Discussing gene-gene interaction: warning - Translating equations to english may result in jabberwocky

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Bartlett, Christopher W ^a,b   Vieland, Veronica J ^a,b   Bartlett, J ^c   Bell, J T ^c   Bhattacharjee, S ^c   Clerget Darpoux, F ^c   Bush, W S ^c   Edwards, T L ^c   Gao, G ^c   Halder, I ^c   Huang, Y ^c   Kotti, S ^c   Larkin, E K ^c   Li, H ^c   Motsinger, A A ^c   Mukhopadhyay, N ^c   Namkung, J ^c   Park, T ^c   Ritchie, M D ^c   Stein, C M ^c   Zhou, J Y ^c   more..

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Association analysis; Epistasis; Gene x gene interaction; Linkage analysis; Linkage disequilibrium

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC LINKAGE;

EID: 38049012827     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20281     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen MJ, Yen WM. 2002. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc. p 120-127.
2. Almasy L, Blangero J. 1998. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 62:1198-1211.
3. Bell JT. 2007. A two-dimensional genome scan for rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility loci. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1):S63.
4. Bell JT, Wallace C, Dobson R, Wiltshire S, Mein C, Pembroke J, Brown M, Clayton D, Samani N, Dominiczak A, Webster J, Lathrop GM, Connell J, Monroe P, Caulfield M, Farral M. 2006. Two-dimensional genome-scan identifies novel epistatic loci for essential hypertension. Hum Mol Genet 15:1365-1374.
5. Box GR. 1979. Robustness is the strategy of scientific model building. In: Launer RL, editor. Robustness in Statistics. New York: Academic Press. p 202.
6. Carroll L. 1872. Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There. United Kingdom: MacMillan Press.
7. Cheung VG, Spielman RS, Ewens KG, Weber TM, Morley M, Burdick JT. 2005. Mapping determinants of human gene expression by regional and genome-wide association. Nature 437:1365-1369.
8. Cordell HJ. 2003. Affected-sib-pair data can be used to distinguish two-locus heterogeneity from two-locus epistasis. Am J Hum Genet 73:1468-1471; author reply 1471-1473.
9. Cox NJ, Frigge M, Nicolae DL, Concannon P, Hanis CL, Bell GI, Kong A. 1999. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nat Genet 21:213-215.
10. Farrall M. 2003. Reports of the death of the epistasis model are greatly exaggerated. Am J Hum Genet 73:1467-1468; author reply 1471-1473.
11. Gauderman WJ, Siegmund KD. 2001. Gene-environment interaction and affected sib pair linkage analysis. Hum Hered 52:34-46.
12. Huang Y, Bartlett CW, Segre AM, O'Connell JR, Mangin L, Vieland VJ. 2007. Exploiting gene x gene interaction in linkage analysis. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1): S64.
13. Kong A, Cox NJ. 1997. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet 61:1179-1188.
14. Kotti S, Bickeboller H, Clerget-Darpoux F. 2007a. Strategy for detecting susceptibility genes with weak or no marginal effect. Hum Hered 63:85-92.
15. Kotti S, Mathieu Bourgey M, Clerget-Darpoux F. 2007b. Power of the 2-locus TDT for testing the interaction of two susceptibility genes. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1): S65.
16. Larkin EK, Morris NJ, Li Y, Nock NL, Stein CM. 2007. Comparison of affected sibling pair linkage methods to identify gene by gene interaction in GAW 15 simulated data. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1): S66.
17. Li H, Gao G, Li J, Page GP, Zhang K. 2007. Detecting epistatic interactions contributing to human gene expression using the CEPH family data. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1): S67.
18. Motsinger AA, Dudek SM, Hahn LW, Ritchie MD. 2006a. Comparison of neural network optimization approaches for studies of human genetics. Lee Notes Comput Sci 3907:103-114.
19. Motsinger AA, Reif DM, Dudek SM, Ritchie MD. 2006b. Dissecting the Evolutionary Process of Grammatical Evolution Optimized Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions, in press.
20. Mukhopadhyay N, Halder I, Bhattacharjee S, Weeks DE. 2007. Two-dimensional linkage analyses of rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1):S68.
21. Namkung J, Nam J, Park T. 2007. Identification of eQTL by the interaction analysis using Genetic Algorithm. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1):S69.
22. Newton JL, Hamey SM, Wordsworth BP, Brown MA. 2004. A review of the MHC genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Genes Immun 5:151-157.
23. Olson JM. 1999. A general conditional-logistic model for affected-relative-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 65:1760-1769.
24. Risch N. 1990a. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Am J Hum Genet 46:222-228.
25. Risch N. 1990b. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet 46:229-241.
26. Ritchie MD, Motsinger AA. 2005. Multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in pharmacogenomics studies. Pharmacogenomics 6:823-834.
27. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, Bailey LR, Dupont WD, Parl FF. 2001. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69:138-147.
28. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Moore JH. 2003. Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 24:150-157.
29. Ritchie MD, Bartlett J, Bush WS, Edwards TL, Motsinger AA, Torstenson ES. 2007. Exploring Epistasis in candidate genes for rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Proceedings 1(Suppl 1):S70.
30. Vieland VJ, Huang J. 2003a. Reply to Cordell and Farrall. Am J Hum Genet 73:1471-1473.
31. Vieland VJ, Huang J. 2003b. Two-locus heterogeneity cannot be distinguished from two-locus epistasis on the basis of affected-sib-pair data. Am J Hum Genet 73:223-232.