Gene-environment interaction and affected sib pair linkage analysis

Human Heredity

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 34-46

  Gauderman, W James ^a   Siegmund, Kimberly D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Environment; Interaction; Linkage; Power; Sib pairs

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RISK; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS;

EID: 0035018848     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000053352     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Nakachi K, Imai K, Hayashi S, Watanabe J, Kawajiri K: Genetic susceptibility of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in relation to cigarette smoking dose. Cancer Res 1991;51:5177-5189.
2. Nakachi K, Imai K, Hayashi S. Kawajiri K: Polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 and glutathione S-transferase genes associated with susceptibility to lung cancer in relation to cigarette dose in the Japanese population. Cancer Res 1993;53:2994-2999.
3. Sellers T, Bailey-Wilson J, Potter J, Rich S, Rothschild H, Elston R: Effect of cohort differences in smoking prevalence on models of lung cancer susceptibility. Genet Epidemiol 1992;9: 261-272.
4. Hirvonen A: Genetic factors in individual responses to environmental exposures. J Occup Environ Med 1995;37:37-43.
5. Kihara M, Kihara M, Noda K: Risk of cigarette smoking for squamous and small cell carcinomas of the lung modulated by combinations of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 gene polymorphisms in a Japanese population. Carcinogenesis 1995; 16:2331-2336.
6. London S, Daly A, Fairbrother K, et al: Lung cancer risk in African Americans in relation to race-specific CYP1A1 polymorphisms. Cancer Res 1995;55:6035-6037.
7. Aragaki C, Greenland S, Probst-Hensch N, Haile R: Hierarchical modeling of gene-environment interactions: Estimating NAT2* genotype-specific dietary effects on adenomatous polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent 1997;6:307-314.
8. Ursin G, Henderson B, Haile R, Zhou N, Diep A, Bernstein L: Is oral contraceptive use more common in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations than in other women with breast cancer? Cancer Res 1997; 57 3678-3681.
9. Hopkins P, Williams R, Hunt S: Magnified risks from cigarette smoking for coronary prone families in Utah. West J Med 1984;141: 196-202.
10. Gauderman W, Faucett C: Detection of gene-environment interactions in joint segregation and linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61:1189-1199.
11. Siegmund K, Province M, Higgins M, Williams R, Keller J, Todorov A: Modeling disease incidence rates in families: The NHLBI Family Heart Study. Epidemiology 1998;9:557-562.
12. Ottman R: Gene-environment interaction: Definitions and study designs. Prevent Med 1996;25:764-770.
13. Tiret L, Abel L, Rakotovao R: Effect of ignoring genotype-environment interaction on segregation analysis of quantitative traits. Gen Epidemiol 1993;10:581-586.
14. Eaves L: The resolution of genotype × environment interaction in segregation analysis of nuclear families. Genet Epidemiol 1984;1: 215-228.
15. Andrieu N, Goldstein A: Epidemiologic and genetic approaches in the study of gene-environment interaction: An overview of available methods. Epidemiol Rev 1998;20:137-147.
16. Ott J: Analysis of human genetic linkage. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, 1991.
17. Suarez B: The affected sib pair IBD distribution for HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes. Tissue Antigens 1978;12:87-93.
18. McPeek M: Optimal allele-sharing statistics for genetic mapping using affected relatives. Genet Epidemiol 1999;16:225-249.
19. Blackwelder W, Elston R: A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol 1985;2:85-97.
20. Abel L, Alcais A, Mallet A: Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: Interest in the binomial maximum likelihood approach. Genet Epidemiol 1998;15:371-390.
21. Risch N: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Am J Hum Genet 1990;46:222-228.
22. Suarez B, Van Eerdewegh P: A comparison of three affected sib-pair scoring methods to detect HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes. Am J Med Genetics 1984;18:135-146.
23. Ward P: Some developments on the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:1200-1215.
24. Gu C, Rao DC: A linkage strategy for detection of human quantitative-trait loci. II. Optimization of study designs based on extreme sib pairs and generalized relative risk ratios. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:211-222.
25. Risch N: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet 1990;46:229-241.
26. Whittemore A, Halpern J: A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics 1994;50:118-127.
27. Weeks D, Lange K: A multilocus extension of the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1992;50:859-868.
28. Krugylak L, Lander E: Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:439-454.
29. Kruglyak L, Daly M, Reeve-Daly M, Lander E: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:1347-1363.
30. Greenwood C, Bull S: Incorporation of covariates into genome scanning using sib-pair analysis in bipolar affective disorder. Genet Epidemiol 1997;14:635-640.
31. Greenwood C, Bull S: Analysis of affected sib pairs, with covariates with and without constraints. Am J Hum Genet 1999;64:871-885.
32. Rice J, Roehberg N, Neuman R, et al: Covariates in linkage analysis (preliminary manuscripts). Genetic Analysis Workshop 11, Arachon, 1999, pp 567-571.
33. Olson J: A general conditional-logistic model for affected-relative-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:1760-1769.
34. SAGE, Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology, GENIBD routine (version 4.0, currently beta). Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University. Cleveland, 1999.
35. Gauderman W, Morrison J, Siegmund K, Thomas D: A joint test of linkage and G × E interaction using affected sib pairs. Genet Epidemiol 1999;17:S563-S568.
36. Gauderman W, Thomas D: The role of interacting determinants in the localization of genes. Adv Genet, in press.
37. Self S, Liang K-Y: Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 1987;82:605-610.
38. Tu I, Whittemore A: Power of association and linkage tests when the disease alleles are unobserved. Am J Hum Genet 1999;64:641-649.
39. Ottman R: Epidemiologic approach to gene-environment interaction. Genet Epidemiol 1990;7:177-185.
40. Khoury M, Beaty T, Cohen B: Fundamentals of Genetic Epidemiology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993.
41. Claus E, Risch N, Thompson W: Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 1991;48: 232-242.
42. Gauderman W, Morrison J: Evidence for age-specific genetic relative risks in lung cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:41-49.
43. Leal S, Ott J: Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: Benefits and costs. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:567-575.
44. Whittemore A, Tu I: Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62:1228-1242.
45. Elston R: Man bites dog? The validity of maximizing lod scores to determine mode of inheritance. Am J Med Genet 1989;34:487-488.
46. Hodge S, Elston R: Lods, wrods, and mods: The interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models. Genet Epidemiol 1994; 11:329-342.