Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 150-157

  Ritchie, Marylyn D ^a   Hahn, Lance W ^a   Moore, Jason H ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex diseases; Epistasis; Methods; Multilocus; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EMPIRICISM; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RISK; GENOTYPE; HEREDITY; HYPOTHESIS; INHERITANCE; MODEL; MULTIFACTOR DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; PARAMETRIC TEST; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; THEORY; TWIN DISCORDANCE;

ALGORITHMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 0037310257     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10218     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akey JM, Zhang K, Xiong M, Doris P, Jin L. 2001. The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures. Am J Hum Genet 68:1447-56.
2. Anderson JA. 1995. An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bellman R. 1961. Adaptive control processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C. 1984. Classification and regression trees. New York: Chapman and Hall.
4. Busch CP, Hegele RA. 2001. Genetic determinants of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Genet 60:243-54.
5. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. 1996. The risk of determining risk with multivariable models. Ann Intern Med 118:201-10.
6. Frankel WN, Schork NJ. 1996. Who's afraid of epistasis? Nat Genet 14:371-3.
7. Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH. 2003. Multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Bioinformatics (in press).
8. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9. Kardia SLR. 2000. Context-dependent genetic effects in hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2:32-8.
10. Li W, Reich J. 2000. A complete enumeration and classification of two-locus disease models. Hum Hered 50:334-49.
11. Moore JH, Williams SM. 2002. New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension. Ann Med 34:88-95.
12. Moore JH, Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Thornton TA, White BC. 2002a. Application of genetic algorithms to the discovery of complex models for simulation studies in human genetics. In: Langdon WB, Cantu-Paz E, Mathias K, Roy R, Davis D, Poli R, Balakrishnan K, Honavar V, Rudolph G, Wegener J, Bull L, Potter MA, Schultz AC, Miller JF, Burke E, Jonoska N, editors. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. p 1150-5.
13. Moore JH, Parker JS, Olsen NJ, Aune T. 2002b. Symbolic discriminant analysis of microarray data in autoimmune disease. Genet Epidemiol 23:57-69.
14. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. 1996. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373-9.
15. Province MA, Shannon WD, Rao DC. 2001. Classification methods for confronting heterogeneity. Adv Genet 42:273-86.
16. Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, Bailey LR, Dupont WD, Parl FF, Moore JH. 2001. Multifactor dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69:138-47.
17. Schork NJ, Fallin D, Thiel B, Xu X, Broeckel U, Jacob HJ, Cohen D. 2001. The future of genetic case-control studies. Adv Genet 42:191-212.
18. Shannon WD, Province MA, Rao DC. 2001. Tree-based recursive partitioning methods for subdividing sibpairs into relatively more homogeneous subgroups. Genet Epidemiol 20: 293-306.