Cortical electric response audiometry hearing threshold estimation: Accuracy, speed, and the effects of stimulus presentation features

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 443-456

  Lightfoot, Guy ^a   Kennedy, Vicki ^a  

^a ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33748554178     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000233902.53432.48     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Albera, R., Canale, G., Magnano, M., Lacilla, M., Morra, B, Rugiu, M. G., & Cortesina, G. (1991). Relations between pure-tone audiometry and cortical evoked auditory potentials. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 11, 551-562.
2. Alberti, P. W., Hyde, M. L., & Riko, K. (1987). Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants. Journal of Otolaryngology, 16, 362-366.
3. Antinoro, F., & Skinner, P. H. (1968). The effects of frequency on the auditory evoked response. Journal of Auditory Research, 8, 119-123.
4. Appleby, S. V. (1964). The slow vertex maximal sound evoked response in infants. Acta Oto-laryngologica (suppl), 206, 146-152.
5. Bourbon, W. T., Will, K. W., Gary, H. E., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (1987). Habituation of auditory event-related potentials: a comparison of self-initiated and automated stimulus trains. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 160-166.
6. Budd, T. W., Barry, R. J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., & Michie, P. T. (1998). Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 51-68.
7. Butler, R. (1972). The influence of spatial separation of sound sources on the auditory evoked response. Neuropsychologia, 10, 219-226.
8. Coles, R. R. A., & Mason, S. M. (1984). The results of cortical electric response auditory in medico-legal investigations. British Journal of Audiology, 18, 71-78.
9. Davis, H., & Zerlin, S. (1966). Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 109-116.
10. Gibson, W.P.R. (1978). Essentials of Clinical Electric Response Audiometry. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; ISBN 0 443: 01322-5.
11. Henry, G., & Teas, D. (1968). Averaged evoked responses and loudness: analysis of response estimates. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 11, 334-342.
12. Hone, S. W., Norman, G, Keogh, I., & Kelly, V. (2003). The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 128, 257-262.
13. Hyde, M. L. (1985). The effect of cochlear lesions on the A. B. R. In: Jacobson, J.T. The Auditory Brainstem Response. 1st Edition. London: Taylor & Francis; ISBN 0-85066-504-3.
14. Hyde, M. (1997). The N1 response and its applications. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 2, 281-307.
15. Hyde, M., Alberti, P, Matsumoto, N., & Li, Y. L. (1986). Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 96, 514-519.
16. Johnson, T. A., Brown, C. J. (2006). Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison. Ear and Hearing, 26, 559-576.
17. King, P.F., Coles, R.R.A.C., Lutman, M.E., & Robinson, D.W. (1992). Assessment of Hearing Disability. Guidelines for Medicolegal Practice. London: Whurr Publishers; ISBN 1-870332-04-0.
18. McCandless, G. A., & Best, L. (1964). Evoked responses to auditory stimuli in man using a summing computer. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 7, 193-202.
19. Nelson, D. A., Lassman, F. M., & Hoel, R. L. (1969). The effects of variable-interval and fixed-interval signal presentation schedules on the auditory evoked response. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 199-209.
20. Nousak, J. K., & Stapells, D. R. (2005). Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to 1 kHz tones in noise-masked normally-hearing and sensorineurally hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 44, 331-344.
21. Ozesmi, C., Dolu, N., Suer, C., Golgeli, A., & Ascioglu, M. (2000). Habituation of the auditory evoked potential in a short interstimulus interval paradigm. International Journal of Neuroscience 105:87-95.
22. Picton, T. W., Woods, D. L., & Proulx, G. B. (1978). Human auditory sustained potentials, II: stimulus relationships. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45, 198-210.
23. Prasher, D, Mula, M., & Luxon, L. (1993). Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: a comparison of noise induced hearing loss with Meniere's disease. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 107, 780-786.
24. Prosser, S, Arslan, W., & Michelini, S. (1981). Habituation and rate effect in the auditory cortical potentials evoked by trains of stimuli. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 233, 179-187.
25. Rapin, I. (1964). Practical considerations in using the evoked potential technique in audiometry. Acta Oto-laryngologica (suppl), 206, 117-122.
26. Roeser, R., & Price, L. (1969). Effects of habituation on the auditory evoked response. Journal of Auditory Research, 9, 306-313.
27. Rothman, H., Davis, H., & Hay, I. (1970). Slow evoked cortical potentials and temporal features of stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 29, 225-232.
28. Stapells, D. (2002). Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli. In: Katz J. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 5th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; ISBN 0-683-30765-7.
29. Tsui, B, Wong, L. L., & Wong, E. C. (2002). Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 330-333.
30. Van Maanen, A., & Stapells, D. R. (2005). Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology, 44, 613-624.
31. Walter, W. G. (1964). Retrospective summary of definitive tests for hearing in young children. Acta Oto-laryngologica (suppl), 206, 162-172.
32. Woods, D. L., Elmasian, R. (1986). The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 447-459.