Why did they claim too much? the role of causal attributions in explaining level of cooperation in commons and anticommons dilemmas

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 173-197

  Van Hiel, Alain ^a,c   Vanneste, Sven ^a   De Cremer, David ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Developmental Personality and Social Psychology ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37549053675     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00301.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Buchanan, J. M. Yoon, Y. J. (2000). Symmetric tragedies: Commons and anticommons. Journal of Law and Economics, 43, 1 13.
2. Costa, P. T. McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
3. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review Psychology, 31, 169 193.
4. De Cremer, D. Van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The role of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, S5 S18.
5. Dreyfuss, R. C. (2000). International licensing of intellectual property: UCITA in the international marketplace. Are we about to export bad innovation policy? Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 26, 49 57.
6. Eek, D. Biel, A. (2003). The interplay between greed, efficiency, and fairness in public goods dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16, 195 215.
7. Enzle, M. E., Harvey, M. D. Wright, E. F. (1992). Implicit role obligations versus social responsibility in constituency representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 238 245.
8. Fleishman, J. A. (1980). Collective action as helping behavior: Effects of responsibility diffusion on contributions to a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 629 637.
9. Funder, D. C. (1982). On the accuracy of dispositional versus situational attributions. Social Cognition, 1, 205 222.
10. Funder, D. C. Colvin, R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773 794.
11. Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243 1248.
12. Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111, 621 688.
13. Heller, M. A. Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280, 698 701.
14. Hine, D. W. Gifford, R. (1996). Individual restraint and group efficiency in commons dilemmas: The effects of two types of environmental uncertainty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 993 1009.
15. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick H. A. M. Wilke (Eds Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 59 80). New York : Pergamon.
16. Komorita, S. S. Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183 207.
17. Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M. Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203 215.
18. Luce, R. D. Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. London : Wiley.
19. Mahoney, J. D. (2000). The market for human tissue. Virginia Law Review, 38, 103 123.
20. Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E. Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294 309.
21. Morriss, A. P. Meiners, R. E. (2000). The destructive role of land use planning. Tulane Environmental Law Review, 14, 107 141.
22. Parisi, F., Schulz, N. Depoorter, B. (2005). Duality in property: Commons and anticommons. International Review of Law and Economics, 25, 578 591.
23. Parks, C. D. Rumble, A. C. (2001). Elements of reciprocity and social value orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1301 1309.
24. Rose, C. M. (1999). From local to global commons: Private property, common property, and hybrid property regimes. Expanding the choices for the global commons. Comparing newfangled tradable allowance schemes of old-fashioned common property regimes. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 10, 46 71.
25. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in attribution processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174 221). New York : Academic Press.
26. Schulz, N., Parisi, F. Depoorter, B. (2003). Fragmentation of property: Towards a general model. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159, 594 613.
27. Stouten, J. (2005). Virtue summons the fury: Coordination rules and fairness in social dilemmas (Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series). Amsterdam, The Netherlands : Kurt Lewin Institute.
28. Van Dijk, E. Wilke, H. (1997). Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 71, 195 209.
29. Van Dijk, E. Wilke, H. (2000). Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 92 104.
30. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G. Kuhlman, D. M. (1990). Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-person prisoner's dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 34 48.
31. Vanneste, S., Van Hiel, A., Parisi, F. Depoorter, B. (2006). From tragedy to disaster: Comparing the commons and anticommons dilemmas. International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 104 122.
32. Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S. Messick, S. M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281 307.
33. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency, and fairness in resource management situations. In W. Stoeber M. Hewstone (Eds European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165 187). New York : John Wiley & Sons.