Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 210-217

  Abrahamse, Elger L ^a   Van Der Lubbe, Rob H J ^a   Verwey, Willem B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INHIBITION; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SERIAL LEARNING; TOUCH; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VIBRATION;

EID: 37849038330     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701566739     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bischoff-Grethe, A., Goedert, K. M., Willingham, D. B., & Grafton, S. T. (2004). Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127-138.
2. Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006a). Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research, 70, 88-102.
3. Deroost, N., & Soetens, E. (2006b). The role of response selection in sequence learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 449-456.
4. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 343-350.
5. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. (1995). Functional anatomy of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 497-510.
6. Hoffmann, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160-173.
7. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
8. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
9. Nattkemper, D., & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98-112.
10. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
11. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 518-597.
12. Rüsseler, J., & Rösler, F. (2000). Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: Evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 104, 45-67.
13. Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. (2005). The serial RT task: Indications for components with different learning rates. Psychological Research, 69, 242-251.
14. Willingham, D. B. (1997). Implicit and explicit memory do not differ in flexibility: Comment on Dienes and Berry (1997). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 587-591.
15. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory and Cognition, 27, 561-572.
16. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
17. Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory, and Cognition, 28, 366-375.
18. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, P. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595-613.
19. Zirngibl, C., & Koch, I. (2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Experimental Psychology, 49, 153-162.