Relationship between second-generation frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 808-811

  Zarkovic, Andrea ^b,c   Mora, Justin ^a,b   Mckelvie, James ^b   Gamble, Greg ^b  

^a Auckland Eye   (New Zealand)

^b Greenlane Clinical Center   (New Zealand)

^c NONE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Glaucomatous field defect; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37549059542     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01629.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger BS, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 453-64.
2. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger BS, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causes selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1998; 95: 357-63.
3. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger BS et al. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 913-20.
4. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 100: 135-46.
5. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 819-29.
6. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M et al. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 328-33.
7. Spry PGD, Hussain HM, Sparrow JM. Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1031-5.
8. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT et al. Threshold and variability properties of Matrix Frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2451-7.
9. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency-doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 322-31.
10. Bengtasson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998; 76: 268-72.
11. Fingeret M, Johnson CA. RedNova News: The New Humphrey Matrix™ Frequency Doubling Perimeter. 16 January 2004. Accessed 18 October 2004. Available from: http://rednova.com/news/stories/2/2004/01/16/ story104.html
12. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 571-81.