Morphological phylogenetics of Puya subgenus Puya (Bromeliaceae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 156, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-110

  Hornung Leoni, Claudia T ^a   Sosa, Victoria ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Continuous characters; Morphology; Puya subgenus Puyopsis

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

ARGENTINA; BOLIVIA; CHILE; PERU; SOUTH AMERICA;

BROMELIACEAE; PUYA;

EID: 38149006950     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00740.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Archie JW. 1985. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 34 : 326 345.
2. Baker JG. 1889. Pitcairnia subgenus Puyopsis. Handbook of the Bromeliaceae 91 : 117.
3. Barfuss MJJ, Samuel R, Till W, Stuessy TF. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) based on DNA sequence data from seven plastid regions. American Journal of Botany 92 : 337 351.
4. Benzing H. 2000. Bromeliaceae. Profile of an adaptative radiation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5. Bremer B. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 : 295 304.
6. Chappill JA. 1989. Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 5 : 217 234.
7. Clark WD, Clegg MT. 1990. Phylogenetics comparison among rbcL sequences in the Bromeliaceae. American Journal of Botany 71 : 115 (Abstract).
8. Cranton P, Humphries C. 1988. Cladistics and computers: a chironomid conundrum? Cladistics 4 : 72 92.
9. Crayn DM, Terry RG, Smith JAC, Winter K. 2000. Molecular systematics investigations in Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae) as a basis for understanding the evolution of crassulasean acid metabolism (CAM). In : Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Melbourne : CSIRO, 569 579.
10. Crayn DM, Winter K, Smith JAC. 2004. Multiple origins of crassulacean acid metabolism and the epiphytic habit in the Neotropical family Bromeliaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101 : 3703 3708.
11. Farris J. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology 19 : 83 92.
12. Foster MB. 1950. Puya, the Pineapple's Andean ancestor. National Geographic Magazine 98 : 463 480.
13. Garcia-Cruz J, Sosa V. 2006. Coding quantitative character data for phylogenetic analysis: a comparison of five methods. Systematic Botany 31 : 302 309.
14. Givnish TJ, Millam KC, Evans TM, Hall JC, Pires JC, Berry PE, Sytsma KJ. 2004. Ancient vicariance or recent long-distance dispersal? Inferences about phylogeny and South American-African disjunctions in Rapateaceae and Bromeliaceae based on ndhF sequence data. International Journal of Plant Science 164 (Suppl. S35 S54.
15. Goloboff PA, Farris J, Nixon K. 2003. TNT: tree analysis using new technology. Program and documentation available from the authors. URL http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny [accessed on 20 April 2007].
16. Goloboff PA, Mattoni CI, Quinteros AS. 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 22 : 589 601.
17. Grant T, Kluge GA. 2004. Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20 : 23 31.
18. Hornung-Leoni C, Sosa V. 2004. Uses of the Giant Bromeliad, Puya raimondii. Journal of the Bromeliad Society 54 : 3 8.
19. Hornung-Leoni C, Sosa V. 2005. Morphological variation in Puya (Bromeliaceae): an allometric study. Plant Systematics and Evolution 256 : 35 53.
20. Horres R, Zizka G, Kahl G, Weising K. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics of Bromeliaceae: evidence from trnL (UAA) intron sequences of the chloroplast genome. Plant Biology 2 : 306 315.
21. Johow F. 1898. Ueber Ornithophilie in der chilenischen Flora. Sitzungsber. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 28 : 338 341.
22. Kawasaki S, Hori Y. 1999. Effect of flower number on the pollinator attractiveness and the threshold plant size for flowering in Pertya triloba (Asteraceae). Plant Species Biology 14 : 69 74.
23. Kluge GA. 2003. The repugnant and the mature in phylogenetic inference: atemporal similarity and historical identity. Cladistics 19 : 356 368.
24. Lehtonen S. 2006. Phylogenetics of Echinodorus (Alismataceae) based on morphological data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 150 : 291 305.
25. Luther H. 2002. An alphabetical list of bromeliad binomials, 8th edn. Sarasota : Marie Selby Botanical Garden.
26. Manzanares JM. 2005. Joyas en la Selva, Bromeliaceae del Ecuador, Parte II. Pitcairnioideae. Quito, Ecuador : Imprenta Mariscal.
27. Mez C. 1896. Bromeliaceae, Puya subgenus pitcairniopsis. In : de Candolle X, ed. Monographiae phanerogamarum, Vol. 9. Paris : G. Manson, 475.
28. Nixon K. 2002. Winclada (BETA), Version 0.9.9. Ithaca, NY : published by the author.
29. Pimentel RA, Riggins RR. 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3 : 201 209.
30. Rae TC. 1998. The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 14 : 221 228.
31. Ranker TA, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Gilmatin AJ. 1990. Subfamilial phylogenetic relationships of the Bromeliaceae: evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 15 : 425 434.
32. Smith LB. 1970. Notes on bromeliaceae, XXX. Phytologia 19 : 281 291.
33. Smith LB, Downs RW. 1974. Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae). Flora neotropica monograph, Vol. 14. New York : Hafner Press, 189 191.
34. Smith LB, Looser G. 1935. Las especies chilenas del género Puya. Revista Universitaria 3 : 241 279.
35. Stevens PF. 1991. Character states, morphological variation and phylogenetic analysis: a review. Systematic Botany 16 : 553 583.
36. Terry RG, Brown GK, Olmstead RG. 1997. Examination of subfamily phylogeny in Bromeliaceae using comparative sequencing of plastid locus ndhF. American Journal of Botany 84 : 664 670.
37. Thiele K. 1993. The Holy Grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9 : 275 304.
38. Varadarajan GS, Gilmartin GK. 1988. Morphological variation of some floral features of the subfamily Pitcairnioideae (Bromeliaceae) and their significance in pollination biology. Botanical Gazette 149 : 82 91.