Use of different seed tissues for separate biparentage identification of dispersed seeds in conifers: Confirmations and practices for gene flow in Pinus densiflora

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2022-2030

  Iwaizumi, Masakazu G ^a   Watanabe, Atsushi ^a   Ubukata, Masatoshi ^b  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b Japan China Cooperation Science and Technology Center for Forest Tree Improvement Project   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; GENES; SEED;

BIPARENTAGE IDENTIFICATION; MEGAGAMETOPHYTE HAPLOTYPE DATA; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS;

TISSUE;

CONIFEROUS TREE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; HERITABILITY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; PARENTAGE; SEED DISPERSAL;

PINUS DENSIFLORA; SEEDS; SOFTWOODS; TISSUE;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PINUS DENSIFLORA;

EID: 38149036427     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X07-046     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, W.T., and Joly, R.J. 1980. Genetics of allozyme variants in loblolly pine. J. Hered. 71: 33-40.
2. Chase, M.R., Moller, C., Kesseli, R., and Bawa, K.S. 1996. Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature (London), 383: 398-399. doi:10.1038/383398a0.
3. Chayaba, S. 1977. Estimation of the degree of natural selfing in clonal seed orchard of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 59: 414-417. [In Japanese.]
4. Cheliak, W.M., and Pitel, J.A. 1984. Genetic control of allozyme variants in mature tissues of Picea glauca (Moench). Voss. J. Hered. 75: 34-40.
5. Cheliak, W.M., Morgan, K., Dancik, B.P., Strobeck, C., and Yeh, F.C.H. 1985. Segregation of allozymes in megagametophytes of viable seed from a natural population of jack pine (Pinus banksiana). Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 145-151.
6. Dow, B.D., and Ashley, M.V. 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5: 615-627.
7. Dow, B.D., and Ashley, M.V. 1998. High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J. Hered. 89: 62-70. doi:10.1093/jhered/89.1.62.
8. Gerber, S., Mariette, S., Streiff, R., Bodenes, C., and Kremer, A. 2000. Comparison of microsatellites and AFLP markers for parentage analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1037-1048. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00961.x.
9. Godoy, J.A., and Jordano, P. 2001. Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2275-2283. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01342.x.
10. Gonzalez-Martinez, S.C., Gerber, S., Cervera, M.T., Martinez-Zapater, J.M., Gil, L., and Alia, R. 2002. Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1290-1297.
11. Hong, Y.P., Kwon, H.Y., Kim, K.S., Hong, K.N., and Kim, Y.Y. 2004. Discordance between geographical distribution and genetic relationship among populations of Japanese red pine in Korea revealed by analysis of I-SSR markers. Silvae Genet. 53: 89-92.
12. Isagi, Y., Kanazashi, T., Suzuki, W., Tanaka, H., and Abe, T. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of the regeneration process of Magnolia ovobata Thumb. Heredity, 84: 143-151. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00642.x.
13. Kameyama, Y., Isagi, Y., and Nakagoshi, N. 2001. Patterns and levels of gene flow in Rhododendron metternichii var. hondoense revealed by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 10: 205-216. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X. 2001.01181.x.
14. Kara, N., Korol, L., Isik, K., and Schiller, G. 1997. Genetic diversity in Pinus brutia Ten.: altitudinal variation. Silvae Genet. 46: 155-161.
15. Konuma, A., Tsumura, Y., Lee, C.T., Lee, S.L., and Okuda, T. 2000. Estimation of gene flow in the tropical-rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1843-1852. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01081.x.
16. Latta, R.G., Linhart, Y.B., Fleck, D., and Elliot, M. 1998. Direct and indirect estimates of seed versus pollen movement within a population of ponderosa pine. Evolution, 52: 61-67. doi:10.2307/2410920.
17. Lian, C., Miwa, M., and Hogetsu, T. 2000. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Japanese red pine. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1186-1188. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00954-10.x.
18. Lian, C., Miwa, M., and Hogetsu, T. 2001. Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity, 87: 88-98. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00913.x.
19. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B., and Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639-655. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x.
20. Miyata, M., and Ubukata, M. 1994. Genetic variations of allozymes in natural stands of Japanese black pine. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 76: 445-455. [In Japanese.]
21. Müller, G. 1977. Short note: cross-fertilization in a conifer stand inferred from enzyme gene-markers in seeds. Silvae Genet. 26: 223-226.
22. Neale, D.B. 1983. Population genetic structure of the shelter-wood regeneration system in southwest Oregon. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Ore.
23. Ouborg, N.J., Piquot, Y., and Van Groenendael, J.M. 1999. Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J. Ecol. 87: 551-568. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00389.x.
24. Ozawa, H., Chen, H.L., Watanabe, J., and Watanabe, A. 2005. The vision of breeding project of pine-wood resistant to nematode in Fukushima prefecture. For. Tree Breeding, 217: 1-5. [In Japanese.]
25. Richardson, B.A., Brunfeld, S.J., and Klopfenstein, N.B. 2002. DNA from bird-dispersed and wind disseminated pollen provides insights into postglacial colonization and population genetic structure of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Mol. Ecol. 11: 215-227. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002. 01435.x.
26. Satake, Y., Hara, H., Watari, S., and Tominari, T. 1989. Wild flowers of Japan: woody plants. Heibonsha Ltd., Publishers, Tokyo, Japan. [In Japanese.]
27. Schuster, W.S.F., and Mitton, J.B. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity, 84: 348-361. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00684.x.
28. Slate, J., Marshall, T.C., and Pemberton, J. 2000. A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol. Ecol. 10: 801-808.
29. Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freedman and Co., New York.
30. Streiff, R., Ducousso, A., Lexer, C., Steinkelliner, H., Gloessl, J., and Kremer, K. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L., and Q. petraea (Matt.). Liebl. Mol. Ecol. 8: 831-841.
31. Suyama, Y. 2004. Identification of mother trees based on microsatellite analysis of maternal tissues from seeds, fruits, and seedlings. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 86: 177-183. [In Japanese.]
32. Suyama, Y., Tomita, M., Takahashi, J., Takahashi, M., Ueno, N., and Seiwa, K. 2002. Identification of the maternal trees for current-year seedlings of Fagus crenata based on microsatellite analysis. In Proceedings of the VIII International Assocation for Ecology International Congress of Ecology, August 2002, Seoul, Korea. Edited by D.S. Cho. The Ecological Society of Korea, Seoul, Korea. pp. 307.
33. Watanabe, A., Iwaizumi, M.G., Ubukata, M., Kondo, T., Lian, C., and Hogetsu, T. 2006. Isolation of microsalellite markers from Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. using a dual PCR technique. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 6: 80-82. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01145.x.