wiebe, S. 2005. Event-related potential measures of the disruptive effects of trains of auditory stimuli during waking and sleeping states. J Sleep Res, 14, 347-357.
12. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N. & Zerlin, S. 1966. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 21, 105-113.
13. Davis, H. & Zerlin, S. 1966. Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am, 39, 109-116.
14. Donchin, E. & Coles, M.G. 1988. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci, 11, 357-374.
15. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I. & Näätänen, R. 1998. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci, 10, 590-604.
16. Fedtke, T. & Richter, U. 2007. Reference zero for the calibration of air-conduction audiometric equipment using'tone burst' as test signals. Int J Audiol, 46, 1-10.
17. Ford, J.M., Mathalon, D.H., Kalba, S., Marsh, L. & Pfefferbaum, A. 2001. N1 and P300 abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia, epilepsy, and epilepsy with schizophrenia-like features. Biol Psychiatry, 49, 848-860.
18. Fruhstorfer, H. 1971. Habituation and dishabituation of the human vertex response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 30, 306-312.
19. Giard, M.H., Perrin, D., Echallier, J.F., Thevenet, M. & Froment, J.C., et al. 1994. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: A scalp current density and dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 92, 238-252.
20. Hansen, J.C. & Hillyard, S.A. 1980. Endogeneous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 49, 277-290.
21. Hari, R., Kaila, K., Katila, T., Tuomisto, T. & Varpula, T. 1982. Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 54, 561-569.
22. Hillyard, S.A., Hink, R.F., Schwent, V.L. & Picton, T.W. 1973. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177-180.
23. Hone, S.W., Norman, G., Keogh, I. & Kelly, V. 2003. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 128, 257-262.
24. Hyde, M. 1997. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neurootol, 2, 281-307.
25. Hyde, M., Alberti, P., Matsumoto, N. & Li, Y. 1986. Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 96, 514-519.
26. Lightfoot, G. & Kennedy, V. 2006. Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: Accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features. Ear Hear, 27, 443-456.
27. Martin, B.A., Kurtzberg, D. & Stapells, D.R. 1999. The effect of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 271-286.
28. Näätänen, R. 1992. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W. & Mäntysalo, S. 1978. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol, 42, 313-329.
30. Näätänen, R. & Gaillard, A.W.K. 1983. The N2 deflection of ERP and the orienting reflex. In A.W.K. Gaillard & W. Ritter (eds.) EEG Correlates of Information Processing: Theoretical Issues. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 119-141.
31. Näätänen, R. & Picton, T. 1987. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
32. Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Knight, R.T., Woods, D.L. & Woodward, K. 1991. Differential auditory processing continues during sleep. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 79, 281-290.
33. Oates, P., Kurtzberg, D. & Stapells, D.R. 2002. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 23, 399-415.
34. Ogilvie, R.D., Simons, I.A., Kuderian, R.H., MacDonald, T. & Rustenburg, J. 1991. Behavioral, event-related potential, and EEG/FFT changes at sleep onset. Psychophysiology, 28, 54-64.
35. Picton, T.W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S.A., et al. 2000. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
36. Picton, T.W., Goodman, W.S. & Bryce, D.P. 1970. Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity. Acta Otolaryngol, 70, 77-82.
37. Picton, T.W., Lins, O.G. & Scherg, M. 1995. The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (eds.) Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3-73.
38. Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L., Baribeau-Braun, J. & Healey, T.M.G. 1977. Evoked potential audiometry. Can J Otolaryngol, 6, 90-119.
39. Prasher, D., Mula, M. & Luxon, L. 1993. Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: A comparison of noise-induced hearing loss with Ménière's disease. J Laryngol Otol, 107, 780-786.
40. Prosser, S., Arslan, E. & Michelini, S. 1981. Habituation and rate effect in the auditory cortical potentials evoked by trains of stimuli. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 233, 179-187.
41. Rickards, F.W., De Vidi, S. & McMahon, D.S. 1996. Cortical evoked response audiometry in noise induced hearing loss claims. Austr J Otolaryngol, 2, 237-241.
42. Ritter, W., Vaughan, H.G. & Costa, L.D. 1968. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 25, 550-556.
43. Sams, M., Hari, R., Rif, J. & Knuutila, J. 1993. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s: Neuromagnetic evidence. J Cogn Neurosci, 5, 363-370.
44. Scherg, M., Vasjar, J. & Picton, T.W. 1989. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci, 1, 336-355.
45. Schwent, V.L., Hillyard, S.A. & Galambos, R. 1976. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. I. Effects of stimulus delivery rate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 40, 604-614.
46. Stapells, D.R. 2002. Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli. In J. Katz (ed.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th Ed). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 378-406.
47. Tomlin, D., Rance, G., Graydon, K. & Tsialios, I. 2006. A comparison of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Int J Audiol, 45, 580-588.
48. Tsui, B., Wong, L.L.N. & Wong, E.C.M. 2002. Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 41, 330-333.
49. Van Maanen, A. & Stapells, D.R. 2005. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol, 44, 613-624.
50. Vaughan, H.G. & Ritter, W. 1970. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 28, 360-367.
51. Woestenburg, J.C., Verbaten, M.N. & Slangen, J.L. 1983. The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol Psychol, 16, 127-147.
52. Woldorff, M.G. & Hillyard, S.A. 1991. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 79, 170-191.
53. Yeung, K.N.K. & Wong, L.L.N. 2007. Prediction of hearing thresholds: Comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques. Int J Audiol, 46, 17-25.