Partial volume corrected image derived input functions for dynamic PET brain studies: Methodology and validation for [11C]flumazenil

NeuroImage

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1041-1050

  Mourik, Jurgen E M ^a   Lubberink, Mark ^a   Klumpers, Ursula M H ^a   Comans, Emile F ^a   Lammertsma, Adriaan A ^a   Boellaard, Ronald ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON 11; FLUMAZENIL; FLUMAZENIL C 11; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE DERIVED INPUT FUNCTION; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; PARTIAL VOLUME CORRECTION ORDERED SUBSET EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BRAIN; CALIBRATION; CAROTID ARTERIES; FLUMAZENIL; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GABA MODULATORS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;

EID: 37849034062     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams R., and Bischof L. Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 16 (1994) 641-647
2. Andersson J.L. A rapid and accurate method to realign PET scans utilizing image edge information. J. Nucl. Med. 36 (1995) 657-669
3. Andersson J.L. How to obtain high-accuracy image registration: application to movement correction of dynamic positron emission tomography data. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25 (1998) 575-586
4. Ashburner J., Haslam J., Taylor C., Cunningham V.J., and Jones T. A cluster analysis approach for the characterization of dynamic PET data. In: Myers R., Cunningham V.J., Bailey D., and Jones T. (Eds). Quantification of Brain Function Using PET (1994), Academic Press, San Diego 301-306
5. Asselin M.C., Cunningham V.J., Amano S., Gunn R.N., and Nahmias C. Parametrically defined cerebral blood vessels as non-invasive blood input functions for brain PET studies. Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 1033-1054
6. Boellaard, R., van Lingen, A., Lammertsma, A.A., 2001a. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. J. Nucl. Med. 42 (5), 808-817 (May).
7. Boellaard, R., van Lingen, A., van Balen, S.C., Hoving, B.G., Lammertsma, A.A., 2001b. Characteristics of a new fully programmable blood sampling device for monitoring blood radioactivity during PET. Eur . J. Nucl. Med. 2001. 28 (1), 81-89 (Jan.).
8. Boellaard R., Knaapen P., Rijbroek A., Luurtsema G.J., and Lammertsma A.A. Evaluation of basis function and linear least squares methods for generating parametric blood flow images using 15O-water and Positron Emission Tomography. Mol. Imaging Biol. 7 (2005) 273-285
9. Boellaard R., Yaqub M., Lubberink M., and Lammertsma A.A. PPET: A software tool for kinetic and parametric analysis of dynamic PET studies. NeuroImage 31 Supl. 2 (2006) T62
10. Brix G., Doll J., Bellemann M.E., Trojan H., Haberkorn U., Schmidlin P., and Ostertag H. Use of scanner characteristics in iterative image reconstruction for high-resolution positron emission tomography studies of small animals. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24 (1997) 779-786
11. Brix G., Zaers J., Adam L.E., Bellemann M.E., Ostertag H., Trojan H., Haberkorn U., Doll J., Oberdorfer F., and Lorenz W.J. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol National Electrical Manufacturers Association. J. Nucl. Med. 38 (1997) 1614-1623
12. Chen K., Bandy D., Reiman E., Huang S.C., Lawson M., Feng D., Yun L.S., and Palant A. Noninvasive quantification of the cerebral metabolic rate for glucose using positron emission tomography, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose, the Patlak method, and an image-derived input function. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 18 (1998) 716-723
13. Defrise M., Kinahan P.E., Townsend D.W., Michel C., Sibomana M., and Newport D.F. Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 (1997) 145-158
14. Fang Y.H., Kao T., Liu R.S., and Wu L.C. Estimating the input function non-invasively for FDG-PET quantification with multiple linear regression analysis: simulation and verification with in vivo data. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 31 (2004) 692-702
15. Gambhir S.S., Schwaiger M., Huang S.C., Krivokapich J., Schelbert H.R., Nienaber C.A., and Phelps M.E. Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. J. Nucl. Med. 30 (1989) 359-366
16. Gunn R.N., Lammertsma A.A., Hume S.P., and Cunningham V.J. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. NeuroImage 6 (1997) 279-287
17. Gunn R.N., Sargent P.A., Bench C.J., Rabiner E.A., Osman S., Pike V.W., Hume S.P., Grasby P.M., and Lammertsma A.A. Tracer kinetic modeling of the 5-HT1A receptor ligand [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 for PET. NeuroImage 8 (1998) 426-440
18. Guo H., Renaut R., Chen K., and Reiman E. Clustering huge data sets for parametric PET imaging. Biosystems 71 (2003) 81-92
19. Hall R. Vascular injuries resulting from arterial puncture of catheterization. Br. J. Surg. 58 (1971) 513-516
20. Hudson H., and Larkin R. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 13 (1994) 601-609
21. Johnson C., Seidel J., Carson R.E., Gandler W.R., Sofer A., Green M.V., and Daube-Witherspoon M.E. Evaluation of 3D reconstruction algorithms for a small animal PET scanner. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44 (1996) 1303-1308
22. Krejza J., Arkuszewski M., Kasner S.E., Weigele J., Ustymowicz A., Hurst R.W., Cucchiara B.L., and Messe S.R. Carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size. Stroke 37 (2006) 1103-1105
23. Lammertsma A.A., and Hume S.P. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. NeuroImage 4 (1996) 153-158
24. Lammertsma A.A., Bench C.J., Hume S.P., Osman S., Gunn K., Brooks D.J., and Frackowiak R.S. Comparison of methods for analysis of clinical [11C]raclopride studies. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 16 (1996) 42-52
25. Liptrot M., Adams K.H., Martiny L., Pinborg L.H., Lonsdale M.N., Olsen N.V., Holm S., Svarer C., and Knudsen G.M. Cluster analysis in kinetic modelling of the brain: a noninvasive alternative to arterial sampling. NeuroImage 21 (2004) 483-493
26. Litton J.E. Input function in PET brain studies using MR-defined arteries. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 21 (1997) 907-909
27. Logan J. Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers. Nucl. Med. Biol. 27 (2000) 661-670
28. Lubberink M., Boellaard R., van der Weerdt A.P., Visser F.C., and Lammertsma A.A. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. 45 (2004) 2008-2015
29. Lubberink M., Greuter H.N.J.M., Boellaard R., Luurtsema G., and Lammertsma A.A. Effect of plasma metabolite correction accuracy on kinetic analysis in positron emission tomography. NeuroImage (2004) 22
30. Machleder H.I., Sweeney J.P., and Barker W.F. Pulseless arm after brachial-artery catheterisation. Lancet 1 (1972) 407-409
31. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., and Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 (1997) 187-198
32. Naganawa M., Kimura Y., Ishii K., Oda K., Ishiwata K., and Matani A. Extraction of a plasma time-activity curve from dynamic brain PET images based on independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 (2005) 201-210
33. Naganawa M., Kimura Y., Nariai T., Ishii K., Oda K., Manabe Y., Chihara K., and Ishiwata K. Omission of serial arterial blood sampling in neuroreceptor imaging with independent component analysis. NeuroImage 26 (2005) 885-890
34. Phelps M.E., Huang S.C., Hoffman E.J., Selin C., Sokoloff L., and Kuhl D.E. Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F-18)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose: validation of method. Ann. Neurol. 6 (1979) 371-388
35. Reader A.J., Julyan P.J., Williams H., Hastings D.L., and Zweit J. EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50 (2003) 1392-1397
36. Rousset O.G., Ma Y., and Evans A.C. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J. Nucl. Med. 39 (1998) 904-911
37. Sanabria-Bohorquez S.M., Labar D., Leveque P., Bol A., De Volder A.G., Michel C., and Veraart C. [11C]flumazenil metabolite measurement in plasma is not necessary for accurate brain benzodiazepine receptor quantification. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27 (2000) 1674-1683
38. Sanabria-Bohorquez S.M., Maes A., Dupont P., Bormans G., de Groot T., Coimbra A., Eng W., Laethem T., De Lepeleire I., Gambale J., Vega J.M., and Burns H.D. Image-derived input function for [11C]flumazenil kinetic analysis in human brain. Mol. Imaging Biol. 5 (2003) 72-78
39. Shepp L.A., and Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1 (1982) 113-122
40. Su K.H., Wu L.C., Liu R.S., Wang S.J., and Chen J.C. Quantification method in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose brain positron emission tomography using independent component analysis. Nucl. Med. Commun. 26 (2005) 995-1004
41. Sumanaweera T.S., Glover G.H., Binford T.O., and Adler J.R. MR susceptibility misregistration correction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 12 (1993) 251-259
42. Syvanen S., Blomquist G., Appel L., Hammarlund-Udenaes M., Langstrom B., and Bergstrom M. Predicting brain concentrations of drug using positron emission tomography and venous input: modeling of arterial-venous concentration differences. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 62 (2006) 839-848
43. Takikawa S., Dhawan V., Spetsieris P., Robeson W., Chaly T., Dahl R., Margouleff D., and Eidelberg D. Noninvasive quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose PET studies with an estimated input function derived from a population-based arterial blood curve. Radiology 188 (1993) 131-136
44. van Dalen J.A., Hoffmann A.L., Dicken V., Vogel W.V., Wiering B., Ruers T.J., Karssemeijer N., and Oyen W.J. A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET. Nucl. Med. Commun. 28 (2007) 485-493
45. van der Weerdt A.P., Klein L.J., Boellaard R., Visser C.A., Visser F.C., and Lammertsma A.A. Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac (18)F-FDG PET scans. J. Nucl. Med. 42 (2001) 1622-1629
46. Visvikis D., Francis D., Mulligan R., Costa D.C., Croasdale I., Luthra S.K., Taylor I., and Ell P.J. Comparison of methodologies for the in vivo assessment of 18FLT utilisation in colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 31 (2004) 169-178
47. Wahl L.M., Asselin M.C., and Nahmias C. Regions of interest in the venous sinuses as input functions for quantitative PET. J. Nucl. Med. 40 (1999) 1666-1675
48. Woods R.P., Grafton S.T., Holmes C.J., Cherry S.R., and Mazziotta J.C. Automated image registration: I General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22 (1998) 139-152
49. Woods R.P., Grafton S.T., Watson J.D., Sicotte N.L., and Mazziotta J.C. Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 22 (1998) 153-165