Limitations of the house of quality to provide quantitative design information

International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 125-146

  Olewnik, Andrew ^a   Lewis, Kemper ^a  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Design and development; House of quality; Quality function deployment

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149037299     PISSN: 0265671X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02656710810846916     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barzilai, J. (1997), "A new methodology for dealing with conflicting engineering design criteria", 18th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Management.
2. Bouchereau, V. and Rowlands, H. (2000), "Methods and techniques to help Quality Function Deployment (QFD)", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 8-20.
3. Breyfogle, F.W. (1999), Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY.
4. Dolan, R. (1990), "Conjoint analysis: a manager's guide", Harvard Business School Cases, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
5. Dym, C. and Mcadams, D. (2004), "Modeling and information in the design process", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT.
6. Frey, D. and Li, X. (2004), "Validating robust parameter design methods", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT.
7. Gibbons, J.D. (1985), Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis, American Sciences Press Inc., Columbus, OH.
8. Green, P. and Srinivasan, V. (1978), "Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issue and outlook", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, pp. 103-23.
9. Hauser, J. (1993), "How Puritan-Bennet used the house of quality", Sloan Management Review, Spring.
10. Hauser, J. and Clausing, D. (1988), "The House of Quality", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 63-74.
11. Hazelrigg, G. (2003a), "Thoughts on model validation for engineering design", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL.
12. Hazelrigg, G. (2003b), "Validation of engineering design alternative selection methods", Journal of Engineering Optimization, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 103-20.
13. Hofmeister, K. (1995), Quality Up, Costs Down: A Manager's Guide to Taguchi Methods and QFD, ASI Press, New York, NY, QFD in the service environment.
14. Kaldate, A., Thurston, D., Emamipour, H. and Rood, M. (2003), "Decision matrix reduction in preliminary design", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL.
15. Malak, R.J. and Paredis, C.J.J. (2004), "On characterizing and assessing the validity of behavioral models and their predictions", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT.
16. Masui, K., Sakao, T., Aizawa, S. and Inaba, A. (2002), "Quality Function Deployment for Environment (QFDE) to support Design for Environment (DFE)", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal.
17. Montgomery, D. (2001), Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY.
18. Olewnik, A., Hammill, M. and Lewis, K. (2004), "Education and implementation of an approach for new product design: an industry-university collaboration", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT.
19. Olewnik, A. and Lewis, K. (2005), "On validating engineering design decision support tools", Journal of Concurrent Engineering Design Research and Applications, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 111-22.
20. Pedersen, K., Emblemsvag, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F. (2000), "Validating design methods and research: the validation square", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, MD.
21. Qfd Institute (2005), "Abstracts from symposia on QFD", QFD Institute, available at: www.qfdi.org/books/.
22. Ramasamy, N.R. and Selladurai, V. (2004), "Fuzzy logic approach to prioritise engineering characteristics in quality function deployment (FL-QFD)", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 1012-23.
23. Saari, D. (2000), "Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. I; Pair-wise vote. II; Positional voting", Economic Theory, Vol. 15, pp. 1-103.
24. Shin, J.-S., Kim, K.-J. and Chandra, M.J. (2002), "Consistency check of a house of quality chart", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 471-84.