The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 257-262

  Hone, Stephen W ^a,b   Norman, Garry ^a   Keogh, Ivan ^a   Kelly, Vivian ^a  

^a Beaumont Hospital   (United States)

^b 4 Ailesbury Gardens ^*  (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; BINAURAL HEARING; CALCULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; HEARING; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; IRELAND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037295070     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2003.79     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Report of the Expert Hearing Group. Hearing disability assessment. 1st ed. Dublin (Ireland): Department of Health and Children; 1998.
2. Alberti PW, Hyde ML, Riko K. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants. J Otolaryngol 1987;16:362-6.
3. King PF, Coles RRA, Lutman ME, et al. Assessment of hearing disability. Guidelines for medico-legal practice. London (UK): Whurr Publishers; 1992.
4. Coles RRA, Mason SM. The results of cortical electrical response audiometry in medico-legal investigations. Br J Audiol 1984;18:71-8.
5. Jones LA, Harding GFA, Smith PA. A comparison of auditory cortical evoked potentials, brainstem evoked potentials and post auricular myogenic potentials in normals and patients with known auditory defects. In: Barber C, editor. Evoked potentials. Lancaster: MTP Press; 1980.
6. Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap. JAMA 1979;241:2055-9.
7. Rickards FW, De Vidi S. Exaggerated hearing loss in noise induced hearing loss compensation claims in Victoria. Med J Aust 1995;163:360-3.
8. Habib RG, Hinchcliffe R. Subjective magnitude of auditory impairment. A pilot study. Audiology 1978;17:6876.
9. Lutman ME, Robinson DW. Quantification of hearing disability for medico-legal purposes based on self-rating. Br J Audiol 1992;26:297-306.
10. Acton WI. Speech intelligibility in a background of noise and noise-induced hearing loss. Ergonomics 1970;13: 546-54.
11. ISO 7029: 1990 Acoustics: threshold of hearing by air conduction as a function of age and sex for otologically normal persons. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organisation for Standardisation.